Do you think it is reasonable to recruit employees with graduate education and bachelor's degree?

In many cases, the difference in ability cannot be leveled according to diligence, especially in some jobs with very high difficulty coefficient. The significance that an excellent person can create is likely to be dozens or even hundreds of times that of ordinary employees, which is why many very serious managers only use first-class talents. Which is easier to cultivate first-class talents, a high diploma or a low diploma? I firmly believe that everyone has an answer. Individualism can hardly play its great role at present. It is indispensable to get full training according to the sincere unity of a group of excellent people. If you don't understand this, you can see how many excellent decision-making layers Ma has used to better prepare digital speeches in advance, and how to make this decision-making layer give full play to its use value.

Naturally, these three points are relatively high. It is possible, but I'm not sure. But for grandpa four, who pursues perfect results and welfare, it is obvious that people with high diplomas are more efficient and new to the workplace. It doesn't mean that they can be promoted step by step with strong ability and smooth sailing. There are many ways. Want to know a lot about the facts of entering the workplace, warmly welcome Nan Ge who is concerned about entering the workplace, or ask me questions. I firmly believe that my answer will be helpful to you. I also hope to help a large number of people succeed in the workplace! If it is an administrative institution, the state has a corresponding management system, and there are significant provisions for recruiting talents with candidates. If such a requirement is set, it is probably inappropriate or unscientific.

China's relevant regulations generally require a bachelor's degree or above, and the bachelor's degree does not stipulate one or two, nor does it stipulate the master's index value. The situation of every enterprise is different, although some standards are written on it and some standards are written on the back. This is the inside story. Because there are many people who can choose and can't meet their standards, they will be replaced on the grounds of survival of the fittest. The employer clearly put forward such a regulation. If it is a company, there is no problem. If it is an administrative institution, if you explicitly put forward such a regulation, it is very likely that you can report it to the relevant institutions, or report it to them because the current policy is suspected of discrimination. However, there is generally no conclusion. After all, the selection and appointment is mainly based on random selection.

I don't admit that a small number of students in the bottom colleges are diligent and excellent, but I want to tell you that the proportion of such excellent college students in the bottom colleges is very small! The struggle of this group of relatively small people will not ask these questions, because they have long understood this truth, and the development of this society depends on themselves! You didn't work hard in the first few decades, but you also want to enjoy the fruits of resource struggle with your struggle. If so, people will be out. Social development can only be developed through mutual cooperation and comparison, and there is no need to stick to the rules and give up on ourselves. If you can solve these programming problems, you will have a job interview. The natural problems are really difficult, but the institutions are not limited. Diligence can come in. If you tell me that there are very few people in the lower institutions, then I want to tell you that this is not unreasonable! Instead, it is practical! Few people are willing to spend more than half a year or even more time brushing programming problems in the lower institutions.