Property appraisal is not standardized.

Liu Laobo went to Hangzhou to see his daughter. He wandered around the community at night and was late. He wanted to go back to his three daughters' homes, but he accidentally fell down in the garage of two buildings because of dark. The daughter took the reporter to find the property company. She believes that there is no warning sign on the property, which causes the old man to fall. Now that the elderly have no money to treat diseases, the property should be compensated.

It's heartbreaking to have a broken lumbar spine at such an old age, but sympathy belongs to sympathy, and the truth should be made clear. Pedestrians are not allowed to enter these two garages. The old man fell down because he was not familiar with the road conditions and didn't see the road clearly. Whether warning signs are set in the property is secondary. Even if a warning sign is set, it may not be visible in the dark unless a cover is added to the garage.

The old man's daughter is also at fault in this matter. The old man came all the way to see her. He is a stranger in a strange place, and he doesn't know to look for it when it is dark. When something happened, he claimed that the old man had no money to see a doctor. If the property does not compensate the money, will the elderly still have to pay compensation? Many people have become accustomed to shirking their responsibilities when something goes wrong, never admitting that they are wrong, and others are not "wronged" psychologically.

This statement is obviously unreasonable. To put it bluntly, it is touching porcelain. Of course, this trend should not be supported and encouraged.

Garage belongs to the building infrastructure, just like the stairs in the corridor. When we take the stairs, we know that we should be careful of the steps slowly to avoid falling down. So are the steps of the garage. Everyone who goes to the garage should have this sense of safety. The garage staircase is a fixed building, not a temporary building or reconstruction of the property, so there is no fault in this respect, and the unreasonable demands of the elderly can be completely ignored.

Clear water means no fish. If we all want to compensate for the losses caused by our negligence, then warning signs may be all over the streets, and it is not clear at night whether we should compensate for the stones on the roadside. Do I have to pay for hitting a tree or a pig at night? If an owner drives home at night and hits the door of the community as a garage, should he pay for it?

Moreover, even if there are warning signs, the elderly are expected to claim compensation. They say why warning signs can't be as obvious as traffic lights and why they can't shine at night. Why can't the property arrange security to carry the old man upstairs?

Adults should have basic life knowledge and safety awareness, and can't always ask others to remind them. For people who lack safety awareness, even if clear warning signs are set, I don't think they will read them. If it hurts, it still hurts.

Property companies should learn from this accident. Since someone fell and suggested that there were no warning signs, put up more. General property will pay public * * * liability insurance, since the old man has an accident in the community, try to bear part of the insurance. However, if the family members insist on all kinds of compensation, it is recommended to take legal procedures. As for the reconciliation proposal put forward by the reporter on the spot, this scheme is not desirable. It's best to find out the right and wrong, or more people will fall down and claim compensation in the future.