Is it responsible for the parking lot being zoned?

Legal analysis: Under normal circumstances, property companies are not liable for tort compensation in principle. However, according to the relevant provisions of the property contract, it may be liable for breach of contract. The specific analysis is as follows: classify the vehicle as a typical civil tort. The imputation principle of tort is the fault principle, that is, only the fault can bear civil liability, and at the same time, the civil liability is "whoever infringes compensation" Therefore, the rower should bear all tort liability and compensate the owner for the loss. From the point of view of contract, it is first necessary to clarify whether there is a vehicle storage contract between the owner and the property company, that is, whether the vehicle is damaged and whether the property company bears the responsibility. Judging from the property contract between the owner and the property management company, if the property performs the duties of inspection and equipment maintenance on time according to the contract, it will not bear the liability for breach of contract for violating the property contract.

Legal basis: Regulations on Property Management

Article 34 The owners' committee shall sign a written realty service contract with the realty service enterprise selected by the owners' congress. Property service contracts shall stipulate property management matters, service quality, service fees, rights and obligations of both parties, management and use of special maintenance funds, property management premises, contract term, liability for breach of contract, etc.

Article 35 A realty service enterprise shall provide corresponding services in accordance with the stipulations of the realty service contract. The realty service enterprise fails to perform the realty service contract, causing personal and property safety damage to the owner, and shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law.