Chongqing national tax

Interview of civil servants in Sichuan national tax system in 2005;

1. Introduce yourself:

People in the society say that the national tax system is good and the treatment is high. Why did you apply?

How do you understand: serving the people.

4. The unit will organize a "poverty alleviation" activity, and you are responsible for it. How will you carry out this work?

5. What do you think and do if you work smoothly after you arrive, and the leader suddenly throws you into the petition department?

Interview is a structured interview, which can be divided into several parts:

I. gfd 20%

Second, language expression accounts for 20%

Third, logical thinking 20%

Fourth, the ideological attitude is 20%

Verb (abbreviation of verb) has a response rate of 20%.

There are several knowledge points to evaluate:

First, interpersonal relationships (including between colleagues, between leaders and led)

Second, the principle of solving problems

Third, views on social hot issues

Fourth, the ability of organization and coordination (you may be asked to organize a reception, etc. )

5. react on the spot (give a group of words, let you string together a story, etc. )

Six, introduce yourself (pay attention to simplicity, modesty, seeking truth from facts)

Candidates can read some interview instructions properly before the interview; During the interview, always keep a sincere, practical and calm attitude, and don't set yourself too high or too low. You should not only express your advantages clearly, but also talk big.

Self-presentation should take three to five minutes, don't cover everything, don't emphasize learning too much, but the other party's interest in the topic, enough is enough. When introducing your own advantages and strengths, you should combine specific examples; At the same time, according to the position you are applying for, consciously introduce the reasons why you are qualified.

Before the interview, candidates should have an understanding of the nature and characteristics of the work of the ministries they apply for, and be familiar with the public welfare concept emphasized by the competent authorities. At the same time, we should objectively evaluate our own advantages and disadvantages. When answering questions, we should also pay attention to the pronunciation and intonation of the expression. We can carry out conscious training and correction in advance, pay attention to grasping the time and expressing clearly.

When interviewing, men had better wear professional clothes; Women's clothing should also be neat and generous, and light makeup can be used.

Pay attention to the following details during the interview:

1. The waiting period before the interview, don't be paranoid, don't let the interview order affect you, believe in yourself.

2. When entering the door, gently push the door and gently cover it. Smile, then walk to your seat. Don't sit down yet, take a quick look at the indoor examiner and bow and say,' Hello, examiners!' Then sit down and sit up straight.

When you are seated, the examiner will explain to you the requirements of the interview, such as how many questions you will be asked, how much time you have to think and how much time you have to answer. (generally 3)

After the explanation, he began to ask questions. At this time, even if you have prepared the question he asked, you should stop and think about it before answering. Of course, you don't have to stop thinking exactly as he said.

In this process, we should face up to the examiner and not bow our heads. After the answer, be sure to say "the answer is over!" .

6. When you indicate that you can leave, stand up, bow gently and say, "Thank you, examiners!" Open the door and gently cover it.

When answering questions, please pay attention to:

1. Be comprehensive. Everything has two sides, and we can look at the problem from multiple angles.

2. Clear organization. We should adopt "first, ... second, ... third, ...". But in general, it can't exceed four, and three points is enough.

3. Pay attention to the time. You should have a concept of time and pay attention to how much time you have answered. If it exceeds the time, he will interrupt you.

Don't affect your mood and attention because you don't answer the questions well.

Pay attention to the key points of your point of view when answering questions. Civil servant interview is different from other enterprise job interviews, and it has some uniqueness determined by its nature. Many viewpoints can be integrated and applied with each other. Pay special attention to the following viewpoints: adhere to principle and flexibility; The relative relationship between fairness and efficiency;

You can go online to see the basic information of the department you are applying for and the relevant new laws and policies. I have some general questions about the interview here: the interview of civil servants in a central state organ in 2004 and its dialysis

What is provided here is an original question and its analysis used by an organ of the central state in the recruitment interview of civil servants for your careful appreciation.

Description: Hello, first of all, congratulations on your successful passing the written test. Welcome to today's interview. I invited you here in the hope of getting to know you directly through conversation. We will ask you some questions, some of which are related to your past experience, and some of which need your opinion. I hope you can answer our questions seriously and realistically, and try to reflect your actual situation and real thoughts. In the later evaluation stage, we will verify what you said. We will keep your personal information confidential. The interview time is about 30 minutes. Before answering each question, you can think about it and don't be nervous. Please pay attention to the brevity of the language when you answer. Ok, let's start now. 1. Please briefly introduce yourself in 3 minutes and talk about your main advantages and disadvantages. What are your specialties and hobbies? (5 points). Follow-up: Do you like books and newspapers? What kind of books do you like to read? What kind of publications do you often read? Topic intention: background topic. The purpose of this question is to let the candidates enter the interview state with a relaxed topic and examine the candidates' language expression ability and self-cognition ability. In the process of candidates introducing their own advantages and disadvantages, we can also see whether they are prepared. The questioning part focuses on candidates' hobbies, knowledge they have learned and enriching and improving their awareness in business. The general answer of candidates is that they love reading newspapers. When asked to list the newspapers they often read, they often blurt out, but from the types of newspapers, they can know their hobbies and knowledge. Candidates' emphasis on majors and their initiative of self-improvement can be understood from reading professional newspapers and periodicals. Scoring standard: Good: The self-introduction is concise and comprehensive, the expression is clear and fluent, you have a correct and objective evaluation of yourself, and you can see a strong and correct job search motivation. When answering some questions, the response is quick and natural, and the expression is true and credible; The hobby level is high, and the knowledge is closely related to the major. English: the expression is basically clear and organized, and I have a more objective understanding of myself. When answering some questions, books and newspapers that reflect nature and hobbies have a certain level and show a wide range of knowledge. Poor: unclear expression or lack of objective understanding of oneself, unclear motivation. When answering some questions, reflect the truth but narrow, the level is not high or does not meet the professional requirements; Or have no reading habits; Or pretend to be profound but can't stand analysis. 2. Do you have any ideas about your future career goals? What preparations have you made for this? What conditions have been met, or what achievements have been made? Please talk for 3-4 minutes. (5 points) Topic intention: background topic. Get a preliminary understanding of candidates' aspirations, study and work, and collect information for the following topics. Examiners can appropriately ask candidates about their study and work, and ask about their grades as much as possible, so that candidates can enhance their self-confidence on the spot and eliminate their nervousness. From the applicant's career ideas and preparations, we can examine the matching between the applicant's job-seeking motivation and the position to be held, as well as the firmness of the motivation. Scoring standard: Good: The candidate has a clear vision for the future, comprehensive and sufficient preparation, clear and fluent expression, and the motivation matches the position. Chinese: Candidates have a vision for the future and are prepared. The expression is organized and the motivation is reasonable. Poor: candidates are at a loss about the future, or have no actual preparation for the future; The expression is scattered and unclear, and there is no connection or conflict with the post situation. According to your major and ability, you can choose a wide range of occupations. Why did you choose state organs and my unit in particular? (4 points) Follow up: 1. Introduce some difficulties existing in our unit at present. 2. What preparations have the candidates made for this? Topic intention: a willing topic. Check the matching degree between the candidate's job hunting motivation and the proposed position. Examiners can ask candidates about their career pursuit and real life needs, and even put pressure on candidates to examine their self-emotional control ability, try to fully understand their real requirements for career and life, and then compare them with the conditions and requirements provided by the position. Scoring standard: Good: the applicant has clear intention, honest attitude, strong career pursuit, does not avoid the needs of life, and the job hunting motivation is consistent with the job conditions; Emotional stability under questioning. English: The basic intention is clear and credible, the job hunting motivation does not conflict with the working conditions, and the mood is basically stable. Poor: vague intention, false attitude, or conflict between job hunting motivation and working conditions, emotional instability or out of control under questioning. Please tell me one thing that you have done successfully in your life or study. What was the situation then? How did you do that? What experience do you have? Please speak in as much detail as possible. (5 points) Pause and ask questions gradually: What is the final result? What do people say? How do you evaluate yourself? What experience or lessons have you learned from it? Topic intention: behavior topic. This question examines candidates' planning, organization and coordination abilities, as well as related work experience and self-awareness ability. At the same time, we can also see the candidates' values and achievement motivation from this question. Note: Be sure to ask specific examples. Scoring standard: Good: The work is really beautiful, showing credible planning, organization and coordination ability. Others spoke highly of it, and their own comments were pertinent and objective. We can treat shortcomings correctly. English: I do things in general, but I can see some abilities and related experience; My own evaluation is basically to the point. Poor: I can't say it after repeated inspiration, or I think what is successful is not really successful. I can't evaluate myself correctly and objectively, and lack relevant experience and thinking summary. In the process of work or study, you may encounter this situation: you and a colleague (or classmate) need to complete a task together, and for some reason, he has some emotions and shows low enthusiasm for work. How do you handle this situation? Can you give an example? (4 points) Follow up: 1. What's wrong with this colleague? What's the impact on work? 2. How did you do it? 3. What was the result? The examiner can also ask questions randomly according to the answers. Topic intention: behavior topic. This topic examines candidates' interpersonal awareness and skills, focusing on their interpersonal skills and abilities, as well as their ability to build trust with colleagues. Scoring standard: Good: Have a sense of active cooperation, be good at communicating with others, and be able to take effective measures to promote work through understanding and support for others. English: Have a sense of cooperation, be able to communicate with each other, and basically take measures to deal with the relationship between the two sides without affecting their work. Poor: no sense of cooperation, no understanding of others, or ineffective measures may lead to the failure of work progress. 6. In your work experience, it may happen that there are contradictions or conflicts between your organizations (such as units, departments, classes, working groups, etc.). ) and another brother organization, it's up to you to solve it yourself. If yes, please give an example to illustrate the whole situation. (5 points) If you can give an example, ask: 1. What contradiction (problem) did you encounter at that time? 2. What is your task? 3. What measures have you taken? 4. What is the final effect? If you can't give an example, ask the candidate to assume that this is the case and ask him to talk about how to deal with the contradiction between the two organizations. Topic intention: behavioral question or situational question. Through the examinee's answers, we can understand his ability of organization and coordination, interpersonal communication, and especially his ability to solve contradictions among peer organizations. Scoring standard: Good: Candidates can have insight into problems and coordinate various relationships, consider problems comprehensively, grasp key points, take effective measures and express clearly. Chinese: Candidates can solve problems and the methods are basically effective; The organization is basically clear. Poor: poor organization and coordination ability in the organization's activities and poor work measures; The expression is incoherent. 7. Your director asked you to send an urgent letter to the Propaganda Department of the Communist Party of China, only to find that it was sent to the wrong unit the next day. He not only refused to take responsibility, but also angrily criticized you for being careless and not sending the materials to the Ministry of Culture as required. At this time, how can you express yourself without affecting your work and aggravating the contradiction between you and your leader? (3 points) Topic intention: situational questioning. This question is used to examine candidates' resilience and emotional stability. Candidates should find a reasonable solution to the problem as soon as possible under pressure, flexible and thoughtful. This question can also examine the ability and skills of candidates to deal with the relationship with superiors. Scoring standard: good: emotional stability, quick thinking and thoughtful. For example, I didn't give an explanation at that time, but I just took the time to remedy it and chose a more relaxed occasion to make an appropriate explanation later. China people: The mood is basically stable, and the reaction is basically appropriate. Poor: Emotional confusion, being at a loss, or improper solution. Argue with the leader. 8. Suppose you have several unfinished tasks at hand, but your superior has given you another task. You find it difficult to finish the work. How do you handle this contradiction? (This question is reserved, 3 points) Topic intention: Situational question. This question is used to examine candidates' interpersonal awareness and skills, mainly the ability to deal with ownership relations in the organization. Scoring standard: good: able to communicate well with people and have good communication methods and skills; Be able to express your views properly on the premise of respecting others. For example, leaders can be made to know that their current task is very heavy through appropriate methods, and they can put forward feasible suggestions to the leaders to complete the task. China: I can communicate with people. I have some communication methods and skills, and I can express my views appropriately. For example, leaders can be made aware of their difficulties. Poor: unable to communicate with others, lack of communication skills; It is difficult to express one's views. For example, leaders can't understand their own difficulties or directly contradict them. 9. Your written test score is average this time, and the interview situation is not outstanding. Do you think we will hire you? (3 points), ask appropriate questions: What do you think of the recruitment of civil servants? I heard you found someone to help you sort things out? Topic intention: situational problem. This question is intended to put pressure on candidates to examine their resilience, self-emotional control and self-confidence. Scoring standard: good: emotional stability, quick thinking, self-confidence, correct evaluation of yourself, and strive to properly highlight your own advantages and turn passivity into initiative. China people: Emotions tend to be stable after being controlled, and make a reasonable explanation for their own situation. Poor: at a loss, anxious to explain, incoherent or depressed, lacking self-confidence, fully agreeing with the examiner's point of view or denying the examiner's statement. There are tens of thousands of laid-off workers in Beijing, and their re-employment is a big problem. However, millions of foreigners work in Beijing every year, earning tens of billions of yuan. Please analyze the reasons for the difficulty of reemployment of laid-off workers and briefly talk about the solutions you think are appropriate. (5 points) Topic intention: The problem of intelligence. Through the discussion of complex social hot issues, the comprehensive analysis ability of candidates is examined, and the degree of attention of candidates to society is also examined to a certain extent. Be careful not to judge whether the candidate's point of view is correct, but mainly to see if it is reasonable. Scoring standard: Good: able to comprehensively analyze problems, clear arguments, adequate arguments, rigorous arguments, in-depth consideration of problems, unique opinions and reasonable words. Chinese: basically, the main aspects of the problem can be considered, and the arguments are appropriate and reasonable. Poor: one-sided consideration, improper argument and unreasonable argument. 1 1. At present, people hate corruption. The CPC Central Committee and the State Council attached great importance to the fight against corruption. What do you think of corruption? How do you think to eliminate corruption? (5 points) Topic intention: speculative question. Scoring standard: omitted. 12. Since the reform and opening up, Beijing's road traffic has been greatly improved, and expressway and road reconstruction and expansion projects have been completed every year. But the traffic jam in Beijing is still very serious. Please analyze the cause of traffic jam and briefly talk about the solution you think is appropriate. (This question is reserved, 5 points) Topic intention: speculative topic. Scoring standard: omitted.

China National Intellectual Property Administration February 25, 2004 Civil Servant Interview Question 1. Self-introduction II. Why did you apply for this position? 3. How to understand "never too old to learn"? What should I do if I hear someone say that you have a good friend who speaks ill of you behind your back? 5. After China's entry into WTO, what impact will it have on China? What is the impact on individuals? 6. Organize an activity: How to receive foreign affairs tour groups? How to move? 7. Your personal strengths and weaknesses. 8. What do you know about this position?

The Ministry of Agriculture interviewed civil servants in 2004 1. 2. Why do you hold this position? 3. Organize a tour and briefly describe the process. 4. The influence of joining WTO on China's economy. What will you do if your superiors have some habits that you can't stand? 6. What should I do if I know that the things assigned by the leaders are wrong? 7. Someone accused you of cheating in this exam. Do you have anything to say? 8. Do you have any questions?

/focus/official.html

/focus/gwyst/index.html

/gwyks/gwy-kqfd/msb kfd/index . htm

/new web/jiuye zhidao/jyzd-F2 . ASP？ lx=2

/

The above websites are all interview knowledge or examples, which I believe will be helpful to you.

Wish you success!