Do you think premature retirement is a waste of talents?

Nowadays, the employment pressure of young people is particularly great. Some people advocate that retirement is too early and the market is too wasteful. Development is like a wheel. As long as the front wheel reaches the destination, the rear wheel has the possibility to reach the destination.

Although this sentence is a bit cruel, it is a bloody reality.

At present, the elderly put them in a high position, unable to retire or unwilling to give up their rights at all.

For example, the executives of enterprises or the presidents of companies have always been in their own positions, and young people have no chance to climb up. At retirement age, it is a guarantee for young people.

Some netizens said that polarization is serious at this stage.

We retired at 60. As a result, you say here that it is too early to retire at the age of 60, but if you lose your job at the age of 35, many enterprises will not want it at all.

Even if it is necessary, it is also some "three noes" enterprises or some particularly small and micro enterprises, and there is no way to pay five insurances and one gold.

So it is very contradictory whether we are re-employed at the age of 35 or unemployed after the age of 60.

We also want to continue working, but the company doesn't want us, and we can't help it.

In addition, some extreme netizens said, I agree with what this expert said, and I also agree with this expert's point of view.

Let's just say that experts set an example and will work until the day they die, and then retire.

If you really do this, we will admit that it is too early to retire at this stage, and then we will continue to work hard and continue to work hard.

If you can't lead by example, it is somewhat unreliable to draw conclusions just by touching your mouth.

realize

There is a 90-year-old grandfather in our university who is still in the re-employment stage.

Old people can only walk in wheelchairs and even speak fluently, but the school is still subsidizing the elderly. Why?

According to a teacher in our school who has a good relationship with me, this old man has relations with many great literary writers in the last century.

Schools or some literary examples represented by related great literary writers often invite the elderly to attend meetings.

The old man is too old to fly and even has problems walking, so he will give more places to his students.

In the words of our teacher, as long as the old man works in our school for one day, his education in our school will be able to by going up one flight of stairs and give more young people strength and opportunities.

For such a special group, we are certainly willing to let them postpone their retirement for a period of time, and it is best for the elderly to live to be over 100 years old.

Then 100 years old, the name has been hanging in the school. In this way, for our school, at least there will be 10 to 20 years in the future, and we can enjoy the invitation of the world's top literary resources.

But for ordinary workers or the vast majority of ordinary people in society, delaying retirement is not necessary.

Because most people are 60 or 65 years old, it's time to retire.