Why do many colleges and universities only recruit famous teachers?

The first is the gap in their own level.

In fact, the level gap is easy to understand. Most people who apply for colleges and universities will first choose better colleges and universities to apply. If their application fails, they will settle for the second best. Assume that all applicants have applied for 985 colleges and universities, but they have not applied for them, but have applied for ordinary colleges and universities. In other words, teachers in ordinary colleges and universities are disdainful of 985 colleges and universities, or choose the rest. In fact, most college applicants simply don't have the guts to vote for 985 colleges and universities. After all, people are expensive and know themselves. In addition, many teachers who can't stay in 985 colleges and universities can still hire professors or associate professors in ordinary colleges and universities, which shows the overall gap of their teaching staff.

The gap of teachers' level is not in teaching, but in scientific research, but the scientific research is largely reflected in teaching. A good research teacher may not speak well on the platform, but he can take students into the laboratory and let them do it by themselves, which is better than speaking a hundred sentences on the platform.

The second is the gap between development platforms.

985 colleges and universities are difficult to enter and stay, but there are still many people who want to squeeze in because these schools have better development platforms. The development platform includes advanced experimental instruments, high-level academic team and good academic reputation. In other words, it is easier to make a higher level of scientific research results, and it is also easier to be recognized by peers. Academic circles are also snobbish, and the achievements of famous schools and teachers will be highly valued. For example, young teachers in 985 may apply successfully when they enter school, but it is good for ordinary college teachers to apply for one for life. As for all kinds of talent titles, they are the accumulation of previous achievements. If you can't even apply for the Youth Fund of the Natural Fund, what else can you use to evaluate talents?

The third is the income gap.

Colleges and universities are second-class public welfare organizations. Except for a few state grants, most of them earn money by themselves, and the main way to make money is scientific research. Teachers in 985 colleges and universities have a high level of scientific research and many scientific research projects, so the school is rich. The annual financial statements of universities such as Zhejiang University in the north of Qing Dynasty have exceeded 654.38+00 billion, while most ordinary undergraduate universities may be several hundred million. This money will be reflected in the income of faculty and staff in various forms. For example, the commission for teachers' services, some schools are 40% of the project funds, and teachers can raise 400,000 for projects with 1 10,000. Therefore, while non-university teachers are still trying to earn class time, teachers in 985 universities may have achieved financial freedom.

Of course, what we are talking about here is the overall level, and the specific income is also divided. Double-non-colleges and universities also explore pockets, take things and other projects, and 985 colleges and universities also have a hard time.