Which is more promising, applied mathematics or applied physics?

Applied physics and applied mathematics are equally promising. But in real life, it is easier to find a good job in applied mathematics if you only study undergraduate. (statistics. Banking. ......................................................................................................................................................................, an accountant, but many creative companies recruit students majoring in physics and related fields. The only regret is that most of them recruit graduate students and above, and of course there are people with no academic qualifications, but you are required to have any extraordinary inventions, what kind of project research you have done before, and what achievements you have (there are almost no such people for ordinary undergraduates). If you are only an undergraduate, it is better to choose applied mathematics. If you are vengeful, you should choose applied physics, but you should be mentally prepared. At present, it is even more difficult to publish any powerful papers in physics, because physics requires high thinking, not only to master mathematics, but also to have extraordinary physical thinking, so most scientists engaged in physics will have psychological diseases to some extent. If you don't believe me, you can check it online. However, the direction of physics is very wide, so the results of mathematics and physics are similar at present, but don't choose too difficult direction to study, otherwise it will be very depressing. For example, you can check the results of variable function and complex variable function, because the difficulty is great and the gap is amazing. Personally, I can't influence your decision. Regardless of real life, whether you choose physics or mathematics, it is actually the same, because physics and mathematics are closely related. In history, mathematics and physics always go hand in hand, and one selflessly or forcibly promotes the development of the other. A physicist is also a mathematician, and a mathematician is also a physicist. The development of physics needs more powerful mathematical tools, and the development of modern mathematics also needs thinking tools (modeling). Descartes perfected the experimental conclusion of Galileo's law (the relationship between force and motion), and Newton Blietz created the calculus algorithm. There are many similar things. Personally, I think there are no absolute physicists and mathematicians. So in the end, what subject do I think is promising? Let's take a look at your actual situation (which subject do you prefer) and real life to decide! No matter which road you choose, it is bumpy and tortuous, but it is also bright and infinite. My motivation to engage in scientific research comes from an irresistible desire to understand the mysteries of nature, not any other purpose. Einstein's bounden duty is to explore the truth bravely. -Copernicus If this comet really comes back in 1758 according to my prediction, the fair descendants will probably not refuse to admit that it was first discovered by an Englishman. -Elmont Harley 1727 On March 20th, Newton died, and the English poet Pope wrote in his inscription: "Nature and its laws are hidden in the dark night sky; God said,' Let Newton be born', and everything is bright. "