Do you need to bear legal responsibility for sending horror videos in WeChat group?

Deliberately intimidating others requires legal responsibility.

Article 42 of the Law on Public Security Administration Punishment commits one of the following acts, and shall be detained for less than five days or fined less than five hundred yuan; If the circumstances are serious, they shall be detained for more than five days and less than ten days, and may be fined up to five hundred yuan:

(1) writing threatening letters or threatening the personal safety of others by other means;

(2) publicly insulting others or fabricating facts to slander others;

(3) fabricating facts, falsely accusing and framing others, and attempting to subject others to criminal investigation or public security administration punishment;

(4) Threatening, insulting, beating or retaliating against witnesses and their close relatives;

(5) sending obscene, insulting, intimidating or other information for many times to interfere with the normal life of others;

(six) voyeurism, sneak shots, eavesdropping, spreading the privacy of others.

Extended data

Case:

On May 2, an informed owner published a net post, "The owners of famous houses in South Asia are threatened by their lives because they support the industry committee? State the cause and process of the incident: Since the Ming Di Community in South Asia has not set up an industry committee since the handover in 2009, the daily management of Suntech Property needs to be improved. For this reason, since last year, Xiong and other enthusiastic owners have taken the lead in setting up industry committees, hoping to improve the daily management order of the community.

On the evening of April 30, a "threatening letter" attacking the bear by name was publicly posted on the door of the building where he lived. After the incident, Xiong asked Suntech Property to collect video surveillance twice that night and the next day, and the other party refused to provide it for various reasons. In desperation, Xiong and other owners can only go to the police station in the jurisdiction to call for help.

"The incident has been suspected of breaking the law and the community has no right to dispose of it." According to a person in charge of the South Asian community, after the incident, the community also came forward to coordinate in time and invited the police station in the jurisdiction to intervene in the investigation in time.

"Because of the limited monitoring scope, it is still impossible to find out who did it." The police in the South Asian community of Jianpanshan Police Station introduced that on May 3, the police had transferred relevant monitoring to investigate, but as of press time, there was no trace of the suspect, and the case needed further investigation and handling.

"No matter what causes the incident, public slander and threats have been suspected of violating the law." The police stressed that even if there is a debt dispute, similar graffiti and intimidation are illegal acts, and relevant legal responsibilities should be investigated according to law; If you make a public slander out of nothing, it is suspected of libel.

People's Network-The owner was posted with a "threatening letter" at the entrance of the building. The police have been involved in the investigation.