The elevator broke down and the property management asked us for maintenance fees, but we rented the house. Should this maintenance fee be paid?

At that time, after the transaction between the landlord and the developer, they usually paid the public maintenance fund, and the general ratio was 1 of the total loan. 5% and the elevator belongs to the community public facilities. Therefore, if the elevator is broken, it should not be borne by the property buyers, and it should not be borne by you as a tenant. Because this branch has already paid for the maintenance of some public facilities, how can the property company charge it again? The above is the explanation after the commercial housing transaction in general. If the buyer of the house, that is, the landlord, fails to go through the relevant payment procedures when he moves in or pays the fee. To say the least, it should not be passed on to the lessee. The expenses shall be borne by the buyer. So, although the tenant is the actual user of the elevator (for a certain period of time), how can the use cost and maintenance cost of the elevator be blurred? The use cost of general elevators is included in the property fee, and the maintenance of elevators, including the overhaul of public facilities, is included in the public maintenance fund. Can the lessee and the buyer be unclear, and can the property company be unclear? That doesn't make sense, does it Should such a property company improve itself? Big loss of standard! !