Which is better, power mill or cimatron?

Each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and belongs to software with rich strategies.

2. Flexible operation,

I don't quite understand this meaning.

3. easy to use.

Of course, Powermill is easier to learn.

4. The user base is wider.

Cimatron has been rooted in China for many years and has a wider user base.

5.R&D has more stamina.

In fact, these two companies happen to be active and innovative companies in the field of CAM. On the whole, cimatron is more innovative. Like 3d-step, surface parting, fast electrode and fast drilling, cimatron was the first to make it, followed by powermill.

Moreover, there is another leading thing like cimatron, but other CAM softwares haven't. It is estimated that it will follow up soon. It is the five-axis machining of deep cavity machining, that is, the three-axis machining strategy is adopted at the beginning, and the five-axis linkage is automatically used at the deep cavity. The basic trajectory is still similar to the original three-axis strategy. Different from the general five-axis machining, it follows almost all three-axis machining strategies. This technology, as everyone who has visited the machine tool exhibition knows, is now emphasizing efficiency. What can be done in three axes must be done in five axes for speed. Cimatron has just adapted to this trend, and it is very simple to use it to do this.

Cimaton*** released three versions: IT, Elite and QuickNC. QuickNC should be used to compete with powermill. Intelligent and simple processing, coupled with easy 2D sketching and processing, will win many markets.

Powermill is also an innovative company, such as racing line processing, cycloidal 3D rough machining and so on. The disadvantage is that the powershape of CAD is not very convenient. After all, everyone is used to the style of Pro/E, UG and CATIA, and this traditional style is becoming more and more unacceptable. In addition, if you do 2D processing, the efficiency is also low. It always gives people a sense of substitution of XXX function of XXX software. It is difficult to be truly independent. (XXX means that some software users find that some functions of powermill are very good, so they will use powermill instead when they need it in the future, but they still use the original software at other times. )