The property area of second-hand houses is much smaller than the actual area. What's the problem?

The tax area involved in second-hand housing transactions is generally a transaction procedure. This tax is calculated according to the area on the real estate license, and has nothing to do with the actual use area of the house.

The area on the real estate license is smaller than the actual use area, which generally exists in duplex houses or villa houses. Sometimes, the attached area of some ordinary residential developers may also produce this situation.

"Second-hand housing" mostly becomes personal consumer goods with the commercialization of housing, and its "identity" is complex, so it is very important to understand its property rights. Special attention should be paid to houses with disputed or partial property rights (such as public houses purchased at standard prices), and those with property rights, unclear property rights and no property rights, even if the house is no better, will not get the property certificate after the transaction.

Extended data:

In September this year, Ms. He bought this second-hand house located in the family courtyard of Cao Zhou Road Information Engineering School in Heze City for 290,000 yuan through a real estate agent. Soon, Ms. He went to the Peony District Housing Management Bureau of Heze City to handle the transfer procedures. According to the property ownership certificate, the address of the house is Room 2, Building 3 of this family hospital, with a construction area of 74.9 1 m2, and the house was built in 1998.

However, shortly after moving in, Ms. He found a small problem when paying gas and water bills. The payment address is Room 2, Building 2, and Building 3 becomes Building 2. What happened? Ms. He immediately found a real estate agent.

The agent said that the property may have marked the building number wrong. This explanation did not dispel Ms. He's doubts. She then went to the Peony District Housing Management Bureau for an inquiry. This inquiry is tantamount to a "bolt from the blue" for Ms. He.

There are actually two "owners" in the property right of Room 2 of Building No.3, one is Ms. He, and the other is a person named Dong. However, in Room 2, Building 2, where Ms. He lives now, the item of "householder" in the housing information is blank. This unexpected discovery really surprised the couple. Has she been cheated?

The house corresponding to Ms. He's real estate license is located on the south side of the house where she actually lives, with different building numbers and different units. After discovering that the real estate information of the house was inconsistent with the house where she lived, Ms. He asked the Mudan District Real Estate Surveying and Mapping Brigade to issue a floor plan of Room 2 of Building 2.

But this floor plan shows that the house was built in 1993, with an area of only 60.93 square meters. Compared with the information on the property ownership certificate, it is not only 14 square meter smaller, but also five years larger.

The house I spent all my savings on is inexplicably less 14 square meter. No matter who changed it, it could not be accepted by anyone. So, is there a problem with the information on the real estate license? Or did Ms. He buy the wrong house? What's wrong with this missing 14 square meter?

65438+February 14, the reporter and Ms. He came to the Housing Management Bureau of Mudan District, Heze City. After explaining the purpose, the staff of the Housing Authority collected all the property rights information of Ms. He. The reporter found that this house is a transformed house. The original owner was Zhang. On 20 13, Zhang sold the house to Ms. He's former owner, Mr. Wang.

The staff of the Housing Authority explained that when handling the transfer procedures, Zhang provided the wrong housing information, which led to an error in the real estate license. Although the information provided by the owners is wrong, did the Housing Authority not verify the transfer for them?

The explanation given by the staff member is that this building has been mapped 20 12, which means that the information is already in the computer. When Wang came to apply, he applied for Building No.3, so the Housing Authority didn't have to go to the scene when it lost the map, and there was already data, so there was no need to collect data.

It turned out that for this reason, the house bought by Ms. He was inexplicably less 14 square meter. Ms. He felt sorry for the overpayment of 14 square meter and the five-year house damage, but now, the house can't be changed. Ms. He just wants to modify the housing information and recover the loss. So, who should bear the responsibility in this matter? What is the attitude of all parties concerned?

The Housing Authority said it would revise the listing information, but did not respond to who should bear the responsibility. The staff of the housing agency said that if there is any problem with the housing information, what they can do is to actively coordinate with the original owner. Mr. Wang, the former owner, also said that he would not bear the 60,000 yuan loss compensation proposed by Ms. He. He is only willing to pay back three or five thousand dollars, and there will be no more.

Then, who should bear the loss of Ms. He? Who is the most responsible of these parties? Some lawyers believe that the Mudan District Housing Authority obviously has serious dereliction of duty.

China News Network-The actual area of a citizen buying a second-hand house in Heze, Shandong Province is smaller than the proof 14 square meter.