What is the significance of the rule that recruitment should not restrict men or men's priority?

The significance of this provision lies in making men and women equal and avoiding discrimination against women when applying for jobs. It is not a day or two since women are discriminated against in job hunting. This is mainly because a large number of women need to face problems such as marriage, childbirth and maternity leave. Recruiting companies don't want to ask for trouble, and naturally they will set conditions to limit men or men's priority.

The main purpose of stipulating that recruitment should not be limited to men or male priority is to avoid discrimination against women in job hunting. It seems that equality between men and women can be achieved, but I think this provision will not be very useful in practice, but will waste women's time even more. For example, Ms. Zhang, 23, is unmarried. When she was looking for a job, because she didn't see the words "male priority" or "male limited", she complained about a lot of resumes, but they all fell into the sea. Although I applied for it countless times, I didn't get an answer every time.

There is a simple reason. Although companies openly do not restrict male preference, they prefer male candidates in private, so let's think about it in reverse. What benefits can this rule really bring to women? Those positions that are originally suitable for women will still recruit women, but Hr will focus on those married women. Those jobs that are suitable for men are not suitable for women, although there is no stipulation that men are preferred or restricted. Naturally, not many women are willing to apply.

Although this rule can help women on the surface, it doesn't work in practice. Because this rule can control the equality between men and women in enterprises, but it can't control the choice of hr, they may refuse those who will take it? Trouble? For example, some unmarried women are not suitable for this position because of their poor ability, or because of their low academic qualifications. These problems are uncontrollable. In order to really improve the status of women, it is not enough to have this provision.