How to treat the public toilet administrator with bachelor degree?

On March 2, the recruitment brochure of a public institution in Wuhan caused controversy. Hongshan District Urban Management Committee Public Toilet Management Station wants to recruit two public toilet administrators, and the minimum academic qualification is undergraduate. Netizens spit, don't study hard, and manage a toilet is unqualified.

The netizen's question is that recruiting an undergraduate to manage toilets is a bit overqualified. In fact, the recruiting unit made it very clear that it recruited managers of public toilets, not cleaners, and took out career preparation. This is a very serious public examination. It is normal to require a bachelor's degree or above. Moreover, who said that the management of public toilets has no technical content? This kind of administrator-like role requires certain professional ability.

Generally speaking, public toilets are a window to observe the civilization of a city. Is it reasonable to set up public toilets? Is the layout reasonable? Are the facilities reasonable? There is a lot of knowledge in it; To Xiaoli, these administrators are responsible for several public toilets, and their main work is the daily inspection and maintenance of public toilets, finding problems and solving them. This job is not as easy as imagined.

Therefore, in the traditional discourse system, such an argument is unsolvable. Who should I listen to? We might as well look at the problem from another angle, such as whether it is necessary to set up a public toilet administrator post, and further, is there a better way to manage public toilets?

In the field of public management, there are many positions like toilet administrators. Public toilet administrators, garden administrators and community service personnel ... because they go deep into the details of urban management, the number may be very large, and it is impossible for every post to come up with career preparation to solve the problem. In this case, the establishment will become a huge social burden. And this kind of all-encompassing management of the government is not necessarily the most ideal.

The government might as well try to outsource services, introduce social forces, decentralize public functions through buyout, and retreat to management responsibilities. This not only improves the efficiency, but also avoids the excessive expansion of the establishment. The maturity of social forces also helps government departments to liberate themselves from heavy daily affairs and focus on supervision.

If you can give it to the market, you might as well give it to the market. Learning to solve problems by market means may bring completely different effects. If the market decides what kind of people to use, the controversy will be much smaller, and it may also be a reasonable way to allocate resources. Take the public toilet administrator recruited in Wuhan this time. After the open recruitment, it is estimated that it will be robbed again. But is this enthusiasm for managing public toilets or for career establishment?

Big society and small government, this is the reality of social development. The increase of public affairs and the relative lag of management are forcing government departments to look at problems with more new ideas and new angles. For example, in the construction of "Internet plus public services", Internet companies and third-party forces have been introduced in many places, and government departments need to spend a lot of money to solve the problem. Maybe they just need to add a function to the Internet platform, so why not?