Is it necessary for the industry Committee to get paid?

It is a good thing that the industry committee is encouraged, which also reflects the trend of specialization of the industry committee, but there is always a feeling of "paying my own salary". I am not an owner at a young age, but I also have the experience of being an owner for my friends. I think the industry committee is just an autonomous organization with prestige and status. There is no need to receive that salary. After receiving the salary, the nature changed. When my friend first moved here, there was no industry committee in the whole community, and the property was an early property company found by the developer. When decorating a house, I deal with developers and properties. The feeling is that developers want to give up after building a house. The property company is the "little brother" of the developer. Although the owner paid the property fee, the property management company never treated you as the owner. To put it more vividly, "property is like a servant girl sent by her mother's family to her husband's family, and most people really can't move her." Industry Committee is a bit like "being a family member", representing the interests of all owners. Once the industry committee is established, the first thing to do is to get rid of the "servant girl-pre-property" and choose a "servant girl" who listens to his own words. Family members should also regularly give some income to the "maid" to maintain the normal expenses of the family. We should also criticize "maids" for spending money indiscriminately, not doing a good job or family members not paying their income ... There is no precedent for "family members" to get paid like "maids", which will also damage their status. In addition, in the final analysis, the industry Committee is only an autonomous organization, not an administrative agency or enterprise. After the property company selected by the industry committee takes over the community, the work of the industry committee will be much easier, and the focus of work will shift to supervising the work of the property company, and it is a bit unreasonable for me to hand over such an autonomous institution responsible for supervising others. Let's go back to the metaphor of "being a family member". If we are to be a "family member" again at this time, there will definitely be gossip, and everyone will strive to be a "family member" because "family members" can work, earn money and benefit their families. Why not? So I said, it's best not to pay wages to the industry Committee, but to give them enough prestige and trust. As far as I know, the reality is that the industry Committee is generally composed of a group of pioneers of rights protection. Because the establishment of the industry Committee is equivalent to breaking the good relationship between developers and property management in the early stage, it will generally be rejected by developers and property companies in the early stage. They dare to compete with many forces and finally win through hard work. They are regarded as leaders by most owners, but leaders are not positions and do not need to be paid. Paying wages will reduce their sense of honor and go against the original intention of their efforts. Zhang Likang