What should we do about QQ and 36 War?

judge for yourself, don't give it to others for free, and you will be sold and help others count money.

Kaspersky and Rising VS 36

Rivals of the same trade have turned against each other

When it comes to Jinshan, we can't help but mention the allusions of 36 and "old rivals" Kaspersky and Rising.

In p>22, Kaspersky, a Russian antivirus software, entered China, but it has not been able to effectively develop the market. In July 26, Kaspersky cooperated with the newly established 36 security department, and the two were bundled into one. 36 security guards provided free services such as killing malware, system diagnosis and repair for netizens, and Kaspersky provided free use activation codes for half a year. In less than a year, Kaspersky and 36 security guards both entered the top three security products. However, this pair of "good partners" parted ways after they announced their entry into the anti-virus market on July 36, 28, and Kabbah publicly announced the suspension of the cooperative relationship with 36.

in June, 21, Zhang Lishen, managing director of Kaspersky Asia Pacific, published an open letter to Zhou Hongyi, complaining bitterly about Zhou Hongyi's remarks of "hurting" Kaspersky in recent years, and urging him to "turn back". In October, Kaspersky said that 36 didn't understand the profession and unscrambled the "super factory" virus at random. 36 announced that it would sue Kaspersky.

The enmity between Rising and 36 is similar to that of other antivirus software manufacturers. In July, 27, when Zhou Hongyi announced that it would launch free anti-virus software, Rising's response was the most intense. It sent four emails to the media one day, criticizing "36 spoiler", and then the two sides had a fight over the "manslaughter" incident. Since then, it has never been broken.

Ke Niu VS 36

Fu Sheng and Zhou Hongyi's * * * have the same point

Ke Niu Company in Tencent camp has a complicated role. Some people say that it is the "vest" of Jinshan Company. It is said that the two companies are inextricably linked at the capital level and are merging. However, this news has not been officially confirmed by Jinshan or Keniu Company.

Some people say that there is a shadow of 36 on the cow because of Fu Sheng.

In March p>26, Zhou Hongyi became the chairman of Qihoo Company. At that time, 36 Security Guard was just a small project that was not paid attention to in the company. The whole team was less than 1 people, led by Fu Sheng. In July, 36 security guards were officially launched, and the growth was gratifying. In March 28, 36 security guard has become the core business of the company. Zhou Hongyi separated 36 from Qihoo and set up an independent company to operate, and Fu Sheng became the general manager of the new company. Fu Sheng should have accompanied 36 to grow up all the time, but in August 28, when Zhou Hongyi announced that he would enter the free anti-virus, Fu Sheng left sadly. It is said that the two sides have different ideas and lost the motivation to continue cooperation.

After leaving 36, Fu Sheng is gearing up to launch "Cow Virus" after an 18-month non-competition agreement with 36. Unexpectedly, on the evening of May 25th, 36 security guards intercepted the cow antivirus that had just been released for 5 minutes. This time, Fu Sheng was really angry. He sent a series of questions to Zhou Hongyi through the Internet, denouncing "cyber hegemony".

Fu Sheng tried to challenge 36 by killing virus with Keniu, but he was stopped by his own 36 students. This can't help but remind people that Zhou Hongyi also strangled himself through 36 security guards and founded 3721. From this point of view, the two are still somewhat similar. On October 29th, Zhou Hongyi launched "buttoning bodyguards" to keep an eye on QQ. At the same time, Fu Sheng immediately jumped on it and launched "361 Special Police" to kill 36 security guards.

Baidu VS 36

Since 3721, Baidu has made an enemy

This time, Baidu openly stood in the Tencent camp, of course, not because of its close relationship with Tencent. Its logic may be more appropriately explained by "the enemy of the enemy is a friend". I am afraid that the feud between Baidu and 36 can be traced back to the "Chinese Internet access" in the 3721 era, and the vicious battle with Baidu in the 36 anti-malware period. Since then, Zhou Hongyi and Li Yanhong, two industry leaders, have become rivals who have never been in contact with each other.

Those things are old sesame seeds and rotten millet. The two sides must be fighting for the immediate interests now-Baidu and 36 are entangled in two lawsuits.

In August this year, Baidu filed a claim with the court for 1 million yuan from Beijing Qizhi Software, which belongs to 36 security guards, on the grounds of copyright infringement and unfair competition. Qizhi Software, where 36 is located, also sued Baidu for "not promoting 36 browser as agreed", claiming an amazing amount of 54 million yuan. Industry insiders told national business daily that the most fundamental problem in the dispute between Baidu and 36 is not the above contract problem, but the threat of 36 expansion, especially its covet of Baidu's core business "search".

the enmity between 36 camp and TX

Shanda vs. Tencent, the battle in Baidu's game literature field

In the war of words caused by the dispute between 36 and Tencent, Shanda was the first to show its position.

at the beginning of October, Shanda released an announcement called "36 Security Guard Security Reminder" on the official website of its game "Eternal Tower", saying that "in view of the recent report released by 36 Security Guard, Tencent QQ has the problem of infringing users' privacy. We remind you to close QQ first when entering your account password, paying for recharging, and having a private conversation to ensure the safety of your personal information. "

Shanda obviously targeted Tencent, mainly because after Tencent unexpectedly surpassed Shanda and took the top spot in its hot online game industry, Shanda was overtaken by Netease in the second quarter of this year, and its ranking fell to third place, holding back a lot of grievances. Seeing that tencent games's market share continued to increase, Shanda continued to decline, and Shanda had to take this opportunity to vent his anger first.

There are also many frictions between Shanda and Baidu. In particular, Shanda Literature claimed to be "desperate" with Baidu since its birth. At the beginning of this year, Shanda Literature filed a lawsuit for the piracy of Baidu Post Bar. One of the most eye-catching events recently is that Hou Xiaoqiang, CEO of Shanda Literature, challenged Baidu on the Internet. From October 27th to November 2nd, Hou Xiaoqiang issued several Weibo articles, accusing Baidu Company of being responsible for piracy and the decline of domestic cultural and creative industries, and calling on publishing colleagues to jointly sue.

the battle caused by Sohu VS Tencent input method

Zhang Chaoyang, chairman of Sohu's board of directors, also stood up for 36 at the first time. On October 1st, Zhang Chaoyang wrote in his Weibo, "In the Internet jungle of China where there is no effective judicial restraint, we need a kind of checks and balances like those existing in nature to limit the evil behavior of monopoly companies to a certain tolerable range. 36' s detection of Tencent is such a kind of check and balance, which makes Tencent know that it can't do whatever it wants. "

Zhang Chaoyang made such a clear-cut statement because Tencent and Sohu have fierce competition in portals, online games and input methods.

In June this year, the "First Case of China Input Method Software" in which Sohu and Tencent sued each other for unfair competition came to an end temporarily. Tencent v Sohu for unfair competition dispute, Sohu lost the case and awarded 24, yuan; Sohu sued Tencent for unfair competition, and Tencent lost the case and paid compensation of 231,5 yuan.

The feud between the two parties about input method started in 29. Sogou said that when Tencent promoted the "QQ Pinyin Input Method", it maliciously induced users to delete sogou Pinyin, which constituted unfair competition. The verdict was "5 boards each", and Zhang Chaoyang couldn't help shouting twice: "A company that is good at plagiarism copied this innovation intact, but now it is suing sogou. What a face! The thief shouted to catch the thief!" "In the United States, the lightest compensation for plagiarism with such an obvious scale should be more than several hundred million dollars. Therefore, it is a delusion to produce Silicon Valley in China! "

other VS TX companies, such as Kugou, Window of the World, Master Lu, Xunlei, Fast Broadcasting, Storm Video, Duowan, UCWEB and Renren, also joined Tencent's opposition camp automatically. They were either invested by Zhou Hongyi or were "surprised to find their own company's path and were very angry" in the "super blacklist" published by 36. Without exception, they have confronted Tencent in the fields of players, games, communities and mobile Internet.