Chain operation of property management

Chain operation and contract system of property management

At present, most property companies are subsidiaries of real estate companies, so many jobs are restricted by developers, and they do not give in to each other in disputes between owners and developers. Everyone will encounter a lot of resistance, but many companies are directly facing the developers, so they will be accused by the owners in the future property management, and it is a headache to collect property fees. After the developer leaves, he can only earn money to support himself, but every penny he earns must be handed over to the head office, and every penny must go through such a procedure. If he encounters something urgent, he may be delayed and lose more. Branches must abide by the regulations of the head office, so many things become contradictions. The development of the country should consider the national conditions, and the development of the company should also be based on the nature of each community.

A company may manage many communities, large and small, high-grade and economical, so the services provided for different communities are different. Some communities can charge a lot of property fees and parking fees, while others can only charge a little money. If the same service is provided, the community with lower fees may not make money or make money. In addition, according to some regulations of the company, it can't develop some new services to increase revenue. What can be developed has to be transferred to the head office. Therefore, it is unknown whether you can get recognition for your more efforts than others. Who wants to do more with the same salary? How to arouse their enthusiasm? Also a security guard. The workload of big communities and small communities is different, but the salary is the same. Who doesn't want to get the same money and can work less? Where does the increase in income come from and how to mobilize the enthusiasm of employees? Squeezing into a boat is like going back to the Great Leap Forward era. What is the result of eating the same pot? The overall problem has affected the independent innovation and development of a management office.

Modern society is an era of individuality. Every community has its own personality, and there is no creativity if it is exactly the same. Therefore, chain operation or contract operation has become a new bright spot of property management. Each community carries out different special services according to the situation of its own community. Of course, public services can be unified as a corporate image. Each community is self-sufficient and can earn high wages. According to the situation, a certain proportion of income will be turned over to the head office, and part of it will be reserved for self-development and employee welfare, so that whoever does not want to make more money will not lose the return to the head office.

Isn't it the principle of distribution according to work to let the management office play freely and let them find their own food? Needless to say, what is the result of equalitarianism. For high-end residential areas, they can also provide better services according to their own conditions, and employees can get the greatest benefits. So who wants to leave here and who doesn't want to get more money and do a good job? For low-income communities, in order to generate income, they will also find better ways to increase their wallets by adding more different special services and special services. What is unified management for? Isn't it just to improve the company's brand value and increase profits? However, a goal can be achieved in different ways, of course, choosing the best way to get more profits.

Chain operation and contract system have their own advantages, which is also the development direction of today's large group companies. For property companies, there are some differences, because property products are deterministic and uncertain, and their applicability to different communities is also different. Look at the food and eat it according to the situation. Give it more autonomy and freedom, reduce unnecessary management costs and improve work efficiency.