Urgent! Enterprises should put morality first! debate competition

Morality first: In the final analysis, the competition of enterprises is the competition of talents, and the employment of enterprises cannot be separated from talents. Therefore, enterprises often put their own culture and skills in an important position when recruiting personnel. "Talent is wealth" and "talent is everything" seems to be a kind of knowledge for employers and job seekers in enterprises and institutions. Regarding the definition of talents, the annotation of Modern Chinese Dictionary is: "People with both ability and political integrity have certain specialties". It can be seen that the biggest feature of "talents" is "having both ability and political integrity". No talent without virtue is not an ideal talent, and no talent without virtue is not a qualified talent. If the employer only pays attention to the so-called talents or skills, but ignores the moral quality that he should have as a person, the result is often counterproductive. This is a real case: an enterprise recruits two salesmen, Wang He and Liu. After two months' work, Xiao Wang, a rookie, brought a lot of profits to the company with his outstanding talent, and won the envy of his colleagues and the appreciation of his boss. The boss praised her many times at the meeting and cultivated her into a business backbone. In order to realize her personal desire as soon as possible, she tried to please the boss blindly, looked at his face, acted cautiously, tried to figure out his psychology, flattered him and won his favor. It wasn't long before she took the position of business manager. At this time, her true colors gradually surfaced, and she was arrogant and made much ado about nothing, which caused serious estrangement and contradiction between various departments, made a good company in a mess and caused huge losses to the enterprise. But compared with Xiao Wang, Xiao Liu is down-to-earth, kind, dedicated and honest to his work, never striving for fame and gain, and ready to help others. Although he was not reused, he still tried his best to do his job well, which not only created economic benefits for the enterprise, but also won recognition from everyone for his excellent moral character and being good at being a man, which made his enterprise win praise from customers and the industry. There has always been controversy about the choice of "virtue" and "talent". There is a saying that when dealing with troubled times, you need to "take the lead"; In peacetime, "virtue" should be put in the first place. In a sense, although this statement makes sense, it always makes people feel biased. "Virtue" is fundamental and long-term, and cannot be created overnight. Virtue is like a steering wheel, and talent is like an engine. A person without virtue, like a car without a steering wheel, will go astray. The greater the engine horsepower, the greater the harm. In this regard, Kong Old Master Q's point of view is: "Governing the country by virtue, such as Beichen living in its place, the stars arch it." Sima Guang also told Song Shenzong in the first volume of Zi Tong Zhi Jian that talent and morality are different, and the relationship between them is "talent and morality are also capital; Germany is handsome. " It is pointed out that only when Desheng is called a "gentleman" can Desheng be called a "villain". Turning a page of history, people with "talent" but no "virtue" often accomplish nothing or lose their reputation. For example, talented Jiang Lang, Qin Gui, who was spurned by ten thousand people, and so on. As early as 1957, the famous Samsung Group began to propose that the basis for openly selecting talents is personality, intelligence and health. When Li Bingzhe is the chairman, he chooses people first, and then talents. They ask employees to learn to be human first. There is an old saying in China that being a man before doing things is the basis of doing things. If people don't do well, they will do bad things. Italian poet Dante has a famous saying: a person with incomplete knowledge can make up for it with morality, but it is difficult for a person with incomplete morality to make up for it with knowledge. Therefore, both enterprises and institutions should have both ability and political integrity, and the practice of overemphasizing talents and ignoring morality is not conducive to the growth of talents and the long-term development of the cause.

As a modern enterprise, in today's big market economy, shopping malls are like battlefields, so it is necessary to select people who are competent for their jobs, so as to better develop the enterprise. As for virtue, it should be a personal matter. As long as it doesn't interfere with the work, the selection of people is of course the second place, and the selection of people is of course the use of talents. The business world is like a battlefield. What is a battlefield? It's just smoke billowing and danger lurking. If you are not careful, you will lose your life! People try their best to deal with you, but you think I am a noble person. I won't move if people don't touch me. If someone touches me, I will bear it! Will this work?

Questioning how fierce the market competition is now can not be solved by virtue. I would like to ask another debater, No.2, when you write your resume, will you focus on how many good things you have done, or will you focus on what talents and skills you have and your major? Because the company recruits talents, not philanthropists. I'd like to ask my opponent's second debater again: when interviewing new people, do companies always choose talents first in the initial test? The answer is yes, that is to say, people without talent or lower than others can't pass the first level at all. The so-called first, of course, is the first, only after the first level, the company will examine your virtue. Enterprises put talents in the first place in order to create profits with talents. The survival of enterprises is not charity. Only by raising a group of virtuous people can the enterprise not stagnate. For example, a respected Taoist priest has a very high morality, but what contribution can he make to the enterprise? Does the enterprise need to spend a lot of money to hire him to sweep the floor? What is an enterprise and what is an interest? Enterprises need to create benefits. How can they create benefits without talent?

Furthermore: how can there be virtue without talent? Educated people are definitely better than uneducated people, which shows that morality should be based on the cultivation of cultural knowledge. A person who doesn't know whether to go to the public toilet or not will definitely urinate everywhere. When selecting a person for an enterprise, we should first pay attention to your academic qualifications, not the so-called moral character, because talent is the embodiment of moral character, and what we call talent also includes moral character, so talent is the premise of moral character. Without talent, there is no moral character. So what kind of people do enterprises choose? The answer is: gifted scholar!