Will the husband and wife bear legal responsibility for pushing their Labrador from the window of a tall building because of a quarrel?

This should constitute the crime of throwing objects at high altitude. If she only pushed it once, it might be an emotional argument. But as the video said, it was not pushed down the first time, and then pushed down the second time, which proved that this was an obvious intentional act and could completely constitute the crime of throwing objects at high altitude. As for dogs, I don't think it's good, but this behavior is really moral and I can't control it. To put it bluntly, this is someone else's dog. Even life is not a person, but property. Killing or chopping is someone's freedom, and they have not abused it.

First, most people who keep pets are trying to appease their lonely hearts. Having a companion can make them happy. In fact, as time goes on,

Pets have established feelings with people. Some people really love their pets, and some people actually regard pets as something.

In fact, pet dogs are very simple and loyal. They are sincere to their masters and spend a short life with them. Why not?

Some people are really bad. They only care about themselves and don't care about others.

I don't know why the couple pushed their pet dog down the fourth floor, but it's important to control their emotions. After all, this is also.

It is a life, but now it is raised by a kind person, otherwise what will it do for the rest of its life?

In addition, their behavior also involves security issues. If there are other people downstairs, if the pet falls and hits others, then this is it.

Another problem, and then they need to pay the price for their emotions.

Over the years, it has been difficult to cure for a long time, not only because of law enforcement, but also because this clause was already popular when legislation was enacted.

Naked to protect dog owners. Even if the existing regulations are implemented, the dog disease will be very serious.

Policies should be the concentrated expression of public opinion, must represent the real public opinion and respond to the real demands of the people in a timely manner. Over the years, people have

The public has reacted strongly to the increasingly serious dog disease, and the voices of major online forums and comment areas demanding that Beijing resume the urban dog ban as soon as possible are endless.

Never heard of it. ?

Secondly, it is particularly important to point out that dog lovers and animal protection associations are very organized, so it is easy to form a group to create fake people.

Meaning, misleading government decision-making. The pet black industrial chain behind dog lovers can organize groups and be good at using modern communication channels.

Tao, familiar with all kinds of communication laws and techniques, has long reversed black and white and skillfully created false public opinion.

In the face of individual and scattered dog owners, organized dog-loving associations have obvious advantages. Dog-loving associations can make it easier.

False public opinion.

People who bully people who don't have dogs steal the identity of "speaking for the people" And government departments face dog lovers

Deliberately creating false public opinion, I don't know whether I can't understand the problem or see it clearly, but I still have to press it.

Make distribution and constantly compromise and surrender to dog lovers.

Since 1994, the government has misjudged public opinion on the issue of dog policy, which has made the people extremely chilling. Of course, this misjudgment makes

What is achieved is everyone's pain. Whether it is the children of ordinary people or the children of leaders, many of them are scared out of their wits by their neighbors' dogs.

Physical. Even the children of dog lovers were bitten by the neighbor's dog. A dog license as cheap as 1000 yuan is tantamount to raising a dog.

Completely indulgent, the final result is that everyone has no good life.

Third, this shows that the dog management regulations have become a dead letter, and dogs should have been confiscated by law enforcement agencies long ago, instead of being pushed downstairs by dog owners.

Beijing clearly stipulates that it is forbidden to keep Labrador dogs, but it is not implemented seriously.

Beijing has long stipulated that large dogs with a shoulder height of more than 35cm, including Labradors, should be banned. But why do people think that there are many big dogs running amok in the streets in Beijing, and nobody cares?

Why do you need netizens to report one by one every time, and don't care if you don't report it?

Why don't the relevant departments take the initiative to clean up all large dogs with shoulder height over 35cm?

Labrador is not a docile big dog in the mouth of dog lovers, but a vicious dog with strong deception. The earliest animal protection association for killing dogs was a traitor, not a Japanese devil.

1994 to 2003, the dog license fee in Beijing was 5000 yuan. After 2003, the Animal Protection Association once again forced Beijing to pay the dog license fee.

Reduce the cost to 1000 yuan. Since then, the era of dog flooding has begun.

Fourth, not only the management fee for raising dogs has plummeted, but also the killing method for illegally raising dogs is almost no longer used.

Ok, dog lovers, but the proliferation of dogs has been shocking.

Dogs must be banned in cities. If there are large dogs and small dogs, this boundary is blurred, and many unscrupulous dog owners take advantage of this legal loophole.

Before 1994, dogs were completely banned in Beijing. At present, large dogs with a shoulder height of more than 35cm are prohibited, but there are actually many large dogs in Beijing. Because the law enforcer's reason is that he looks

I can't tell whether a dog is over 35cm, so I almost never take the initiative to enforce the law. Only by repeatedly reporting and reporting seriously can we report successfully.

For example, there is a great volunteer in Beijing who sent dogs to ban them in actual combat. Over the years, he has washed dozens of large dogs. Don't think you've packed dozens.

Even if it succeeded, it took countless efforts to achieve this result. For this reason, I have confronted dog slaves many times. Most people don't have this at all

Energy and determination. But it took him years to clean up dozens.

People of insight have long pointed out that cities do not have the conditions for raising dogs.

Dog lovers don't listen. Dog lovers shouted, "My hobby of playing with dogs is bigger than the sky."

Finally, people who throw dogs are also dog lovers.

There is no happiness by coercion.

Cities do not have the objective conditions for raising dogs. Dog lovers keep dogs for fun for their own selfish desires, and eventually harm people and dogs, making dogs hair all over the place.

The dog owner said: I just don't want dogs to shit in their own homes, so I specially train dogs to shit outdoors.

Netizens are asking: why don't dog owners shit in their own homes and deliberately let dogs shit?

Do you think it is natural for dogs to shit outside?

After understanding the inner thoughts of dog lovers, netizens no longer believe in civilized dog keeping, but call for banning dog keeping.

As a lesson from the past, civilized dog raising has long been proved to be a complete lie.