The house is on the first floor, and the elevator fee is the same as others. Is this reasonable? Is everyone the same? ? Add it up to 1.2 yuan one square!

It feels a bit unreasonable, but the property fee is really collected like this. At present, there are few regulations in this regard. The following can be referenced: Chongqing According to the document No.778 of Chongqing Price Bureau (2004), the residential elevator fee is charged according to the permanent population (continuous residence for more than 3 months). If the owner on the second floor voluntarily doesn't take the elevator, he can start from the third floor without charging the elevator fee. If the owners of the first floor, the second floor and the negative first floor voluntarily do not take the elevator, the elevator fee may not be charged; But if you are willing to take the elevators on the second floor and the negative first floor, you must charge the elevator fee according to the regulations. Guangzhou In May, 2007, Guangzhou Price Bureau issued the elevator cost allocation method using the floor coefficient method, that is, according to the floor, floors 2-5 are the first segment, and the coefficient is1; The 6th floor to 10 is the second section, and the coefficient is1.2; The third section is from 10 to 15, with a coefficient of 1.4. By analogy, if the coefficient of each segment is increased by 20%, the users who don't use the elevator at the bottom will not have to share it. According to the Measures for the Administration of Urban Property Management Service Charges in Hunan Province, the property fee is calculated according to the building area, not according to the floor. Therefore, the current property management fee in our province is charged according to the "one-fee system", that is, all floor owners pay the same property management fee, including the same elevator use fee. This kind of problem will be solved sooner or later, just a matter of time, hehe, a little depressed.