Is it wise or shameful for the group to "sell off" its assets after watson biological plunged?

At present, many friends are discussing this matter, especially in the capital market, because many investors have reached this stage of income after investing in this company, but this company has sold its assets, which is actually very serious for investors, and many institutional investors have also been hurt. We can analyze it from the following three aspects. I think this company is a wise move.

In the short term, it is still money.

The reason why the company sold its assets cheaply was entirely because it was affected by everything in a short time. In today's society, capital will become the biggest demand of a company. Only by having sufficient long-term influence of capital can we get more benefits, which is actually beneficial to ourselves.

The company's business is being adjusted.

I think one of the most important reasons is that the company's business is being adjusted, and attracting a lot of money will inevitably lose money in this process, which is also for the long-term adjustment of the company's business.

Get more resources

In fact, after selling these assets, we can get more resources and invest these resources in other fields to get more returns. Although the current business is relatively profitable, the company must make long-term plans.

From the analysis of the above three aspects, I think the group did it entirely for its own interests and for long-term consideration, because this company has been hit to some extent at present and wants to obtain the stable development of its own company, so it will do this operation. In fact, many investors think that this is a cheap sale of assets, but it does not occupy the height of the group. There used to be such a company in the A-share market. After selling my most profitable business, I gained higher growth opportunities and gained more benefits. These things are far-sighted operations.