How does the structured interview of civil servants impress the examiner?

For the interview exam, many candidates want to show their best side, so they will pack themselves as much as possible, cover up their inner panic with serious expressions, and cover up the lack of content depth with gorgeous rhetoric, but it is difficult to get good results. Above the examination room, it is difficult for the interviewer to have a good impression on the candidates with stiff expressions and flashy answers. On the contrary, what the examiner wants to see is a generous, enthusiastic and sincere candidate, who has a smile and expression when communicating, whose body movements are naturally coordinated, who can sincerely express his true feelings about the topic and reflect in-depth thinking. The routine answer of "being tall" is not as good as the sincere answer of "grounding gas".

Second, be meticulous and thorough.

The analysis of the problem should be detailed and thorough. On the one hand, we should pay attention to some topics with scenes and roles. For example, a student in a primary school suddenly vomited and diarrhea, and asked you what to do as a staff member of the Education Bureau. For this question, don't be too anxious to answer questions, such as sending students to the hospital and contacting parents. We should combine the identity in the topic, and as the staff of the Education Bureau, we should contact the school at this time, give instructions to the school and guide the next action, in order to meet our identity and responsibilities. On the other hand, the analysis of current political topics should be deepened. For example, a middle school affiliated to a university has recruited more than a dozen doctoral students as teachers. Many people will analyze whether this matter is a waste of talents, but in addition, we should also see the current imbalance of educational resources. Only by focusing on problems and seeing deeper social problems can we reflect the depth of thinking.

Third, matching work.

When answering questions in the interview, although they are analyzed and answered around the topic, candidates must remember to reflect their matching degree with the position at the right time. For example, when analyzing the purpose of the topic, in addition to the general methods such as dialectical analysis and causal analysis, you can also talk about your own examples. , so as to highlight their own advantages, or combined with the appropriate analysis of the positions applied for, reflecting the matching of people and posts. When talking about how to do it around the problem of the stem, in addition to solving the problems in the stem, you can also talk about what you will do in the end and what you should pay attention to in combination with your upcoming post, so as to reflect your thinking about the post and let the examiner see the potential of the candidates.