Ten Skills of Dealing with Interviewers Easily in Interview

In the job interview, if you want to improve yourself successfully in a short time, the candidate's speech strategy and eloquence are a key factor. I'll teach you a few tricks. You might as well give it a try. The first trick: shut up and think twice before you answer.

In the interview field, one of the basic strategies often adopted by examiners is to let candidates talk as much as possible, in order to learn more about what candidates have not reflected in the written materials. When the interviewer asks "What are your weaknesses" during the interview, a job seeker answers according to the prepared answers. But when he saw that the examiner didn't answer after listening, he thought that his answer was not good and he was afraid of the ice, so he told another shortcoming. But the examiner has been quietly listening or not talking. In this way, job seekers talked a lot one after another without considering it beforehand. As the saying goes, "if you talk too much, you will lose." This answer is unwise, and the result is often the examinee himself.

You must keep your mouth shut during the interview. If you think you have finished your answer, don't say any more. It is best not to try to use the strategy of talking more in order to promote yourself and let the recruiter know more about himself in a short time. In fact, this way is not desirable for most people. Never talk more about what to say and what not to say, let alone take the initiative to attack, so as not to gild the lily and make much ado about nothing.

The second measure: leave enough room for advance and retreat and improvise.

During the interview, candidates should pay attention to using flexible language skills for those problems or "trap" problems that need to be expounded from several aspects, and don't say dead at the beginning. Otherwise, it is easy to get yourself into an embarrassing situation or a "trap".

When the examiner puts forward "? How many points do you think should be grasped? " When you ask such a question, you'd better start your answer like this: "I think this question should grasp the following points." Here, I use "a few" instead of specific numbers "three", "four" or "five" to answer, thus reserving a flexible space for myself to enrich myself while thinking. On the other hand, if the words are dead, once they get stuck, they will be flustered and nervous, and the questions that can be answered completely will not be answered well.

When the examiner asks, "It is said that you are right? The problem is well studied, so tell me your opinion. " When you ask such a leading question, your answer should be very careful. Because the examiner defines you in a specific background when asking questions, it is actually a "trap" set up to get to know you better. Even if you're right? The problem is well studied, and we must not be self-righteous, otherwise we will face more difficult tracking problems. You might as well answer: "Not much research, just a little knowledge, let's discuss it together." On the surface, this is a humility to the examiner, but the essence is to leave room for yourself so as to improvise.

The third measure: stabilize your emotions and be calm and rational.

Sometimes during the interview, the examiner will ask an unexpected question to test the adaptability and processing ability of the candidate. At this time, what you need is to stabilize your emotions and never lose your mind.

A foreign trade import and export company recruited a secretary at a talent exchange meeting. A young lady was admitted, and all the conditions met the requirements of the recruiting unit. Just as the employer was about to make a decision to hire her, an examiner had a brainwave and asked another question: "Miss, if the guest you receive asks you to dance with him in the future, you don't want to dance, but you can't, what will you do?" Unexpectedly, the examiner's voice just fell, and the young lady immediately blushed and angrily said to the recruiter, "What unit are you, setting up a stall to recruit dancers here!" Say that finish, even didn't get back the job application materials, angrily left.

In fact, that company is a very respectable and prestigious enterprise. The questions raised by the examiner can be said to be common problems in work, and there is nothing unhealthy and it is not difficult to answer. If it's you, you might as well answer: "Our company is a regular enterprise, and I don't think we will meet any irresponsible people. Dancing is not a bad thing under normal circumstances. "

The fourth measure: noncommittal answer, ambiguous.

In the examination room, the examiner often sets some questions that are not pleasing whether you give a positive answer or a negative answer. For example, the examiner asked, "I'm afraid you can find a better unit than our company at your current level?" If your answer is yes, it means that you are arrogant, or "you are in Cao Cao and your heart is in Han"; If your answer is no, it doesn't mean that you have a problem with your ability or are not confident; If you answer "I don't know" or "I don't know", you are suspected of refusing to answer. What a dilemma!

Don't worry, you should be good at answering this question with vague language when you encounter any unsatisfactory answer. You can start with "you can't generalize" and then explain your views from both positive and negative aspects. I might as well answer this question like this: "Maybe I can find a better company than yours, but other companies may not pay as much attention to talent training as your company, and may not have as many opportunities as your company. I think it is most realistic to cherish what you have. " Such an answer will not only put you in a favorable position, but also make the examiner appreciate your intelligence and "courage."

The fifth measure: round your own words, watertight.

In the interview, sometimes some questions asked by the examiner do not necessarily require any standard answers, but only require the interviewer to answer them in a watertight and self-evident way. This requires candidates to think carefully as much as possible before answering questions, so as not to put themselves in a passive position. The purchasing manager of a shopping mall attended the interview. When the examiner asked, "Please give an example of your work norms and procedures", he replied, "This may involve our business secrets." The examiner said, "Well, please tell me what is not a trade secret." In this way, the problem is more difficult. He first pointed out which are trade secrets and which are not. Once he makes a mistake, it shows that his professional level is not enough. If you can't justify yourself, you may be forced into a "dead corner."

There are two typical questions, which appear most frequently in the interview field. One is "What is your greatest strength?" The second is "What is your greatest weakness?" These two questions seem simple, but they are actually difficult to answer well. Because then the examiner will ask, "How does your advantage help our work?" "How will your shortcomings affect our work?" After that, you can get deeper and deeper, and it is easy for candidates to fall into an embarrassing situation where people can't "justify themselves". To some extent, the interview is a battle of wits. In order to be watertight, you must make your own statement.

The sixth trick: thinking in an eclectic way, "crooked" and "positive".

In the interview, if the examiner asks simplistic questions like games or jokes, you should turn your head more and think about whether the examiner is referring to something else, whether you are examining your IQ, EQ or LQ. If so, we should jump out of the shackles of conventional thinking, adopt an unconventional thinking or divergent thinking way to answer questions, and never give a matter-of-fact answer mechanically, in order to receive the miraculous effect of "hitting the nail on the head".

A young woman with a low education went to a big company to apply for a management position. An examiner suddenly asked, "What is one plus one?" First of all, the young woman froze. After a little thought, she suddenly asked the examiner, "What kind of situation are you talking about?" ? If it is team spirit, then one plus one is greater than two; If you are a person, then one plus one is less than two. So, what's one plus one? It depends on how much you want. "Because of the unconventional coping style adopted by young women, she stands out among many candidates.

The seventh measure: calm your mood and be tactful and alert.

In the field of examination, examiners often ask some challenging questions about job seekers' weaknesses. For example, young job seekers will be asked, "judging from your age, we think you are too young to be a manager." What do you think? " For older job seekers, they will ask, "We think you are a little old, and I'm afraid you are not as energetic as young people. What do you think? " By analogy, in the face of such questions, if you answer "no", "no", "not necessarily", "I don't think so" and "not at all", although you can express your thoughts, because the tone is too blunt, too direct denial will often cause the examiner's displeasure. The better answers should be "this statement is not necessarily all right", "this view is worth discussing", "this view can be discussed" and "this statement has some truth, but I am afraid it is not completely acceptable" and so on. In short, in the face of this challenging question, we must calmly refute and complain politely, and never be emotional, let alone angry, so as not to arouse the examiner's resentment and lead to the failure of the exam.

The eighth trick: fly the wings of imagination, there is something in the text.

In the interview, there will be some weird hypothetical questions occasionally, which are generally uncertain and random, which also gives candidates room to play their imagination and creative thinking when answering. As long as we make full use of our accumulated knowledge and boldly "assume" against "assume", we will certainly win the initiative and win the battle.

A Chinese-American lady went to an American company to take an exam. Among the many strange questions of Microsoft, she met such a strange question: "How can you weigh an airplane without a balance?" This is a hypothetical question, so tricky and strange that it is almost impossible. You see, this Chinese lady gave a "tooth for tooth" and responded in a hypothetical way. "It depends on whether you use China's method or the American method. If he comes from China, he will be inspired by the ancient statue of Cao Chong; If he were an American, would he be more realistic? d？ D It can be romantic to weigh the parts separately, and it is not impossible to invent an oversized hanging scale. " This imaginative and creative answer surprised the examiner, so she naturally passed the interview.

The ninth trick: keep your own personality, subtle and generous.

Some female candidates often encounter sensitive questions raised by examiners when applying for special positions such as miss public relations, secretaries and actors. Generally speaking, candidates can answer in a vague, vague and generous way. Because in this case, the examiner's intention is mainly to test your adaptability or IQ, ambiguity is not only harmless, but sometimes it can also play a role in confirming the candidate's intelligence and adaptability.

A young girl went to a film and television communication company to take an exam. The examiner asked such an incredible question: "What should you do if you are hired and come across such a script?" d？ D is it answered or not? Faced with this embarrassing question, the girl blushed and immediately replied, "That depends on what kind of situation it is. If it has nothing to do with the plot, but to attract and please the audience, I won't take the initiative to answer it. Of course, if it is really necessary for the plot, I think I will also ask the director to handle it in other ways? d？ D for example, the blur of the picture, the adjustment of the lens and so on. "This kind of response, which is neither affirmative nor negative, seems ambiguous, but while protecting its own personality, it cleverly avoids the essence of the problem. No wonder, the examiners were moved by her cleverness, which made her walk on the silver screen smoothly.

The tenth trick: in the face of "difficulties" and "clever disputes", tit for tat.

In the examination room, being good at "contest" is also the "killer" for examiners to "make things difficult".

A girl from China went to Oxford University for an interview. She had an argument with the host about an experimental topic. The host was a little angry and said, "Do you think this will convince me? No, no! " The China girl who took the exam calmly said, "Of course not, because you were a psychologist before I was born? d？ D However, if no one comes to do this experiment, no one will ever know who is right and who is wrong. " The host is still firm: "With your experimental plan? It has more than ten mistakes! " China girl said: "that only shows that it is immature;" This is why I am here to learn from you. " The host paused and said, "Do you think I will guide those who oppose me?" China girl smiled: "I chose this topic because you raised such a question in your own monograph: Is the purpose of behavioral therapy to give people who suffer from pain the right to live a normal life?" d？ D To be honest, I don't necessarily agree with other words in your book, but this sentence has become my motivation to learn. " After a "tit-for-tat" contest, the host had to sit up and take notice of this oriental woman, and he readily accepted this China girl with courage and personality. Obviously, the "killer" here is undoubtedly that the candidates skillfully quoted the host's monograph in the "competition".