How is the strange phenomenon of radish recruitment formed?

As the name implies, "radish recruitment" means: a radish is a pit in the position of civil servants. Generally speaking, whether the job seeker's radish is suitable for the job requirements is the pit. The so-called "radish recruitment" is to tailor a pit for radish, so that other radishes have no way to go.

There are many reasons for this strange phenomenon. It is not surprising to say that it is strange, similar to "setting up posts for the people." The traditional employment system and concept in China is one of the main reasons for this phenomenon. Of course, the most fundamental reason is the high salary, high welfare and high security of civil servants, which leads to the extremely hot recruitment of civil servants. In order to ensure that the "second generation of officials" are successfully promoted to civil servants and even officials, the phenomenon of "radish recruitment" is inevitable.

According to experts' analysis, although the local Party committee and government have remedied and disposed of the recent incidents of "radish recruitment" (interviewee's note: referring to the second half of 20 10), the most important thing is to hold people accountable to the end. Recruitment and other practices can not be a "shield for exemption", let alone a "cover for accountability". First of all, who are you responsible for? Zou Rong, a professor at East China University of Political Science and Law and an expert in administrative law, said that, for example, in Lengshuijiang's "students entering the career establishment" incident, the staff of the municipal editorial office and other units directly handled were of course responsible, and the discipline inspection and supervision departments were already investigating the "relevant responsible personnel" according to the law. However, are the leaders of the municipal party Committee and the municipal government who personally give instructions also violating the rules and regulations, and are they also "responsible persons"? Zou Rong said that in September of 20 10, South Korea's Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Yoo Myung-hwan, resigned because of the "special recruit" daughter incident, which deserves our careful comparison. "If we are not responsible to the end, we will become a society without collective responsibility." Second, does "reinventing the wheel" cover up the responsibility? Zou Rong said that in many "radish recruitment" incidents, once the incident is exposed, the relevant responsible departments often cancel the previous recruitment, change the rules and start over. "But have they considered that it is appropriate for some poor children to take the exam through proper channels and finally pass the written exam, so that they can also' accompany the exam' and' take medicine'?" Zou Rong said, "The' reinvention' must not be a cover-up, and the previous' black-box operation' must be written off." Third, don't let "wage difference" and "can't keep people" become an excuse. Gu Jun, a professor and sociologist at Shanghai University, found that in many "radish recruitment" incidents, the explanations given by local officials were hard work, poor wages and salaries, and that local people and their families could work with peace of mind, and so on. "The post is not hard and the salary is not bad. This allows candidates to judge for themselves; Locals and family members of local cadres can work with peace of mind, which is obvious geographical discrimination and identity discrimination. " Gu Jun said, "Don't underestimate the common sense, IQ and judgment of the masses, otherwise it will become the laughing stock of the people." Fourth, we must pay attention to the "devil" of details. "Why do most of them happen in the recruitment of public institutions? Why are most of them interviewing? " Zou Rong explained that compared with the relatively standardized national civil service examination, there is no unified national law for the recruitment of public institutions, and all localities and departments have greater freedom. It is easier to introduce a "land policy" in this regard and regard public institutions as "private plots". After entering the recruitment process, the interview is more controllable and easier to score than the standardized written test. "I suggest reducing the weight of interview scores as much as possible. In a few minutes, what can the examiner ask and what level and ability can he see? Isn't there a probation period after employment? This kind of test is always more real than an interview. " Zou Rong said. Wang Xuejie, a professor at the Party School of Hunan Provincial Party Committee, said that "insider control" leads to recruitment alienation, taking advantage of power to take care of the interests of a few people, hurting social fairness and justice, hurting the interests of most people, and inevitably hurting the credibility of the government, leading to the "solidification" tendency of social classes. Experts pointed out that there is no shortage of institutional norms in open recruitment in China, and the current crux is "no shortage of systems and lack of implementation". Wang Xuejie said that although the system design basically ensures openness, transparency, fairness and justice, if a good system is not implemented and supervised, the system will become a decoration, and it is difficult to restrict "black-box operation" and abuse of power, which is worse than no system. Professor Gu Jun said that many "radish recruitment" incidents are not good in themselves, but it is good to be exposed by the Internet and the media. "It wasn't before, but now people have more means of supervision." Gu Jun said, "At the same time, we can't unilaterally rely on after-the-fact exposure. After all, these are just the tip of the iceberg, and they all have' late regrets'. The key to prevent and punish radish recruitment is to rely on system guarantee and implementation. The authority of the government comes from trust, and trust comes from the respect system. " [4]