Is it a hidden danger that the fire prevention responsibility book is not signed?

1. Failure to sign the fire prevention responsibility letter is a hidden danger.

2. Article 21 of the Fire Protection Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that smoking and the use of naked flames are prohibited in places with fire and explosion hazards. Defendant Zhang Moumou, as the co-responsible person of * * *, used an open flame to burn rapeseed shells in a place with serious fire hazards, and left the scene without confirming whether the fire was completely extinguished, which was a serious violation of fire control regulations and a major fault. The factory is a closed area with no other fire source. Since it is impossible to find out the objective truth on the day of the incident, the judgment can only be made in strict accordance with the relevant provisions of the substantive law and the procedural law and according to the legal truth that has been found out. Article 108 of the Judicial Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law stipulates that if the people's court is convinced that there is a great possibility of the fact to be proved after examination and combining with relevant facts, it shall consider that the fact exists. Based on comprehensive judgment, it is very likely that there is a fire caused by the remaining kindling, and the story actually exists.

Second, the fire control obligations are not clearly defined, and the fire control responsibilities of managers are specifically divided. 1. The site owner is not responsible for promoting others' use without authorization. Theoretically speaking, in the case of separation of ownership from possession and control, fire control obligation is actually the responsibility of possession and control, which has nothing to do with ownership, that is, possession and control determine responsibility. In this case, when the owner of the factory, Yang Moumou, has long since disappeared, the owner has no right to occupy the site of the factory without authorization, and the owner of the factory has lost possession and control of the factory and should not bear the responsibility. 2. In the case that the person responsible for fire control is not clear, everyone in the place of use has the obligation to maintain fire safety. The possessor uses the site to store the goods in order to realize his own interests, and of course he has to bear the risks brought about by it. While maintaining the safety of his own property, the possessor ensures that it will not cause danger to the safety of others' property, so he has the obligation to pay attention to preventing fires, which is not only the obligation stipulated in the fire protection law, but also the requirement of neighboring rights in civil law. Therefore, all website users have management responsibilities and belong to managers. Article 18 of the Fire Protection Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates that if the same building is managed or used by two or more units, the fire safety responsibilities of all parties shall be clarified, the responsible persons shall be determined, and the evacuation passages, fire passages, building fire protection facilities and fire truck passages used by the building shall be uniformly managed. The law stipulates a scientific ideal state, but in this case, the site with serious hidden dangers is occupied and used by many people, and the fire responsibility and the person responsible for it are not clear, which is not uncommon in the vast rural areas, and even has certain representativeness. At this point, the plaintiff Zhang Laiqiao, the defendant Xie Moumou and the defendant Zhang Moumou are all managers, all of whom should bear the responsibility for fire prevention. 3. How to bear specific responsibilities when the responsible person is not clear. In the absence of a specific responsible person in the local area, there is still no specific legal provision on how to bear it. Generally speaking, everyone is in the same venue, but they occupy different spaces. Because there is no specific division of responsibilities, it should be a common state to sweep snow in front of your home, but it is obviously impossible to do a good job in fire prevention. Every user should do a good job in the fire safety within his own possession and control, and at the same time, he should do a good job in the fire safety of his own place of use and assist others to do a good job in the fire safety of his own area. Specifically, it should be comprehensively judged according to the occupied space, the number of flammable items placed, whether the fire escape is occupied, and the degree of management responsibility. In other words, the criterion for judging each user's responsibility is to make a comprehensive judgment based on whether he has done a good job in fire prevention in the occupied area and whether he has done a good job in fire prevention in the whole site. Specific to this case, Zhang Moumou has placed the most flammable items, and the occupied space does not meet the fire safety conditions. Serious violation of the fire protection law, the use of open flames eventually led to a fire, so it bears the main responsibility and bears 65% of the losses; Xie Moumou placed a large number of flammable items and did not have fire safety conditions. He found that smoking did not take measures in time, and he took secondary responsibility, that is, 25% of the loss; Plaintiff Zhang Laiqiao parked his car in a greenhouse with serious hidden dangers and was not easy to move, and assumed certain responsibilities, namely 10% loss.

3, fire fighting behavior belongs to the courageous behavior, does not have a major fault, does not assume responsibility. Courage is to protect the interests of the state and the collective or the personal and property safety of others, regardless of personal safety, to the ongoing criminal acts.

How to deal with the loss of parking in the mall?

Mr. Lin went to a shopping mall for dinner and shopping on the evening of February 20 16 14, and put his electric bicycle in the parking shed designated by the mall, and locked the rear wheel lock and chain lock. That night, the electric bike was lost. As can be seen from the surveillance video of the shopping mall, Mr. Lin's electric bicycle was stolen by more than two people crossing the short column outside the parking shed of the shopping mall and loading it into the trunk of a car. Mr. Lin believes that the design of the carport in the shopping mall is unreasonable, the column on the outside of the road is low, and the ground lock frame is not designed, which leads to a great risk of theft even if the bicycle is locked twice, and the security guards in the shopping mall are negligent in patrolling, so the shopping mall has lost him. ...

Published on 20 17.06.26

Why are most property disputes lost by the owners?

Today (June 15) morning, the Beijing No.2 Intermediate People's Court released three typical cases of property service contract disputes concluded by the court at the news briefing. Judging from the trial results, in most cases, the property company's property fee request will be fully or partially supported, and the owner will lose the case. Case 1: The owner thinks that the property fee standard is too high and refuses to pay the property fee. A company sued Gao for paying property fees, and Gao complained that the quality of property services did not meet the agreement and the breach of contract came first; There is no basis for the property fee, and the standard of the property fee is not recognized, and the court is required to reduce the property fee. The court held through trial that a certain ...

Published on 20 17.06.23

How to advocate the company to cancel the treatment of work-related injury insurance in litigation

In the referee's lawsuit, the company was cancelled and the employee applied to change the shareholders of the company into defendants according to law; The people's court shall focus on examining the effectiveness of the liquidation report of the company and the resolution of the shareholders' meeting to confirm the liquidation report. Where the company registration authority cancels the legal person qualification with false liquidation report and fails to carry out liquidation according to law, it shall support employees to claim that shareholders shall bear corresponding liability for compensation for the company's debts according to law. Case 2014 September 16, the resolution of the first shareholders' meeting of a company in Fugou is as follows: Zhang Moujia and Li Mouyi contributed 20 million yuan as shareholders, Zhang. ...

Published on 20 17.06.23

Is there no unilateral termination clause to terminate the property service contract?

In case No.2013, the plaintiff was an owners' committee in Longmenhao Street, Nan 'an District, and signed a property service contract with a property management company of the defendant. The term of the contract is five years, and there are no conditions for termination in the contract. Later on 20 16, 2 1 March, members of the owners' committee issued a notice to the property management company on the grounds that there were major defects in the property services.

We will ask the merchants for invoices after buying goods or eating. Invoices are business vouchers issued and collected by all units and individuals in buying and selling goods, providing or receiving services and engaging in other business activities. ...

When will the purchase invoice be given?

When we buy a house, some invoices are very important, but when you buy a house, you usually need invoices.