Which is better for civil servants to enter the procuratorate or the court?

Both the court and the procuratorate occupy an important position in China's judicial system, and they are both good choices, and both of them can get good grades. According to the department situation and social status, the court can give priority. The treatment and welfare of civil servants are directly related to the law enforcement power and scope of the department. Therefore, under the same conditions, priority should be given to departments with large power and scope.

Both the court and the procuratorate belong to the judicial department of our country. However, in recent years, judicial reform in China is also in full swing. After the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the system reform of supervisory committee was carried out from top to bottom. It is within the scope of administrative power to include the anti-corruption bureau and the anti-blasphemy bureau, which originally belonged to the procuratorate, in the supervisory Committee. The functions and powers of the procuratorate have been relatively reduced, that is, the related work has also been reduced accordingly. Naturally, the corresponding status of the procuratorate will be reduced accordingly, which is normal.

Extended data:

1, classified management of prosecutors. From 2065438 to March 2007, the State Procuratorial General Administration formulated the Guiding Opinions on Establishing and Perfecting the Order of Procurators' Posts, which guided local procuratorial organs to classify and standardize prosecutors' posts. In May this year, China, the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security jointly issued a reform plan for the appointment system of court clerks, and tried out the appointment system of provincial court clerks.

2. personnel system reform. The prosecutor's office assists the political department and other departments in adhering to the principles of "allocating places according to cases" and "allocating places according to functions" and strictly observing the salary standards and conditions of prosecutors. * * * 228 prosecutors were selected for the first positions in the Supreme People's Procuratorate.

3. Promote the accountability system for prosecutors handling cases. The supporting documents such as "Guiding Opinions on Perfecting the List of Procuratorial Powers" were formulated, and a seminar on the judicial treatment and performance appraisal mechanism of prosecutors was jointly held with Erdos Institute of Theory in Inner Mongolia. It is emphasized that the prosecutor's dominant position in handling judicial cases should be unified with the unified leadership of the prosecutor in the work of the procuratorate, the power of the prosecutor should be clarified, and supervision and restriction should be strengthened.

Improve the case-handling appraisal mechanism based on random distribution and supplemented by designated case distribution. Establish a system in which leading cadres take the lead in handling major, complicated and difficult new cases. Establish a joint meeting system of prosecutors to provide professional reference and suggestions. Establish a disciplinary system for prosecutors, improve the judicial responsibility system, and let prosecutors be responsible for the quality of handling cases for life within the scope of their duties. Fourth, promote the establishment of a professional security system for prosecutors.

Cooperate with relevant departments in the Supreme People's Procuratorate to promote the establishment and implementation of the occupational security system in line with the prosecutor's work order, and establish performance appraisal methods directly related to the number and quality of cases. Promulgate and implement the Provisions on Leading Cadres Intervening in Judicial Activities, Handling Records, Reports and Accountability of Specific Cases, and establish a mechanism for job security and dismissal of prosecutors.