Is there a difference between employees who have signed contracts with institutions but have not compiled them and those who have compiled them?

There are many kinds of contract work points, including "government employees" who directly sign contracts with employers and "dispatch workers" who sign contracts with labor dispatch companies. In either case, when you go in, your work content is not much different from that of the staff, only it needs to be signed. Of course, if something goes wrong, no matter whether you are inside or outside the staff, the signers will bear the responsibility together. Needless to say, there will be a gap in wages, but in some special fields, the wages of people outside the establishment may be higher than those in the establishment. Of course, there are many special benefits in the establishment (performance awards, car subsidies, communication subsidies, various subsidies, and holiday benefits of trade unions). This depends on regional differences and different departments. In fact, if you are a government worker, the difference between you and the establishment staff is only wages and benefits, and it is still a little different from temporary workers.

To put it bluntly, it is money and development.

In most cases, there is less money (in a few cases, there is more money)

There is basically no development, and it is impossible to hold major leadership positions (in fact, most of them cannot be held at the same time)