The owner of a villa in a residential area is in trouble with the property. The property said that the owner was illegal. Is it really illegal?

The owner of a villa in a residential area fought with the property, and the property said that the owner was illegal. The propaganda said such a thing. Since 137 has been leveled to 300 square meters, we have to do it according to their propaganda promise. Illegal construction does not exist, but exists in the differences between the two sides. The owners wanted to carry it through, and even the row owners agreed and signed it. At present, the property does not agree, and it should be arranged according to their design. Since it is the owner's own house, why can't he decide for himself?

The problem left by the developer to the owner, now the property management company does not agree with the owner to change 137 to 300. Since the developer promised to change 137 to 300, it should fulfill its promise. As can be seen from the video, the owners have jointly signed and written materials to the property management company, but the property management company simply ignored them. Therefore, this matter itself is very difficult. The property management company must ask the owners to fulfill the dream of changing 137 to 300 according to their ideas, otherwise you will be illegal and resolutely demolished. Therefore, this matter should be discussed together, and the construction of property companies should listen to the voice of the owners.

The design scheme given by the property management company is unacceptable to most business owners. Speaking of thermal insulation and waterproofing, the owner responded that this matter was asked by the property management company, but they said that the leader was a designer and he liked this design style. The owner must follow this plan, otherwise it is illegal construction. Even TV reporters went to interview, but they were squeezed out. They didn't contact the TV station for two days, and the host said that they would continue to pursue it. Since the operator has agreed to this kind of thing, and the use area is less than 300 square meters, why can't we listen to the opinions of the operator? According to this plan? Is it the difference between the property company and the business owner, or other problems?

The two sides should sit together as soon as possible to discuss this matter and come up with a better solution. Hiding can't solve the problem, but it will cause great contradictions. This kind of thing should be open and clear, and the reasonable behavior of business households should not be rejected for other reasons.