The elevator charging standard for high-rise residential buildings is brewing. How to charge for high-rise residential buildings?

The standard of elevator operation fee for high-rise residential buildings in this city is brewing to be adjusted, and it is tentatively scheduled to solicit opinions in the middle of next month. The reporter learned from the Municipal Price Bureau that this consultation will raise the 4 yuan standard per person per month, which has been implemented for 10 years. The specific increase has not yet been determined. However, whether the elevator fee is levied according to the head or the area, and whether the residents on the first floor levy the elevator fee is still the focus of controversy.

The reporter learned from the Municipal Price Bureau yesterday that the elevator charging standard for high-rise residential buildings is tentatively scheduled for public consultation in the middle and late next month. The existing elevator charging standard is the Notice on Regulating Elevator Charging in High-rise Residential Buildings promulgated and implemented in 2000, which has been 13 years. It is understood that this adjustment will increase the current 4 yuan elevator charging standard for each person above 12 floors per month.

Last year, the municipal price department calculated the cost of nine residential quarters serviced and managed by nine property companies in the city. The conclusion is that the average elevator operation and maintenance cost is 30.73 yuan/month, and the cost per square meter is 0.35 yuan/month according to the construction area. According to the average family population of 2.8 people, the monthly elevator fee per person should be 10.975 yuan, which is 6.975 yuan different from the current monthly 4 yuan fee per person.

After comprehensive calculation, the operating cost of elevators in high-rise residential buildings is per person per month 12 yuan. According to this standard, the annual cost will increase by nearly 100 yuan. The price bureau said that considering the high price increase, there is a gap between the final fee and the estimated cost, and the adjustment range has not yet been determined. The government will fully consider the operating costs and the affordability of the public and adopt a gradual adjustment method.

The staff of the price bureau said that elevator charges are related to the interests of most business households and are highly concerned. This adjustment will solicit opinions and standardize the charging standards and behaviors in an open way.

Adjust one's thinking

Should residents on the first floor charge elevator fees?

Focus 1 12 floor residents negotiate tariffs.

Last year, the municipal price department has solicited opinions within a certain range, and revised the plan in combination with the opinions solicited. At present, one of the focuses of controversy is the management form. At present, small and high-rise buildings below 12 floors are subject to market adjustment prices, which are negotiated by elevator operators and users. However, the current situation is that the developer has made a good contract, which does not reflect the negotiation. This part of the problem should also be included in the management, and the specific management is still in the process of soliciting opinions.

The focus is on property fees, including elevator fees or separate charges.

Before 13, it was stipulated to collect by head, but now there is a model of collecting by area, which is more common at present. If it is levied by area, it is unfair that there are fewer households in a large area and more households in a small area. It seems more reasonable to levy according to the head.

If it is levied per head, do you use the elevator fee alone or adopt the charging mode that the property fee includes the elevator fee? The possible solution is to temporarily maintain the two forms from the perspective of safeguarding consumers' rights and interests. Because, if it is changed to a single charging form, the property company may still have the final say on the area. If the calculation basis is not sufficient, it is likely that the price adjustment factor will be completely added to consumers during the conversion process.

Focus on whether users on the first floor of the second floor charge elevator fees.

Judging from the situation in this city, the elevator fee levied on the operators on the first floor is relatively small, which is also a controversial issue in the country. From a legal point of view, elevators belong to public facilities. According to the Property Law, all owners should do their best to maintain and maintain public facilities. But businesses on the first floor generally don't use elevators, which is unfair.

Regarding the charging standard of the elevator on the first floor, in the draft of "Measures for the Administration of Property Service Charges in Beijing", the owner of the first floor paid 30%, but this item was deleted in the official document.

Lawyer Qiu, an expert volunteer of China Consumers Association, believes that it is obviously unreasonable for the owners on the first floor not to pay the elevator fee. The elevator is a public facility, and the owners of the first floor and other floors are the same owners of the elevator, and the owners of the first floor have the obligation to maintain the public facilities. However, the owners on the first floor don't need elevators, and it's unfair to pay the same elevator fee as other high-rise owners who use elevators more. The owner of the first floor can pay less appropriately. He believes that it is fair and reasonable to collect elevator fees by steps or sections.

Current elevator charging standard

First kind

Multi-storey, 12 floors below the small high-rise residential elevators, the implementation of market-adjusted prices, determined by elevator operators and users through consultation.

The second type

/kloc-the elevators in high-rise residential buildings above 0/2 floors are subject to government-guided prices. According to the Notice on Regulating Elevator Charges in High-rise Residential Buildings, which came into effect in June 2000, 4 yuan is charged per person per month.

existing problems

Question 1

Per head or per area?

Recently, a new high-rise residential building in Zhongnan Road changed the elevator fee from 4 yuan per person per month to 0.6 yuan per square meter per month. Take an 80-square-meter family of three as an example, the elevator fee has increased from 144 yuan/year to 576 yuan/year. Spending several hundred yuan more each year has aroused the dissatisfaction of the owners. However, the property management company said that the 4 yuan money per person per month was the standard of 10 years ago, and the elevator operation has seriously exceeded its income.

According to the staff of the Price Bureau, the monthly fee per person in 4 yuan is too low, and many residential development units integrate elevator fees into property fees. At present, there are two forms of elevator charging in the market. One is to charge separately; The other is included in the property fee.

Question 2

Should the elevator fee be included in the property fee?

The monthly property fee of a high-rise apartment in High-tech Zone is 2.2 yuan /m2, including management fee and elevator fee. As for the specific elevator fee, the owners are not clear.

The staff of the Price Bureau said that this way of collecting elevator fees from property fees is not transparent and standardized enough, which is not conducive to protecting the interests of owners. In addition, there are still problems such as collecting elevator cards, which need to be cleaned up urgently.

Question 3

How to charge for old high-rise residential buildings?

According to the staff of the Price Bureau, the problems existing in elevator charging are mainly concentrated in the old high-rise residential buildings in the late 1980s and early 1990s. First, there is no property management for such houses. Second, the property fee is low, and it is unprofitable for enterprises to invest in the renovation of elevators, which leads to outdated elevators and potential safety hazards.

(The above answers were published on 20 13-09- 17. Please refer to the current actual purchase policy. )

Sohu Focus Network provides you with comprehensive information such as real estate information, real estate details, purchase process, owners' forum and home decoration.