What are the "reference management institutions" and "reference management people's organizations and mass organizations" of the subordinate systems for civil servants?

"People's organizations and mass organizations managed by reference" are institutions managed by reference to the Civil Service Law.

As a special institution, public institutions have certain characteristics, mainly in the differences and connections with administrative organs and general institutions.

For institutions and administrative organs, their staffing management is different, but the same personnel management system is implemented, that is, the civil service system. In principle, China's public * * * departments implement different personnel systems according to different staffing types, administrative staff implement the civil service management system, and career staff implement the personnel management system of public institutions.

However, public institutions are an exception in the establishment management and personnel system management in China, that is to say, the staff of public institutions with reference to civil service management are still in the career establishment sequence, but managed according to the civil service management measures.

Article 6 of the Measures for Examination and Approval of Units Administered by Reference to the Civil Service Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that units that implement reference management shall register their personnel, determine their job grades and change their salaries in accordance with the Implementation Plan of the Civil Service Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), and manage their staff except the ground staff in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Service Law and its supporting policies and regulations.

The reference management unit does not implement the personnel management system of professional and technical positions, wages, bonuses and other institutions. In addition, although both public institutions and administrative organs implement the civil service system, generally speaking, the staff of administrative organs are called "civil servants" and the staff of public institutions are called "public officials".

For public institutions and general public institutions, both belong to the establishment of public institutions, but different personnel systems are implemented. The former implements the civil service system, while the latter implements the personnel management system of public institutions.

The civil service system and the personnel management system of public institutions are different in many aspects of personnel management, such as recruitment, promotion, salary, retirement and pension. For example, the recruitment of public institutions and administrative organs must comply with the provisions of the Regulations on the Employment of Civil Servants and other laws and regulations, while the recruitment of staff in public institutions must be carried out in accordance with a series of regulations on public recruitment of public institutions.

Only institutions that meet certain conditions can obtain the status of participating in public management after examination and approval. The Opinions on Relevant Issues Concerning the Management of Public Institutions by Reference to the Civil Service Law clearly stipulates that the reference management of public institutions should meet two conditions at the same time: First, it should have the public affairs management function authorized by laws and regulations; Second, the use of career establishment, and by the state financial burden of wages and benefits.

There are differences in the resources enjoyed by public institutions and general public institutions, which are mainly manifested in two aspects: first, the authority and credibility of public institutions can be enhanced through the establishment of their management status; Second, the identity of participating in public management ensures that the staff participating in public institutions have similar welfare benefits as civil servants.

For example, public officials can basically communicate without barriers between institutions and state organs, and there is more room for career development. Therefore, most organizations very much hope to incorporate public participation management.

Extended data:

Basic information of participating institutions

In May 2005, the Civil Service Law was promulgated, which confirmed the identity of public management institutions from the legal point of view. In April, 2006, the notice of "Implementation Plan of People's Republic of China (PRC) Civil Servant Law" was issued, and Annex V of the implementation plan-"Measures for Examination and Approval of Units Managed by Reference to People's Republic of China (PRC) Civil Servant Law" stipulated the examination and approval measures for public institutions.

In August 2006, the former Ministry of Personnel issued "Opinions on Relevant Issues Concerning the Management of Public Institutions by Reference to the Civil Service Law", which stipulated in detail the conditions, examination and approval authority and procedures of public institutions. The promulgation system of the above-mentioned laws and regulations stipulates the approval and management of public institutions.

With the issuance of the Notice on Printing and Distributing the List of Institutions Directly under the CPC Central Committee and the State Council with Reference to the Civil Service Law in September 2006, the system of participating in public administration institutions began to take root in practice. According to statistics, there are about 900,000 employees in more than 40 million institutions in China.

At the central level, there are currently 19 institutions directly under the CPC Central Committee and the State Council, which are managed according to the Civil Service Law. In addition, some people's organizations and mass organizations participate in the management of public affairs.

In August 2006, 2/kloc-0 people's organizations and mass organizations, including the All-China Federation of Trade Unions, were included in the Opinions on the Management of People's Organizations and Mass Organizations with reference to the Civil Service Law of People's Republic of China (PRC).

At the local level, the situation of participating institutions is more complicated than that at the central level. First of all, institutions at the central level set a benchmark for local governments. According to the routine of "up and down correspondence" or "up and down effect", some institutions implement public participation management at the central level, usually at the local level.

For example, party schools and administrative colleges at all levels. Secondly, although some institutions have not implemented public participation management at the central level, they may implement public participation management at the local level. For example, the agricultural machinery supervision station of the Ministry of Agriculture did not implement public participation management, but the agricultural machinery supervision stations in all provinces in China basically implemented public participation management.

Third, the participation of institutions with the same function is different in different regions. For example, in Xinjiang and Sichuan, most agricultural machinery supervision institutions in cities and counties implement public participation management, but not in Beijing and Hebei.