Will the interviewer pay attention to the applicant's undergraduate school?

What are the skills that can improve the interview success rate for recent college graduates?

Everyone in the workplace has experienced interviews, big and small, and the process of fighting wits and playing games with interviewers can be described as sour and refreshing. Sometimes I feel good about myself, but in the end I can't escape the fate of being brushed. I don't know what the problem is after thinking about it.

In fact, in order to stand out from the interview successfully, besides excellent ability, you need to find out some thoughts of the interviewers.

- what kind of candidates do they prefer? -Which candidates do they dislike the most? -How can I skillfully deal with the interviewers' questions?

especially for the new and new people who have just entered the workplace, how can they behave more calmly and get their favorite offer smoothly in the face of countless HR readers?

-

The interview is really an interesting scene.

The candidate Lao Wang sells melons for fear that the interviewer will not know how good he is;

The interviewer is picky in the egg white, for fear of not seeing the candidate's minor faults.

everyone talked happily, but there was no news in the end. I really don't understand why interviewers "say one thing and do another"? I really can't read and understand their "talk in words".

if you give up in this way, it's really naive. For young people who are new to the workplace, it is normal to be "routine" when entering the "pit".

do you really understand the minds of experienced HR people?

1. What kind of people are most annoying to interviewers?

What the interviewer fears most is not the candidates with low ability. Generally, you can get a general idea by reading your resume. In addition, the organization will also recruit some people with average ability, otherwise it will recruit a group of elites in the workplace. Who will do the work? Therefore, what annoys the interviewer most is ......

- obviously low ability and lack of objective self-cognition; -Candidates who know their weight and brag about their abilities. -It's a very life-consuming thing, is it? !

on the one hand, if what he says is very realistic, you have to consume a lot of brain cells to tell that he is pretending to be X ..

You know, the interview is actually a very energy-consuming thing. Interviewers should talk to you smoothly → extract key clues from your answers and identify logical conflicts, so as to identify whether you are lying at the first time → At the same time, they should think about the next question, so as not to make the interview cold ..... reasonable, which is not simple at all. On the other hand, even if HR recognizes that the other person is lying in the first sentence, it can't drive people away, can it? People who invite themselves have to finish crying. You have to pretend to be calm and pretend that you don't know anything to accompany you to finish this journey. Finally, I would like to ask politely:

- Is there anything else you want to ask me? -If you pass the interview, we will inform you of the second interview within one week.

For example, last time a child's shoes came to interview our UI designer, and graduated from China Geo University (full-time column on the interview registration form: Yes! ! ! ）。 I glanced at the interview registration form and quickly determined that this person was deceiving me with a fake degree. The calligraphy level of the second grade in this primary school doesn't match the language expression ability of the latter language, thinking that I don't know how difficult it is to get into Beijing from this big college entrance examination province?

I asked the topic of the college thesis several times, but I forgot to answer it in one answer. I forgot the topic of my thesis two years after graduation, but I said I didn't remember it without thinking. Are you sure the children's shoes are not for fun? The interviewer's brain should run at a high speed and always maintain authority and professionalism; While smiling, I still have to watch your outfit quietly, and seeing the move makes you full of loopholes. After all this tossing, the brain is tired and the heart is more tired. Just waste time chatting with you, after all, HR still has to eat the interview. However, such behavior is actually insulting the IQ and professionalism of an HR.

As I mentioned above, the children's shoes are probably forced to be full-time by a part-time undergraduate. This is often recognized at a glance by most experienced hiring managers. In fact, I didn't talk that day. I thought there was something fishy about him at first sight. No matter in which industry, which enterprise, and which position, integrity is always at the forefront.

As a job candidate, you may not know that once you are questioned by the interviewer, even if you are competent enough for the job, you won't be wanted, because he doesn't know what else you are hiding and covering up. So, stop thinking about how to deceive the interviewer, be simple and speak in a simple way. Interview is not a kind of transaction, after all, buying and selling can't be righteous.

second, what kind of people does the interviewer like?

if I boast that you will question it, well, what about my self-deprecation? Will interviewers also habitually question? This is a very interesting phenomenon. When people think that others can benefit from the ideas they advocate, they will doubt the credibility of this person. At this time, even if his views are objective, people will not believe them. Just like "Pharaoh sells melons and boasts himself", must her melons be neither sweet nor sandy? No, no, no. Walster(1966) found that the persuasion effect is best if the opinions supported by the subjects are unfavorable to them.

In the experiment of persuading criminals and local prosecutors to "increase or decrease the power of law enforcement officers", when prosecutors asked for increasing the power of law enforcement officers, the persuasiveness decreased obviously;

When a criminal demands to increase the power of law enforcement officers, his influence is far greater than his persuasiveness when he demands to reduce the power of law enforcement officers.

in other words, when you try to persuade someone, it will be better if you can say something that is contrary to your own interests.

Especially in the face of numerous interviewers, if you can grasp this flexibly, it will have a surprise effect. Because the vast majority of professional interviewers have brushed many candidates face to face, after experiencing the baptism of thousands of people, they have become immune to the expression and performance of all kinds of candidates. It is absolutely difficult to get them to change their evaluation of the candidates. When the interviewer thinks that he is more professional and has a general judgment on the candidate, if you are still delusional, trying to convince him through high-intensity speech skills will backfire. For example, how excellent the candidate forcibly expresses himself. If you miss me, you will miss the whole world. Well, congratulations on being blacklisted by the interviewer. Take your time:)

So ... How about trying to be stupid? Yes, you are not mistaken, you are playing dumb! The trick of playing dumb is to gain the interviewer's trust by saying that you are "stupid", thus reducing his defensive psychology and allowing him to recognize "your positive evaluation of yourself". Of course, the first point is to "create opportunities to shift from all kinds of interview questions to saying that you are stupid." For example, you will always face the question: evaluate yourself in three words? ? Why can you get a scholarship/honor as an excellent employee? Why are you developing so fast? ? Why did you say you could blend in with your colleagues? ? I see your resume says * * *, how do you do this job well? ? Can you share your biggest gain in these years?

at this time, you can answer accordingly: I think "learning ability", "innovation ability" and "stupidity" can best represent me? Maybe it's because I'm stupid? Because I'm more real, and sometimes I'm a little stupid, right? I think it's better to be practical or even stupid to do this job better? Whether doing things or being a person, it will be better to be stupid

and the interviewer will definitely wonder, "Why do you say this?" You can answer selectively from the following reference answers: ① The question about "Why do you get achievements and do a good job?"

This stupidity should reflect

Give a chestnut:

When I first arrived at the position of * *, I was a novice, and my leader was also a sheep-herding manager. I was completely blind to my work. At that time, I thought, sort out my work and see what kinds of tasks I often face. So I spent about a week sorting out the * big category * small category of the resignation interview form (or so-and-so file) in the past year, and classified and coded different situations. After counting and counting these nearly * * * * documents one by one, the table I compiled can grade and evaluate the resignation of different people and the resignation in a certain period. If someone asks to leave again and enters the job number information, they will know the urgency of the situation and how to deal with it ..... So, when I became a full-time probationary employee at the end of the year, I also got the department's outstanding employee of the year. I think it doesn't matter if you are stupid, as long as you do the basic work solidly, in fact, the work is traceable.

② The question "Why do you get everyone's approval and become one with your classmates and colleagues?"

This stupidity should reflect

Give me a chestnut:

Actually, I'm not the kind of person who is familiar with it, but I think I'm sincere. I am willing to help others. Whenever I see others have any difficulties, I will be very sad if I don't ask. Moreover, if there is any good news or information, I am willing to share it with others at the first time. Over time, I feel that everyone is also very kind to me. Of course, if you say you have been hurt, there must be. But most people around me are nice and considerate. I think you will gain a lot of friends as long as you think more about others. As for why you are a monitor, in fact, no one in the university wants to be a monitor. Everyone has their own personality, and it is particularly difficult to organize an activity, often sandwiched between schools, teachers and classmates to make a sandwich bread. However, someone has to do this job, and everyone has given it to me, which is a trust in me. I can't let you down. So there's nothing wrong with paying more. Of course, some people will call me stupid, and I think it's worth it.

(3) The question "Why have you achieved what others can't achieve?"

This stupidity should be reflected in

Give a chestnut:

Nowadays people are impetuous, and they always see the rewards and achievements immediately after giving. And I feel that the return cycle of many things in the world is not so fast, so I will be willing to take root in my chosen field and make myself a qualified person according to my own plan. That's what I always do at school. For example, I got excellent grades in CET-6, but in fact, I didn't spend much time on English, but I seriously learned from freshman to senior. I think this language is very important to me, so I never gave up. In this way, I persisted and got 7 points in IELTS. When people ask me what you know, I really don't, just 3 minutes a day. When I was a freshman, my English teacher said that "persistence is the most important thing in learning a language". In fact, I didn't create a certain learning method. Maybe I'm more obedient and stupid. So I think sometimes ability is not the most critical. You have to be stupid and be willing to work hard to make up for the shortcomings in ability.

I believe that if you answer the questions carefully with the above ideas, you should leave a good impression on HR. However, in order to make you pass the interviewer's screening successfully, I hope you can find a real example from your own life and make yourself a truly responsible person.

third, is "playing dumb" really just a "black skill"?

If you think "playing dumb" is a "black skill", it's a bit shallow. In fact, the stupidity we mentioned above is obviously not really stupid, but a manifestation of personality. This dimension of personality can be generally understood as responsibility, and also translated into conscientious, rigorous, earnest, controlling and impartial. As a dimension of "Big Five Personality", it reflects the degree of individual diligence, prudence, perseverance, self-discipline and orderliness. Responsibility is the most stable and effective predictor of performance among the top five personalities.

It is probably a trait-oriented motivation variable that many industrial and organizational psychologists have been seeking for a long time. The predictive power of the other four factors is limited to specific occupational groups or performance indicators. Responsibility is positively related to performance in most professional fields, but there are some exceptions, such as artists who need highly creative work. The high sense of responsibility in these areas is negatively related to performance. Therefore, playing dumb is a very scientific way to package yourself, which can help you stand out in the interview.

but ...... HR people are also critical. If you are really empty-handed, it is bound to be difficult to muddle through.