The owner pays the property fee. It stands to reason that the owner should be the boss. Why should the owner listen to the property?

This is a very tangled problem, because it is not an employment relationship or a labor contract, but a property service contract between the two parties. It is equivalent to saying that the contractual relationship between the owner and the property management company is based on the building, not the owner. To put it more bluntly, the property management company works for the buildings agreed in the contract, such as the public facilities in the community, not your owners. Why should they listen to the owners?

What's in the contract signed by the property? That is, for example, there are some public facilities, fire-fighting facilities and sanitation in the community. What needs to be done is clearly stated in the contract. People's property provides these services according to regulations, and the owners pay property fees. This is all in accordance with the contract, not the owner and the property signed a labor contract, I will do whatever you want.

The service fee given is not called salary, which is a misunderstanding of the relationship between the property company and the main building. Don't think that just because I pay the money, you have to listen to my command, and you have to do whatever I ask you to do. This attitude is that you don't understand the contents of the contract, and the property has the right to refuse services beyond the scope of the contract.

Some people seem to buy a house and think that the property is their own nanny company. Understand that your owners are a whole, and you are the whole who signed a contract with them. If an individual owner breaches the contract, it is equivalent to your whole breach of contract, and it belongs to the wrong party who breaches the contract first. It is necessary to understand the subject relationship.