Job Recruitment Website - Job information - Five argumentative essays on justice
Five argumentative essays on justice
An argumentative essay on justice: Maybe someone was born in a good family environment and received extraordinary treatment from an early age; Maybe some people are doomed to suffer and starve from the moment they open their eyes? In any case, it is better than resentment, because God is fair.
Born in a bustling city, you can certainly get a superior education, but born in a mountain village, don't cry. Because you can keep a perfect and pure heart, which is not available to everyone in the city. You know what satisfaction is. You don't need a thousand tons of gold. Just a new pen and a new book can make you smile, which is beyond our power.
God is fair, busy downtown, people come and go, traffic is busy. It has more towering buildings, but not the original tree-lined and clear streams. The students bowed their heads to do their homework and review, but no children were playing with fish and shrimp. Add all kinds of new cars, but the fresh air is covered by exhaust gas?
Sometimes you always say that you can't do anything by hiding in the village, and you can't be the president of a listed company. God is fair. He won't give you the position of president, and wants you to start as a junior clerk, not because he is stingy, but because he wants to exercise you and let you sit in this position by your own strength. He doesn't want you to think of some tens of thousands of disciples who inherited their father's footsteps but accomplished nothing. Only through wind and rain can flowers bear sweet and huge fruits.
It doesn't matter whether you are born in the city or stay in the mountain village, because? God is always fair.
The argumentative essay on justice has been deeply touched by reading history recently. Su Zhang, the secretariat of Jizhou in Eastern Han Dynasty? Today, I invited my friends to drink and talk about old feelings, and the Ming Dynasty held a court session to hear cases and enforce the law impartially? Will those corrupt friends get carried away at the family dinner? There is only one blue sky above people's heads, but I have two blue sky? Qinghe satrap was brought to justice and supported impartially? Blue sky? .
History continues and the times are developing. Crossing the historical sky, just visiting, should be deeply appreciated? Blue sky? , vigorously promote impartiality, make it more brilliant after years of tempering, and more Ming Che and Wan Li after the baptism of time and space.
Justice is a lofty ideological realm. It is a virtue that human beings will always admire, and it is a noble virtue that can exist between heaven and earth and compete with the sun and the moon. If a person has a just character, he can be aboveboard, seek truth from facts, uphold justice, promote good and eliminate evil. ? Is public health bright and local health dark? And then what? Where there is public interest, there must be justice. As the old saying goes, this is the case. Confucianism, which has a great influence on China's history and culture, has always advocated impartiality. Since ancient times, the world is public? 、? Justice? It has always been the ideal pursued by advanced people. Those selfless people will always go down in history and will always be remembered by then and later generations. Those who abuse power for personal gain and pervert the law will always be condemned and despised. ? The world is public? 、? Public-private relationship, the foundation of survival? The spirit of impartial law enforcement and unselfishness is an excellent tradition of our nation and a valuable asset of our ideological and political construction today.
Justice is a basic moral quality. Yao Shun abdicated, praised the virtuous, and criticized the son, expounding the moral quality of being honest and clean, and distinguishing between public and private. In essence, selflessness is the ethical principle of fairness and justice in dealing with interpersonal relationships, the most basic wisdom in modulating all relations among family, society, country and all mankind, and the value orientation that producers of * * * should pursue and possess; Corruption is the fundamental denial and the greatest trampling on justice. The fundamental purpose of the party is to serve the people wholeheartedly, and serving the people wholeheartedly is selfless. The distinction between justice and public and private has always been an important part of the party's ideological construction, and it is also in an important position in the new socialist concept of honor and disgrace. The reason why corrupt elements are corrupt is that selfish greed expands, and they can't always sound the alarm, and eventually they become black sheep and are despised by the world. Therefore, we should continue to strengthen the study of political theory, be strict in discipline, strengthen self-cultivation, always be impartial, distinguish between public and private, and contribute to the party's eternal vitality.
Justice is the moral basis of politics. The ancients expounded the connotation of official morality from different angles. What was emphasized first? Justice? . Shangshu said:? Will the people allow the public to destroy the private? ,? Without parties and parties, is the king vacillating? ; Huai Nanzi said:? Impartiality, a word with everyone? . So-called? Is it guilty for the prince and the common people to break the law? And so on, all embody the spirit of being fair and not selfish, impartial and not selfish. Many honest officials in history, such as Bao Zheng and Hai Rui, have been regarded as role models for officials for thousands of years. Justice is the basic requirement of political morality. Therefore, we should vigorously advocate impartiality, always adhere to impartiality in practical work, regardless of personal interests or personal considerations. Only in this way can we be selfless, confident, block all kinds of pressure and resist all kinds of temptations; Only in this way can we go forward bravely and be invincible, and truly undertake the historical mission entrusted to us by society and the times.
The third part of the argumentative essay on justice read the class record of a professor in the philosophy department of Harvard University some time ago. The content is justice and the class is very long. I only read a little. This course has caused a lot of thinking. Usually, we will encounter similar moral problems in our lives. We will have different choices in different situations, thus constructing complex philosophical problems. For example, a train is driving at a high speed, there are five workers in front, and there is a person on the other road. You can choose to bump into one person. There's another one. There is a super fat man next to you. You can choose to push him down and block the train. What would you choose? Many people chose the first question without hesitation? Sacrifice one person to save five people? The second question, this statement is not valid. The essence of this problem has not changed, but different ways of thinking and situations make us have different judgments. So can our justice and moral philosophy be compared?
It will never be clear to link this topic with philosophy, so simply talk about justice without philosophy.
The topic of justice is something we have been thinking about, and everyone has thought about it more or less. Why am I here? . Even I often hear many people complain: I wish I were xxx, the world is unfair. Each of us has a different fate from birth. People with different fates will be intertwined, and everyone is at different levels. Thus, there is the topic of contrast and justice.
Is God fair to us? Sometimes I also think about this problem. Some people are born in rich families and enjoy a luxurious life, while others can't get rid of poverty. They have to shoulder the heavy responsibility entrusted by their families since childhood. Some people can generally rely on an excellent school with a family background, and some people are squeezed by people with backgrounds when their grades are obviously enough. Some people are born with extraordinary talents, while others are doomed to be mediocre all their lives. God gave everyone a different personality and appearance. From the beginning, it seems that fate has been doomed, and no amount of efforts can reverse it. Those who live in wealthy families from the beginning can find comfortable jobs easily, while those who are as poor as a church mouse, even if they try their best to get into famous universities, have to rush to various job fairs with their diplomas. Such a scene will inevitably make us sigh whether heaven is just, but if we think from another angle, this question seems to have a different answer.
Those rich people will live a comfortable life forever until the day they die. Let him look back at the life they have lived. He should regret that he never struggled and lived vigorously. And those poor people, even if they didn't get a good life when they died, must have no regrets when they look back on their past struggles. Whatever the outcome, at least they struggled and didn't make a trip to the world in vain.
See a friend write down his busy life on Weibo, and then say? This is the attitude that young people should have. ? Life is full, and I walk in the busy everyday. Although I will feel very tired and have sequelae in the end, I have at least worked hard for my dream. People with dreams are the loveliest. We should strive while we are young, so as not to regret it later.
In fact, everyone will feel unfair more or less, because there is no fairness at all. But please clap your chest and ask yourself: Do you feel happy now? Do you have a complete and warm family, though not rich? Do you have a group of friends who will always be with you? Do you have so many kind elders? Have you ever had a few things that make you happy? If you answer all your questions, then you have no right to feel unfair, because you have enough, and you have no reason to complain about anyone or anything. Because you know, in many corners of the world, there are even people who have never owned these. You shouldn't complain about anything, you can only think about whether you can try to make things better.
Because people are different, there is contrast and justice. Different people have different views on the same thing, and justice is relative. Therefore, there is no need to feel the problem of justice. God gives everyone the same thing, but different mentality will have different views.
Therefore, the most important thing is to have a good attitude and not to die out in the secular world.
Click the next page to share more argumentative papers about justice.
- Previous article:How about Shenzhen Pingdi Ji Zheng Electronics?
- Next article:Is Weihai east china numerical control Co., Ltd. a listed company?
- Related articles
- What is the class of Novotel Rizhao Suning?
- Does Zhong Jun Wan Yu have a subsidiary in Chongqing?
- Shenyang water leakage detection telephone
- How about Shenzhen Tai Ding Jia Chuang Technology Co., Ltd.
- 20 17 public recruitment announcement of state-owned enterprises in luqiao district, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province
- Is Anqing Hengjiang Electric Power OK?
- Shenzhen Yijian Examination Time 2022
- How does Xuzhou subway recruitment website prompt that it does not meet the recruitment conditions?
- "Emergency High Score Reward" on Tang Hai's Job Search
- Fusui massage recruitment