What happened to those who applied in You Are Me? Is it reliable to get a job on TV?

I attended it the year I graduated. You are the only one. Come and tell me once.

At that time, I didn't want to find a job. I just want to see how my five years in college (bad rest, junior college upgraded to undergraduate course) are going.

Fortunately, there is no shame. Teacher Zhang Shaogang left two lamps and chose you as the "nail house", but actually she didn't go later.

It is said that as far as we know, a large part of the people who decided which house to go to on TV basically didn't go. Of course, there are many reasons, but money is still the biggest problem. Because after stepping down, some big bosses B will not directly give the candidates the same salary as they said on the stage.

It's been five years since I graduated, and now my younger brother and younger sister say that my video was put by the teacher. I don't know how many schoolmates saw it, whether actively or passively, everyone endured me.

I admire myself for not hesitating in the past. I will show off to my children with videos in the future. Your father was on TV. Ha ha.

Netizen 1: I feel that this job search program is like a "draft"-the whole program is a show.

Every job seeker shows himself on the stage, and every boss above him is also "acting" himself-on and off the stage, seven points are true and three points are hypocritical.

The whole program is a show, just watch it.

As for job seekers and employers, how to sign the contract after the program is another matter.

Some job seekers become attached to the employer through programs, sign satisfactory contracts, and get the remuneration promised by the boss; Some job seekers, although they found the "employer" in the program, had differences when signing the contract, and finally the two sides broke up in discord.

However, most job seekers still found their ideal jobs in the program.

This kind of job-hunting program is still a relatively broad platform. As long as you have the ability and strength to show yourself on the stage, participating in this TV job-hunting program will still be of great help to your career and life development.

Netizen 2: The former company participated in one of the programs. At that time, many technical colleagues thought that participating in such programs would damage the professional image of the company.

None of the project recruiters came to the company, at least not to our office.

At that time, the manager of HR department participated in the program, but in our company, HR is only a recruitment service department and has no right to recruit independently unless it is recruited by its own department.

As a professional technology company, no team wants the so-called "elite" recruited in variety shows. Real technical elites disdain to hype themselves.

This kind of program is similar to if you are the one, just have fun.

Netizen 3: I used to work in the west campus of Communication University, just across the street from the studio of You Are Me. The family and shareholders of the company are star bosses, so I have also established some bosses. Generally speaking, bosses have their own charms.

As for the job seekers in "You Are Me", nearly half of the employees in the former employer's company came from the on-site recruitment of "You Are Me". To tell the truth, no matter Xiao Bai or an old bird in the workplace, most of his abilities and comprehensive qualities are still ok.

However, there may be some job changes after going to the company (after all, you are the only one who can't make a comprehensive evaluation after just a few minutes of on-site interview, which is generally more accurate), and there will be an appropriate and flexible adjustment after entering the company. However, the overall development is in line with reality, which is still good.

Everything is relative. Accurately speaking, it is just a platform, which bears the multi-dimensional needs of enterprise communication, TV media and job seekers. Some people find a sense of ceremony, some find a sense of accomplishment, some find a sense of honor, and some find a sense of belonging.

The boss group, the host and the candidates on the spot are not perfect and cannot be solidified because of one or some behavioral phenomena.

So there is no absolute, no good or bad, the key is from what angle to objectively evaluate.

Netizen 4: "None but you" and "Job-hopping" are all good variety shows. It's not easy for this company to advertise itself on TV channels and recruit talents for itself.

The company has excellent conditions and provides a good platform for job seekers.

And job seekers can stand in the middle of the crane. Just look at his own skills and see if he can handle it.

I have a friend who has the courage to take part in It's You. After several wars of words, he got an Offer from a company he liked very much, and several bosses vied for him.

After the program, he did go to the post, and the post salary was actually a little worse than what he said on the stage, because the personnel said that the boss on the stage said the salary after you became a full member. You need to practice for three months first. If you become a regular employee after three months, it must be that salary.

Finally, my friend only worked for a month and left. The reason is that the company is not as good as expected, and it still feels that there is no big development.

Therefore, personally, I still think that the actual resume interview is more reliable. After looking for a job on TV, the reality is often not as good as the performance in the program.

Netizen 5: The live interview of the program is sloppy, the enterprises themselves are uneven, and the bosses are even more unreliable. What good results can there be?

The program should be effective, so many times, it is not reliable to look at the high salary without interviewing or applying for a job.

Remember that a training company in Tianjin Satellite TV offered a high salary to a girl in front of a national audience, but was finally told privately that the salary was not like this?

Although it was solved later, the attitude of the column group to solve this matter was really ambiguous, indicating that the program group itself was unreliable.

Think about it, there are all candidates, bosses or human resources leaders, and there are no experts in human resources.

If there is a lack of third-party commentators, people always feel that they are not thorough enough, not good enough and unfair.

Nowadays, many TV programs are ugly, mainly due to the lack of inside information and the continuous improvement of people's cultural quality, but the level of these programs still stays more than 30 years ago.