Which is better, foreign enterprises, state-owned enterprises or private enterprises?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of state-owned enterprises, private enterprises and foreign enterprises?

Prefer monopoly state-owned enterprises and military enterprises, such as tobacco, electricity, oil, it is difficult to enter! Followed by large foreign companies in Europe and America, such as Microsoft, the treatment is good, formal, but unstable! Thirdly, general state-owned enterprises, research institutes and well-known domestic private enterprises, such as bat and Huawei. If you have a strong relationship with general state-owned enterprises, go to state-owned enterprises, or go to well-known private enterprises as a springboard, and then go to small private enterprises! This kind of private enterprise is well paid, but the work pressure is too great, and generally it won't last long! Then there are local private enterprises with certain strength, generally not very strong listed enterprises, Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese foreign companies. These enterprises are generally treated, but the good and the bad are mixed, and the good and the bad are mixed! Finally, there are small enterprises such as leather bag companies, so I don't explain them. Young people are likely to spend the rest of their lives here tragically!

What's it like to work in private enterprises, foreign enterprises and state-owned enterprises after ten years?

Only officials of state-owned enterprises can sleep in soft sleeper by plane, private enterprises can sleep in soft sleeper by plane as long as the boss agrees, and everyone in foreign enterprises can sleep in soft sleeper by plane. Officials of state-owned enterprises can be divided into big houses, ordinary people into small houses, and young people have no houses. Private enterprises and foreign companies don't have houses, but the leadership and some backbones of Chutian Laser are divided into houses. State-owned enterprises share fruit and oil on holidays (people who purchase these things will inevitably get kickbacks), while foreign enterprises rarely share them, but they have year-end awards (1-20,000). Second, the intensity of work. The most tiring is private enterprises, and the most relaxed is state-owned enterprises. I have held technical positions (technician, project specialist), secretary to the general manager and management positions in state-owned enterprises (by the way, I majored in mechanical manufacturing). However, working as a technical post in state-owned enterprises is very tiring, with the lowest income, many responsibilities and great pressure. But management positions are easy. Doing technology in private enterprises is the most tiring, uncomfortable and stressful. Working in a foreign company is not as tiring as I thought. Maybe European companies are more humane. It is said that Japanese-funded and Korean-funded foreign enterprises are all labor-intensive. I'm not very clear about it. I just heard about it. The nature of my job requires frequent business trips, with an average annual working time of 250 days. Almost all the rest can take vacations or arrange their own working hours. The difference between foreign companies is that everyone's position is given greater power and freedom. For example, I do after-sales service, and I want to contribute everything related to the equipment on the spot, including acceptance, equipment handling, on-site employment, equipment debugging and so on. When it comes to funding, you can generally make up your own mind and report it. This is different from most state-owned enterprises. It is difficult for state-owned enterprises to deal with funds. In state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, it is usually "a pen". There are 2000 people in my state-owned enterprise, and the boss has to sign a lot of words every day. It's really tiring. Unwilling to decentralize, this may be the biggest difference between foreign companies and private enterprises and state-owned enterprises in management. Third, employee relations. The relationship between employees in state-owned enterprises is the most complicated. I was recruited into the power engineering company, but most people in the power system rely on relationships or internal children, so people who are recruited into the company often do things, but if they have no relationships or are not good at dealing with interpersonal relationships, there is little chance of promotion. State-owned enterprises are too busy to play dead. When they first entered the company, they did almost everything, and workers, technicians and quality inspectors did almost everything. They are very tired. A few years later, you can ask people who come in later to do it and play by themselves, which is called taking an apprentice. But state-owned enterprises have one advantage. No matter how bad you are, no one dares to fire you. Sometimes workers can break the leader's head in order to divide the house. The manager of our state-owned enterprise is broken because of the unfair distribution of housing. The relationship between employees of private enterprises and foreign enterprises is simple and intrigued, but it is not as complicated as that of state-owned enterprises. The employee relationship in foreign companies is better and simpler. Organize employee family trips and parties every year. When encountering difficulties, everyone helps each other, unlike private enterprises, which take care of each other regardless of others. Private and foreign companies don't know how much their colleagues earn a month, at least they don't know the details. Fourth, trade unions and workers' rights and interests. Trade unions in state-owned enterprises have the strongest "strength", including trade union chairmen, office directors, women workers ministers, accounting and entertainment ministers. But they are all owners who only take money and don't do things. They all have connections to get to that position. It is impossible for such a trade union to safeguard workers' interests, and there will never be anything to negotiate with leaders to raise workers' wages. I found it funny to see that the Federation of Trade Unions asked Vuormaa to form a trade union. This is a typical state-owned enterprise thinking. Vuormaa said that we have never opposed the formation of trade unions by workers. If employees ask for it, they will definitely support it. This is the way of thinking of foreigners. In fact, the trade union law also stipulates that trade unions must be organized by workers and by bosses. Can such a trade union speak for workers? Vuormaa is actually not stupid anymore. When foreigners first arrived in China, they were not used to this China way of thinking. Later, the leaders gradually became "China experts" and adapted to China's thinking. They understand that the establishment of trade unions in China is actually to serve enterprises and coordinate the contradictions between enterprises and employees. Most private enterprises have no trade unions. The foreign company where I work has a trade union, but there are no full-time staff. At present, trade union work is limited to going abroad once a year. It is difficult for employees of state-owned enterprises to be fired, because firing an employee has to go through a trade union congress, and even more important leaders of state-owned enterprises are afraid of getting into trouble. Private enterprises fire employees, and it is common for employees to fire private enterprises. Generally, foreign companies in Europe rarely fire employees unless they can't continue to operate or really can't adapt to the work. Our company >>

Young people are most developed in state-owned enterprises, private enterprises and foreign enterprises.

State-owned enterprises and foreign enterprises have their own advantages. The welfare of state-owned enterprises is better than that of foreign enterprises, and party member is even better. The starting salary of state-owned enterprises is not as high as that of foreign enterprises, but it is gradually improved according to individual ability. And with a pension, it is not easy to close down and dismiss employees. Compared with foreign companies, it is a private enterprise factory, and the company is more risky and vulnerable to the market economic crisis. But the diploma it requires is not high. As long as you have outstanding ability, you can go to work. Just came back from a foreign company, the salary can be very high, which is a bit outrageous. For managers, but for ordinary workers below, they only work day and night. Many private enterprises work in two shifts, day shift and night shift. The night shift is very hard, and it is not something that ordinary people can get through. For people with a certain level of knowledge, it is cheap labor. They have no fixed labor laws. You must work twelve hours a day, not eight. State-owned enterprises come in accordance with national laws. In short, state-owned enterprises are more secure and better than foreign enterprises, but it is also more difficult to get into good internal units.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of entering state-owned enterprises, private enterprises and foreign enterprises?

Private enterprises are the worst and not standardized. There are also good ones. The salary is even higher than that of state-owned enterprises or foreign enterprises.

State-owned enterprises, the working environment is still a little relaxed. Note that it does not mean that the work content is also relaxed. Now many state-owned enterprises are also very tired when they go to work. I once described it as the same as fighting. There are fewer relaxed state-owned enterprises, unless they are public institutions or civil servants. However, that is not a state-owned enterprise.

The wages of foreign enterprises are higher than those of state-owned enterprises, and the competition is fierce. In addition, if the economic environment is not good, they may close down or withdraw from the domestic market.

Only from the perspective of state-owned enterprises, foreign enterprises and private enterprises, the classification is too large. There are tens of thousands of enterprises in each category, which are different. See which company you are in.

State-owned enterprises, private enterprises and foreign enterprises, which is better when looking for a job?

1 advantages of state-owned enterprises: stability, good treatment and face. Disadvantages: slow promotion, easy to encounter bottlenecks and difficult to break through.

Advantages of private enterprises: large development space and easy to be recognized. Disadvantages: not stable enough, the treatment is average (not just salary, comprehensive treatment)

Advantages of foreign companies: high salary and perfect enterprise system. Disadvantages: foreign companies update quickly and are easily eliminated.

Which is better, state-owned enterprises, private enterprises or foreign enterprises?

Generally speaking, state-owned enterprises are still quite good.

1. First of all, all state-owned enterprises have been screened. Many people say what state-owned enterprises were like 20 years ago, but at that time, only state-owned enterprises, as long as they moved, would certainly move. After a round of luggage, the country still holds high-quality assets in its hands.

2. The biggest crisis for foreign companies is the middle-aged crisis. Unemployment pressure is everywhere, the performance is not good, the overall environment is not good, the company is acquired, and the whole department is laid off. But for young people, a foreign company that has just entered the workplace, can fight and fight, has a high income and a free environment is very good. Even a business trip is regarded as an opportunity to enjoy great rivers and mountains at public expense.

3, private enterprises, the Internet is a special case, because this line of state-owned enterprises can not play, foreign companies can not get in, other industries look at foreign companies.

Is it better for state-owned enterprises or private enterprises or foreign enterprises after graduation?

Frankly speaking:

Choosing a job depends first on your ability? What is your personal ability (there are two kinds of this ability, before graduation and after graduation)? What kind of development do you want?

I think we can advance into state-owned enterprises, and when it is not suitable, we can choose to change jobs and then choose others;

If you don't choose advanced state-owned enterprises, it may be difficult to wait until the opportunity passes!

The important thing is that you choose, and everyone sits here and chats.

State-owned enterprises, private enterprises and foreign enterprises, which is better?

As far as feeling is concerned, the general management of foreign enterprises is relatively standardized and less involved in the world; If the scale of state-owned enterprises is larger, there is more room for promotion and it can exercise people more; Private enterprises are relatively flexible, but it depends on luck and what kind of boss they meet. Personally, I think it is better to find an enterprise with considerable scale, strict and standardized management and large room for growth. If you are young, you can try a few more and finally find a suitable job. It is recommended to plan your life from a long-term perspective.

Do you think state-owned enterprises are better or private enterprises, and foreign enterprises are better?

The first choice is foreign companies.

Foreign enterprises: the working atmosphere is relaxed and pleasant, with high salary and good treatment.

State-owned enterprises: the system is rigid, the salary is average, everything is rigid and bureaucracy is prevalent.

Private enterprises: Work pressure is high, and dissatisfaction is in danger of being fired, because private enterprises live on performance, and without performance, they have to close down.

After graduation, which is better, private enterprise, state-owned enterprise or foreign enterprise, joint venture?

Have the background to go to state-owned enterprises and have the ability to go to joint ventures.

What kind of boss does the private enterprise meet according to luck?

Pure foreign companies are not optimistic