Are there any thorny problems in the process of correcting the papers in public institutions?

1. There is nothing fishy about the written test. There are a lot of people marking papers, and people taking exams in institutions are also on the W, so it is impossible for people with connections to say hello. If the relationship is very hard, institutions can enter without trial. After all, the recruitment of public institutions is not as mature as that of civil servants.

The interview is unlikely to be tricky, but it still is. After all, the interview of public institutions is conducted in this unit or the administrative civil service organ of this unit. Although it was transferred by interviewers from several departments, it is still possible to find a unit to say hello. There are only 1 and 2 people in the interview personnel department, and the supervision is not as strict as that of civil servants.

After all, you need a written test, and the interviewer can find a relationship, so in general, you need to take an examination of public institutions.

Personally, I think it's fair,

I took the exam twice, 1 second, 1 third. I went to the interview 1 time and thought it was fair. Grading, then leaving the examination room and so on, the system is very strict.

The institutions in the city are certainly not as strict as those in the province.

It is still recommended to apply for a position with a small number of applicants. Otherwise, the institution will be difficult to test. It is normal for more than 20 masters to squeeze 1 position.