Do things lost in the garage have anything to do with the property?

Things were stolen in the community, and the property management company, as the security manager of the community, needs to bear certain responsibilities.

(1) If the property fails to fulfill the obligation to ensure the safety of the residential area as stipulated in the property contract, resulting in the loss of the owner's articles, the property needs to compensate the owner;

(2) The property has fulfilled the obligations stipulated in the property contract and the obligation to ensure the safety of the community. If the owner loses his car, the property does not need compensation.

Owners can't simply say whether the property should be compensated, it depends on the actual situation. Encounter this kind of problem, it is suggested to look at the service quality and service scope of the property company in the property service contract first, and compare it to see if the property company has done this. If not, you need to collect evidence, and you can sue the property company to the court to bear certain responsibilities. In other words, it is impossible for the property company to fully compensate the owner's theft.

Property management companies are not managers, but service providers. Once there is a dispute with the property management company, you can take up legal weapons to safeguard your legitimate rights and interests. At the same time, the case also sounded the alarm for all property management companies. Although the property management company has no obligation to keep the owner's property without special agreement with the owner, the property management company must fulfill its promised obligations and minimum safety precautions. Paragraph 2 of Article 36 of China's Property Management Regulations stipulates: "If a property management enterprise fails to fulfill the stipulations of the property service contract, causing personal and property safety damage to the owner, it shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law." Article 3 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Laws in the Trial of Property Service Disputes, which just came into effect on June 10 this year, stipulates: "If a property service enterprise fails to perform or fails to fully perform the maintenance, maintenance, management and repair obligations agreed in the property service contract or determined by laws, regulations and relevant industry norms, the people's court shall support it if the owner requests the property service enterprise to bear the liabilities for breach of contract such as continuing to perform, taking remedial measures or compensating for losses. The service commitments and service rules made by the realty service enterprise shall be recognized as an integral part of the realty service contract. "

Legal basis: Article 22 of the Regulations on Property Management, the construction unit shall formulate a temporary management statute before selling the property, and make an agreement on the use, maintenance and management of the property, the interests of the owner, the obligations that the owner should perform, and the responsibilities that the owner should bear if he violates the temporary management statute. The temporary management regulations formulated by the construction unit shall not infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of property buyers.