When the owner's hotel in a residential area in Guangzhou was isolated, the door was unlocked. Is the property move suspected of breaking the law?

In fact, from a legal point of view, this practice has been suspected of breaking the law. After all, it belongs to entering the private room without the permission of others, which can be considered as illegal intrusion. However, this happened during the epidemic air defense, and all the staff just wanted to make the work go smoothly. There were really no other illegal acts. Although it is suspected of breaking the law, it is also worthy of forgiveness.

On July 8, COVID-19, a resident of Banghua Star Apartment, was found to be positive in the screening of nucleic acid detection in Hailong Street. According to epidemic prevention requirements, two buildings in the apartment are high-risk areas after risk investigation and judgment. On July 9, after repeated investigation and comparison, it was found that in addition to those who had been transferred to hospital for isolation, there were also close contacts hidden at home. COVID-19 nucleic acid was tested that night, and some people were positive. In the early morning of July 10, Helen street, community neighborhood Committee and property management personnel should do it as soon as possible to prevent new community communication? Due? Should we separate? Conduct an emergency investigation and go upstairs to 84 households again, and close the door immediately after unlocking and confirming the whole process video. At the same time, the surrounding area of the building is fully enclosed, the 24-hour obligation to ensure the safety of residents is strengthened, and new locks are installed for residents one after another.

The above-mentioned emergency door-to-door inspection method is simple and rude, ignoring the feelings of residents and hurting the feelings of the masses. After the incident, the person in charge of Khyron Street apologized to every resident, admitted his mistake and promised compensation. I am deeply saddened by this simple and rude misconduct in epidemic prevention and control, and sincerely apologize to the residents and the masses. After the incident, the district immediately set up an investigation team to conduct a comprehensive and in-depth investigation. According to the survey results, stakeholders will deal with it seriously according to the law and discipline. ?

Generally speaking, it is necessary to cooperate with the staff for screening during the epidemic air defense period, but it is impossible to do so. After all, it is illegal, and it is untenable if people don't understand the behavior of prosecuting court staff.