Do you think private schools should be abolished? Why?

My father is an educator, mainly responsible for popularizing compulsory education. When I was a child, he and his colleagues traveled all over the cities, counties and townships of my hometown province.

Their task is to set the goal of nine-year compulsory education, understand the needs of the local government, allocate funds, check and accept them, and persuade local people to send their children to school for education.

My father clearly told me the names and locations of all the primary and secondary schools in my hometown, because they are running around day and night.

I ran with him once when I was a child. At that time, the conditions were not good, and I vomited on an old Volga car.

During all holidays, my father was on a business trip. In my childhood memory, he spent little time with me, but he devoted himself to the leaders, principals, teachers and students of those schools and villages.

I still remember that one year during the Spring Festival, my father worked overtime for a holiday. On the last day, he just lay down after reading the document. As a result, he received a phone call. The local leader said that two children were trampled to death when a school was doing exercises between classes before the holiday because the stairs in the teaching building were narrow. The local authorities tried to hide it, but it turned out to be no small matter. As the head of the superior supervision department, he set out overnight and braved the cold.

At present, nine-year compulsory education is popular in China, that is, children receive free education before junior high school, which is a national system. This is also the work that my father devoted his life to. He told me that after the life of their generation is exhausted, the successors will continue to work hard and we will popularize high school universities in the future. The richer a country is, the more it invests in education, so it should invest more in treating the next generation and education, so that the quality of citizens is higher and society is better.

My childhood was spent in the memory that my father didn't have time to educate me, but went to work for the education of other children.

I have received public education since I was a child. However, it can be said that I am miserable. I have been studying in a key high school, and there is no way to get into a good university in China.

In my memory of elementary school, junior high school and senior high school, the first-class public schools in these countries are responsible for a few teachers, but the better the school, the more teachers who ring the bell in class and then open various classes to earn extra money.

What does this mean? Pot rice is delicious, but the country is big, there are many people and the cost is high. Everyone doesn't eat much. If you don't have enough to eat, you must find your own way. There are policies on the top and countermeasures on the bottom.

Later, I went abroad, not a developed country in Britain and America, but a relatively poor country. I find that education abroad is not the same. Also abroad, I read a little doctor. After graduation, I returned to China and worked in a private university for some time. As far as my personal experience is concerned, I find that my salary is one third higher than that of public universities.

For this question, first of all, someone will stand up and confidently say-

Private schools are a paradise for the rich, with high prices, so that the rich can study and receive better education. So this is anti-collective and anti-social. Our country should support the public sector, so that everyone can study and all classes can receive education. Therefore, private education is capitalist rubbish and anti-social and should be banned.

People with this idea simply can't tell what is public and what is private.

This is not difficult to understand. The state pays for repairing schools, paying teachers and subsidizing tuition fees for students, so that more people in society can afford to go to school and popularize compulsory education. Public ownership is certainly good from the starting point, but in practice, the richer the country is, the easier it is to operate, and the less affluent the country is, the ideal is full and it is inevitable that the reality is very skinny.

However, being private does not mean that private bosses pay for making money. There are great differences in the understanding of private ownership between East and West.

20 18 international QS ranking-

Among them, the top five are MIT, Stanford, Harvard, Caltech, Cambridge and Oxford.

Strictly speaking, it's all personal.

Maybe someone will stand up and say, alas, Oxford and Cambridge are government-funded research schools and belong to the public.

Yes, government expenditure does not mean that the government spends money to cover everything, and the government decides everything.

Oxford University consists of 38 independent colleges and 4 colleges. Each college is an independent administrative institution, which is subordinate to the university. They have their own management framework, enrollment and student activities; The college is responsible for arranging teaching staff to give lectures and guide research projects, and for compiling courses and providing academic guidance. Universities accept commercial subsidies and have their own publishing houses for commercial activities.

The best universities in western countries are generally private. Private universities can give universities more space for independent development, market-oriented operation, better treatment for teachers and naturally higher level of teaching and scientific research. However, private ownership does not mean that the boss is holding shares and making money from this school. Most of them are sponsored by churches and foundations and donated by individuals. Donation is public welfare, not profit.

Public educational institutions in China mean that everyone asks the state to pay for education, and master's degree is not profitable. However, in fact, everyone can only get a limited portion of porridge. The development of education is slow, especially in the frontier field. In the social environment of China, some people even use public funds, and various relationships are complicated.

Private educational institutions in the west have the nature of real social welfare organizations, because even though many rich people and consortia donate money to universities and scientific research institutions to avoid taxes, they donate money not to make money, but to change their names. This is good for their enterprises and good for society.

Equalization is impossible in many places, especially in China, where the population quality is relatively low. With the efforts of the country and a large number of lazy poor people who eat the same pot, it is difficult to make progress. Noisy to be average, more unwilling to contribute, and want to enjoy better welfare. The so-called citizen means that responsibilities and obligations should be equal, and you can pay as much as you want.

Public and private enterprises should be encouraged to develop together, and state funds should be used to subsidize those universities that deserve subsidies. In cutting-edge areas, efforts should be used in cutting-edge areas. In the market-oriented operation, if the boss has money, he will pay for his own private operation. If he does well, he should make money. If a student has good conditions at home and wants to receive a better education, he will pay a high price to go to a private interchange. For those big capitalists, instead of letting them invest their money in the entertainment industry, it is better to let them avoid taxes and donate education. No one should kidnap social morality. Economic law is the most objective law.

I sincerely hope that there will be more American Ivy League schools in China, so that more people in need of education can receive better education and the quality of national citizens can really become better.

I work in Wenjiang, Chengdu. There are many private schools here, but few public schools in Wenjiang. But there are many properties, and the occupancy rate is extremely high, because Chengdu has a large population!

The nearest Guanghua experimental primary school, as far as I know, is now in Class 1 14, with 60 students in each class. The canteen of the school library is used as a classroom. Not to mention public kindergartens, Guanghua Kindergarten only recruits dozens of people, and there are no other public kindergartens nearby. If you want to go in, you must sign up in the womb.

Are all the people who go to private schools rich? Not really, but I can't help it, there is no place to learn!

If public schools can meet the needs of all children, who is willing to spend the money? There are more and more buildings in the city, but the infrastructure can't keep up, especially the educational facilities. Children really have nowhere to go to school.

For migrant workers like us, sometimes we are very grateful to these private schools. At least you can pay them, but we don't have to look at the time when public schools and locals can't guarantee it.

At least the present situation of Wenjiang cannot be cancelled, and it is getting better and better! On my way home from work recently, I saw two private kindergartens recruiting teachers. The renovation has been completed, and the estimated cost is more than 20 thousand.

This is the most unkind question I have ever seen. Private schools have been hated since their birth. Why?

The salary of private schools is generally 2-3 times that of public schools. Just like when I transferred from a public middle school to a private middle school, my peers looked at me a little differently: I am also a teacher. Just because I went to a private school, why is my salary so high?

Not to mention peers, even the leaders of the education authorities are very dissatisfied. Especially when cars are not popular and teachers in private schools can buy cars first, teachers in private schools make some people uncomfortable, so the voice of criticizing private schools is getting louder and louder.

Because of its unique system, private schools have mobilized teachers' enthusiasm to the greatest extent, so their educational and teaching achievements are generally higher than those of public middle schools.

Public schools are facing unprecedented challenges and feel great pressure, so they are full of envy and jealousy for private schools. In particular, the recent shrinking of students has given them a sense of crisis, so they are more eager to ban private secondary schools.

The appearance of private schools, like a catfish, stirred up the rigid education. Private schools should not be abolished, but should be strongly advocated and encouraged, because they improve the quality of education and teaching as a whole and let ordinary people enjoy high-quality educational resources at a lower price.

Who is bad for private schools? In their view, the side of the sofa can't let others sleep soundly. Private middle schools have moved their cheese, and they can't be as leisurely as before!

I read several reviews! Everyone is in favor of private schools, and everyone has mentioned what I want to say! I won't repeat it. I think private kindergartens are better than public kindergartens. The outstanding problem is high fees, but don't spend them privately. You don't know how much money to send! Because Sun went to a public elementary school, the teacher openly asked for a "tip". In the first semester of senior one, my son gave the teacher 1000 yuan, which basically made do for a semester! In the second semester, because my son was busy, he sent a "tip" a few days late. Wang Lin, the Chinese teacher of the class teacher, refused to let his grandson go to school. My son is helpless! I had to ask for leave to take my grandson to the dean. The dean immediately arranged for my grandson to attend classes in the classroom, but Teacher Wang Lin launched a class cadre siege to provoke my grandson! The son had no choice but to go directly to the school principal. Teacher Wang Lin said that his grandson made trouble after class and fought with his classmates! The son asked for monitoring and verification! The school refused to monitor! But the headmaster assured my son that it would never happen again! You can work with peace of mind. Students who are dissatisfied with every gift because of the poor quality of Teacher Wang Lin! ) have bullied students more or less, and one-third of parents have looked for the principal. The headmaster gave Wang a warning! Therefore, I didn't send this 1000 yuan to Wang Lin in the second semester, so I managed to survive the second semester of senior one!

Although the grandson is still studying in this public primary school in the second grade, Teacher Wang Lin has been transferred! However, my son and daughter-in-law have been looking for a good private school and are ready to transfer their grandchildren to private schools. …………

High school private schools must be cancelled! When conditions are ripe, private junior high schools will be cancelled!

The city's final exam for the senior high school entrance examination, private schools "won" again! It is not surprising to win, because the teachers in the same field have become accustomed to it, but what about public opinion?

This school is a private school with only about 100 students, beating the city's 57487 students. This is definitely the most famous "battle" in history, enough to go down in history.

Every time there is a unified examination in the whole city, students and parents will always get the test results ahead of the teachers and get the results ranked in the whole city! Then it will spread wildly among various parents.

Then the problem comes: students' grades belong to students' privacy, and the education bureau has repeatedly refused to allow teachers to pass on students' grades in the group. How did this detailed report card of tens of thousands of people in the city come out? For what purpose? Who is the beneficiary?

In fact, the answer is clear at a glance. Just look at the top ten of this report card, and you will know fairly well: among the top 10 in the city, a private "experimental" high school accounts for 7.

Some people say that "this school is too awesome"; Some people say that "teachers in this school use student accounts to do questions"; Some people say that "the teachers in this school will reveal the answer in advance". We don't know what it is.

However, as teachers, we should all understand that it is really normal for a school to occupy 7 seats in the top 10 in the unified examination of nearly 60,000 people in the city. Even if the best teachers and students in the city are concentrated in two classes, can this result really be guaranteed? Besides, teachers and students are not the best! The problem is that as long as it is a city-wide unified examination, this school will have such a brilliant "record", whether it is a senior one, a senior two or a senior three. Why? A rational person should know it.

This kind of publicity is too important for private schools, because what they need most is "advertising", and the results of the municipal unified examination are the best "advertising words". Through this kind of publicity, two purposes have been achieved:

First, put pressure on public schools! This goal has indeed been achieved, and the effect is very good! Just look at the panic behavior of parents in public schools.

Second, the impact on Tsinghua "Xu Li" of Peking University. Private schools will have a bright future if they are admitted to several Peking University Tsinghua every year. However, does such a school really have this strength? Absolutely not! So is there a shortcut? Of course, that is "self-enrollment". What is the most important thing for Peking University Tsinghua to enroll students independently? The fifth (fourth) major subject competition, this private school can't work, and then spend money to find other ways to "package". In addition to packaging, there is also a very important thing, that is, the ranking of cities in previous major exams. This is quite convincing. For universities, they don't know the process, only look at the results, so they will make such schools profit from it.

This is just the "tip of the iceberg" of "private schools" running schools in violation of regulations! Illegal enrollment, buying students at high prices, making up lessons during holidays, and not offering enough courses according to regulations have seriously disrupted the "educational ecology" of a region.

The same is true of primary school and junior high school!

A local real estate developer established a "high standard" international school to develop a house. At that time, he promised that as long as he bought a house, it would be a "school district room" and he would go to a famous school for free at home. As a result, developers forgot one thing, that is, people who buy houses are not only one child, but many people have two or more children, and the degree is seriously insufficient. Parents made a scene in the principal's office, and the final result was a class in the principal's office. How effective the education is, you can imagine!

Every time I talk about the disadvantages of "private schools", there will always be people who take the United States as an example and say that good schools in the United States are private schools! This is no problem, but don't forget, that's America, not China! In China, it should be analyzed according to the situation in China. How many private schools are there that are not for profit? To make money? For financing? I have seen all these, but I have never seen a private school that is really for students and public welfare! When did private schools lose their selfishness? At that time, they really studied for public welfare, for the country and for the people. what do you think?

? Compulsory education must resolutely ban private schools, because interests impact education, making a generation of education destroyed by private schools Private schools have become the cancer of compulsory education. Private education charges high tuition fees, bosses make money for education, pinch teachers and students, and impact public education, making public education unsustainable and destroying a generation of teenagers. Private education can't carry out the party's educational policy, and it is a partial student. You shouldn't go to public universities, you can only go to private universities. Private schools can't beat it, mainly driven by interests and represented by interest groups. If the rich who really invest in education should be charitable, the tuition fees of students with financial difficulties should not be higher than those of public schools, and the salaries of teachers should not be higher than those of public schools, otherwise it will be banned. Private schools cannot fully implement the party's educational policy and cultivate talents. Public colleges and universities are not allowed to accept students from private schools, forming two series, namely, public middle schools take the state-owned university test and private middle schools take the private universities test, so as to rectify the educational chaos, set things right and ensure the healthy development of education in China.

For private schools, our teachers couldn't understand it at first. Why run private schools when there are public schools? Slowly found that things are not as simple as we thought. Private schools have their inevitability and necessity, and there are various forms of existence.

First of all, in developed cities such as Beishangguangshen and Shenzhen, in order to meet the high demand of some wealthy families for education, some aristocratic private schools came into being. These schools are mostly in the name of international schools and foreign language schools. That sounds so high. Natural fees are also expensive, hundreds of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of fees per semester. Of course, ordinary families are not encouraged. High fees are exchanged for high-standard education and services, personalized education, exchanges and interactions with famous foreign schools, and the cultivation of children's interests, which ordinary public schools can't do because there is no funding for this. Some wealthy businessmen and stars are eager for this aristocratic private school, and it is often hard to find one.

Secondly, there are some "private schools", which are affiliated with prestigious schools and are branded as "experimental schools". Why is this "private school" in quotation marks? Because their roots are still in public schools! There are some famous schools, and students from all over the world come in an endless stream. However, in the compulsory education stage, it is impossible to recruit students across regions and charge high fees. It is a bit reckless to see that high-quality students can't get in and that parents who want to squeeze in with money can't accept it. Thus, the "experimental school" was born, and it was still a familiar place and a familiar teacher. However, as a brand changes, it becomes "private". Since it is private, cross-regional enrollment is no problem, and it is also possible to recruit high-quality students. Cost 12 1 year, without negotiation. This kind of private school has broken the framework of public school enrollment, and it is also considered that some parents outside the school district have spent money to round the dream of a famous school!

There is also a private school, and life is very miserable. No prestigious school background, no educational resources of noble schools. This is a truly private school. Most of them are under the signboard of "Wenwu School" and "International School", with independent enrollment and closed management. Students are mainly children whose parents have gone out for many years and stayed alone. Their parents have no time to take care of them, so they can only send them to such full-time schools. Most of these schools have poor teaching quality.

The existence is reasonable. Private schools will at least exist for a long time, and will be a supplement to public schools, providing more personalized education services for some families with special educational needs!

In my opinion, to look at this problem objectively, we must first put aside our identity and stand from the perspective of a third party in order to make an objective evaluation.

I am neither a private school teacher nor a public school teacher, but a third party. My view is only from the perspective of parents-demanders.

First of all, the emergence of private schools is the product of social development and market economy. Although a private school can only be established with the approval of government departments, it is not a public institution, but an enterprise, subject to inspection and supervision by the administrative department for industry and commerce. For example, the reorganization of education and training institutions a while ago was mainly carried out by the industrial and commercial departments. What does this mean? Explanation is the product of marketization, and it can't be cancelled by administrative order. It is obviously inappropriate to use the word "cancel". It doesn't mean that if you don't like it, you have to shout, fight or kill easily, and you can achieve it by coercive means.

Secondly, "God's belongs to God and Caesar's belongs to Caesar." This sentence means that in an orderly society ruled by law, people should live in peace, stick to what they should do well, take their places and try their best to ensure social balance and stability. Private schools appear as a supplement to public education, and the two should complement each other. Before the emergence of private education, the lack of public education could not meet the needs of society.

Third, the public education system lags behind social development. This is reflected in the following points: first, public schools lack incentive and competition mechanisms, and the level is the same. Doing more and doing less seriously dampened the enthusiasm of high-level teachers. Eating the same pot and fishing in troubled waters are everywhere. Second, teachers are no longer the social elite with profound academic background in the Republic of China and the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China. Their level, feelings and morality are unquestionable authorities that no one can identify. I believe that there are respected teachers in the current teaching staff, but as far as the overall level is concerned, it lags far behind the expectations of society.

Thirdly, the behavior of some public teachers deviates from the essence of education and discredits the group image. Some teachers, "two-footed", are mercenary. They not only enjoy the convenience brought by their positions within the system, but also take advantage of this convenience to set up private remedial classes and make up lessons with compensation, which seriously affects the group image of teachers.

Finally, private education institutions have flexible mechanisms and effective incentives, so they have trained a group of high-level teachers on the Internet to meet the needs of students and parents. As a parent, I have personally experienced the lectures of institutions. My advantages are as follows: First, the classroom is interactive and effective, which is very popular with students. On the other hand, the classroom effect in public schools is mostly not so good. Second, the performance has improved significantly. We can't deny that the goal of many parents and students is to enter key middle schools and universities, and the primary conditions for entering key schools are "scores" and grades. Without "points", everything is impossible.

Some public school teachers don't believe it. On the one hand, they envy other people's high salaries, on the other hand, they are unwilling to give up comfortable and stable jobs within the system. The world is "you can't have your cake and eat it". Behind the high salary of private schools are people's efforts, high-intensity work and the mechanism of rewarding the excellent and punishing the poor. How many teachers in public schools can adapt?

Again, "God's belongs to God, and Caesar's belongs to Caesar." Competition needs to be introduced in the field of education, and a stagnant pool needs the stimulation of private education. Existence is reasonable, and it is futile to try to cancel a market product by coercive means.

I sent such a question and was banned.

Thank you for asking such a serious question for our generation. How serious is this problem? As front-line teachers, we have found a huge problem. Unfortunately, no one listened.

You can say that! If private schools are not abolished, the educational contradiction will be 10000 times greater than the current contradiction.

At present, public schools adopt district admission, and the redundant places are "selected". In any case, the basic quota is guaranteed. However, private schools are not divided into districts, only merit-based admission and top-notch admission. And this is a face-saving admission method. Basically, for some special groups, special admission is also taken.

Take our city as an example. The best junior high schools in our city are all private schools. They took away 90% high-quality students from primary schools. Access to public schools, no matter how hard you try, can not be surpassed. After all, poor students must receive compulsory education.

This is not the worst. At present, private schools in our city have extended their tentacles to high schools in an attempt to compete with No.1 Middle School for high school students. Because high school education is not compulsory, high school can still persist now.

At present, this situation is only an unfair phenomenon of educational resources. What about the future?

Just look at foreign language kindergartens and 12 compulsory schools. Many special parents send their children to such selective schools. Children are surrounded by similar people, so they will not take the college entrance examination and go abroad to study directly. After graduation, these children also went out to play together and established an alumni network.

Although this situation appears at present, it is not significant. Will private schools develop for another ten years, and families with special parents will always be special families? Ordinary families are always the phenomenon of ordinary families.

Finally, give the example of the United States. Anyone in the United States can go to Harvard, but the children of senators, representatives, judges and governors all study in the same private high school. A civilian governor, the second generation has the opportunity to enter the political core circle. West Point Military Academy needs the recommendation of members to go to school.

I suggest banning private schools in China.

What is the purpose of running a school by the state? What is the purpose of running a private school? As long as we think about this problem fundamentally, we will know whether private schools should be banned! For a country, education is a major event. In the past, it was a question of training people for whom. Why did Japan and Taiwan Province Province change their textbooks? I want to transform a generation ideologically, educate a generation and train the generation they need. If a private school, especially a private school in the basic education stage, stands up and says: The purpose of running a school is to train workers and successors needed for the construction of the motherland, do you believe it? We don't deny that private schools have indeed trained many outstanding talents, but these outstanding talents are talents no matter where they are trained, because: gold always shines! I am still the same sentence: the education of copper smell is not real education! On the other hand, all kinds of chaos in the medical industry are the consequences of private hospitals, aren't they?