Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Damaged property banner

Damaged property banner

I am also very concerned about this matter. As a result, the owner was asked to pay 3000 yuan, and then publicly apologized, but for the owner, he definitely quit. Because of the problems reflected by the owners, the property was not properly solved at all, so the owners sent banners to the property in this way.

The main reason is that the cement in the corner of the owner's own bay window fell off, and some of it fell off, almost hitting passers-by. This is very dangerous. We have been talking about the problem of throwing objects at high altitude, but if cement falls at this height, people will die. This problem should have been dealt with long ago, and it should not be delayed or passive.

In addition, there are cracks in the house and leaks in the garage. If you don't do the right thing, you just want to collect money This time you send him a banner and sue the owner for compensation. Moreover, when the property brought the owner to court, it actually demanded 500,000 compensation. Seeing the compensation you want is really a lion's mouth. For me, if the owner can have a better solution and a better supervision department to supervise, and the property solves this housing problem, the owner may be happy and will not use this behavior to protect rights.

Of course, the court also clearly pointed out that the protection of citizens' rights should be carried out within a reasonable range and must not cross the legal boundaries, otherwise it will bear the corresponding adverse consequences. But for the owners, they are definitely not satisfied and should complain. The reason is simple, because he has the responsibility and obligation to maintain the house and deal with the problem of cement falling.

In my opinion, the owner is helpless, but the owner's practice is really improper and the property is not done right. It is very positive not to claim compensation, so I would feel angry if I were you, but safeguarding rights should be done through formal channels, not by damaging the reputation of the relevant companies.