10 is social news related to law and corresponding legal comments.

Wu Ruilin: It is illegal to make an annual income of 300,000 yuan tax-free. It should be said that Guangdong's desire for high-end talents in the service industry is understandable. However, the author believes that the special preferential tax policy for senior talents proposed by CPPCC is tantamount to taking tax policies as prizes and distributing them at will, which is really difficult to agree with. On the one hand, it is contrary to existing laws. According to the newly revised individual income tax law of the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC), starting from March this year, the national tax threshold is 2000 yuan, that is, the monthly exemption amount is 2000 yuan. As a first-level government, Guangdong Province certainly has no right to increase the exemption quota without authorization and introduce policies that are inconsistent with national laws.

Two. The legal aid work in Huaibei City has made remarkable achievements and achieved good social benefits. Legal aid is a "popular project" for the government to serve the people. In order to lay a solid foundation for legal aid work, on the basis of sound legal aid in cities and counties (districts), all 27 townships in the city have established legal aid workstations, and 80% of communities (villages) have set up legal aid points, basically forming a legal aid system composed of cities, counties (districts), townships and communities.

Third, the family education mechanism in the legal society: How to face Liu Haiyang directly: In the discussion involving the legal responsibility of the actor, some people think that the actor's behavior should be recognized as the crime of illegally hunting and killing wild animals according to Article 34 1 of the Criminal Law, but the law protects the national wild animal resources, with the aim of punishing those behaviors that destroy wild animals and protecting the living environment of human beings. In the "bear injury incident", the parties did not harm animals in the general sense, let alone wild animals protected by the state. The five bears injured by Liu Haiyang were bought by the zoo for tens of thousands of yuan. In order to raise these animals, the zoo has invested a lot of manpower and material resources, built venues, equipped equipment and purchased feed. Moreover, the zoo also uses these animals to attract tourists to visit and earn commercial income. This shows that although these five kinds of bears still have the physiological characteristics of wild animals, they have actually been endowed with social attributes, that is, property attributes. The object of Liu's infringement is public property protected by national laws, and should be convicted and sentenced for the crime of intentionally destroying public and private property. Article 275 of the Criminal Law stipulates: "Whoever intentionally destroys public or private property in a large amount or has other serious circumstances shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or a fine; If the amount is huge or there are other particularly serious circumstances, it shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years. " In the process of handing over to the judicial organs, we should identify the judicial spirit of the parties concerned, and then consider his conviction and sentencing on this premise. If Liu Haiyang has no justifiable reason to exclude criminal responsibility, his behavior is consistent with the crime of intentionally destroying property.

4. Xie Yueming: The law slapped "paid news": On the morning of August 4, the case of Shanxi prosecutors going to Beijing to arrest CCTV female journalists was heard in Taiyuan. CoCo Lee, a former CCTV reporter, was convicted of accepting bribes and sentenced to three years' imprisonment with a suspended sentence of four years.

The law has given CoCo Lee a "heavy punch", which is actually a slap in the face of "paid news".

Paid news is an activity in which journalists take improper means to ask for material rewards from the interviewees. Paid news also includes activities of deliberately concealing and withholding news.

Paid news is an act that journalists of any ideology and any social system are not ashamed of. Regardless of the East or the West, paid news is prohibited by journalistic professional ethics. The essence of paid news is that some journalists illegally sell the right of news dissemination given by the state and society to news organizations as personal belongings of individuals and groups, and conduct illegal transactions of rights and money. Paid news is a reflection of "money worship" in the news field, and it is an unhealthy trend in the press. Its existence and spread is a shame for the news industry.

The harmfulness of paid news can be analyzed from three aspects: First, it destroys the principles of authenticity, objectivity and impartiality. Because paid news is an improper way to gain benefits by providing information services. In order to realize the interests of some individuals or groups, many paid news do not hesitate to exaggerate, distort facts, reverse black and white, reverse right and wrong, and seriously damage the public interest. The second is to reduce the quality of news reports. We know that the choice of information by mass media lies in news value. The standard of paid news selection is to fill the pages and programs with things with no news value or low news value for the publicity benefits needed by its clients, occupying the time and space of truly news-worthy reports, thus affecting the quality of news publicity reports. The third is the corrosion of the journalism team. Paid news makes some journalists corrupt, which not only destroys their personal reputation, but also damages the credibility of their media.

5. The decision to give up the treatment of the father of premature baby triggered a legal and moral discussion: Tu was found guilty and sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment, which was completely unexpected. Yesterday afternoon, the lawyer of Zhejiang Junan Century Law Firm who defended Tu told the reporter.

More than a month ago, Tu was prosecuted by Yuhang District People's Procuratorate because he gave up treating his premature son who weighed only 950 grams, but took the child home, resulting in the death of a one-day-old baby. (Morning Post reported on June 20th)

Yuhang District People's Court heard the case and made a first-instance judgment last week. The lawyer went to Yuhang Detention Center to meet Tu, who was detained, and asked Tu's opinion on the appeal.

During the whole meeting, Tu Cai Liang was very excited. The lawyer said that during the meeting for more than an hour, Tu always thought that he was not a medical expert and did not understand the law. He just listened to the doctor and thought that the child could not be cured and had no money to cure it, so he took the child home.

The income certificate issued by Tu's unit shows that Tu's annual income is 1.8 million yuan. According to the testimony of the nurses in the hospital where premature babies were born, the cost of treatment for premature babies is 1000 yuan to 2,000 yuan a day, which takes 2-3 months.

Can't give up the treatment of premature babies and be sentenced.

1 year, the court pronounced the sentence in August. Tu Cai Liang, who was initially released on bail pending trial, was put into prison on the day of the verdict. Yesterday, there were six days before the appeal deadline.

The court found through trial that on June 5438+ 10/day this year, Tu's wife gave birth to a baby boy prematurely, with a gestational age of 6 months and 25 days and a weight of 950g. The doctor told the slaughtered baby that it had symptoms such as dyspnea and underweight and needed to be rescued, but the rescue cost was high, and even if the baby survived, there might be sequelae. Unwilling to pay for his son's treatment, and worried that the child would leave sequelae when he grew up, Tu Cai Liang decided to give up the rescue without consulting his wife and others. Then he took the baby home from the neonatal department of the hospital and gave it to his mother for care. The baby died at 5 am the next day because it was not rescued.

The court held that the defendant Tu Cai Liang had a legal obligation to support his newborn son, but he gave up the necessary treatment for the baby for fear of increasing his financial burden, resulting in the death of the baby, which was a refusal to fulfill his obligation to support, and his behavior constituted a crime of abandonment. The charges charged by the public prosecution agency were established. Tu and his defender put forward an innocent defense opinion, which was rejected by the court. Therefore, the court of first instance found Tu Cai Liang guilty of abandonment and sentenced him to six months' imprisonment.

6. Wuhan anti-theft is suspected of killing thieves, which has aroused social concern. The legal status of the anti-pickpocketing alliance is controversial: "Tanzi" surnamed Feng, a 27-year-old self-taught college student, is a member of the "Wuhan Anti-pickpocketing Volunteer Alliance". In an operation, Feng Xiao was detained in criminal detention on June 5438+February 10, 2006, and was arrested on the 28th of the same month.

The dead thief's name is Yang Man (a pseudonym). On September 24th, 2006, Yang Man was arrested by volunteers when he was stealing at the bus stop of Qingnian Road in Wuhan. "After Yang Man was captured, he provoked and insulted us. Xiaofeng hit Yang in the leg and arm with a crowbar. 10 minutes later, the police took the arrested person away. Yang Man was sent to the hospital for a special examination, and the film showed no internal injuries. " The "lifetime" (net name) memories of companions who participated in anti-pickpocketing activities. Unexpectedly, 28 days later, when Yang Man went out for activities, he suddenly twitched and lost consciousness. He was sent to tongji hospital for treatment and died. After forensic identification, it was severe subarachnoid hemorrhage and subdural hemorrhage, which led to central respiratory and circulatory failure and died.

The establishment of the anti-piracy alliance was initiated by a group of young people in Wuhan on the Internet. The anti-piracy alliance has carried out dozens of anti-piracy activities. In July, a website named Wuhan Volunteers Union was established. Anti-pickpocketing activities once reached a climax.

According to reports, the transportation and some self-defense equipment of the members of the anti-smuggling alliance are paid by themselves without any remuneration. They usually take the way of driving away or catching the thief on the spot to deal with the thief who is stealing, and send the thief caught to the nearest police station.

Thieves are rampant in Wuhan, stealing things in broad daylight, and many citizens are too scared to stop them. What we want to do is to unite a healthy atmosphere so that thieves can't be too presumptuous. A member of the anti-piracy alliance named "scalpel" said this.

Because of Xiaofeng's arrest, the anti-piracy alliance recently stopped its anti-piracy activities. Everyone is waiting for the investigation result of the case. At the same time, the status of anti-piracy alliance and related issues have also caused many thoughts.

One view is that the anti-smuggling alliance belongs to an unregistered association and it is illegal to carry out activities. Some people think that it is not only legal for the people to spontaneously organize alliances to crack down on pickpockets, regardless of fame and fortune, but also a civic spirit of being brave.

It is understood that the anti-piracy alliance once gave technical guidance to public security organs, but the police did not agree. When someone proposed to ban the anti-piracy alliance and prohibit its activities, the police did not adopt it. "Some complicated! We will not express our position and will not come forward to stop the anti-piracy alliance. " A person from the Wuhan Public Security Bureau said.

Combating illegal crimes is the duty and power entrusted to public security organs by law. Is the activity of the anti-piracy alliance legal? This issue is equally controversial. Ren Xunxiang, a lawyer in Wuhan, believes that anyone who exercises his rights, even if it is to safeguard social justice, must do so within the scope of the law. When maintaining social order, we should treat legality against illegality, not illegality against illegality. Another lawyer, Zhou Jingwen, believes that any ordinary citizen who sees someone stealing has the right and obligation to stop it and try to hand it over to the public security organs.

The debate belongs to the debate, and most people still think that the anti-piracy alliance should be recognized as legal. Because the law does not prohibit citizens from fighting in teams, then it should not be considered illegal.

Chen, an associate professor in the Department of Sociology at Huazhong University of Science and Technology, believes that the emergence of these NGOs shows that it still has certain social needs. These volunteers with strong sense of social responsibility should be encouraged to serve the society more and better. Now people have doubts about Wuhan Anti-Robbery Alliance, because there is no good guiding mechanism. If possible, the relevant departments can guide these non-governmental forces according to the situation and provide them with relevant training. The resultant force will be greater than expected.

Seven, the female driver slapped the female toll collector on the highway and said that she would challenge the law: On the night of the 25th and the early morning of the 26th, a female driver driving a Dongfeng Honda made a scene at the Guangzhou Baiyun Airport Expressway toll station. During the period, she not only took out the front lock and warning signs and smashed the toll booth, but also shouted "I want to challenge the law." In full view, she slapped Xiaolan, the toll collector in the fifth toll lane. On May 8, under the persuasion and mediation of the public security department, the female driver came to the airport high-speed toll station again to apologize to Xiaolan. However, the female driver is still very arrogant. This made Xiao Lan and other toll collectors very angry. The reporter learned from the airport public security bureau that the female driver who made trouble and hit people was sincere and willing to apologize at home during the mediation and persuasion process of the public security department, so she was not sentenced to administrative detention, but was punished by 200 yuan. Currently, she is submitting for approval. On the evening of April 25th, 1 1: 55, the female driver made things difficult for the female toll collector twice. "When the car came, I had a premonition that something was going to happen." Recalling the vicious incident, toll collector Xiaolan looked gloomy. She told reporters that the female driver's car suddenly rushed through the toll window. "I reached out to pick up the card, but she didn't make any action. Usually I would say' Miss, please pass me the card', but her eyes were so sharp that I was scared at first sight, so I had to bend down and reach for her card. "After 1 more minutes of hard work, Xiaolan took the Yuetong card from the female driver and brushed it. Just as Xiaolan was about to return the card to the female driver, the female driver started the throttle. "She drove the car forward a little, so it was farther away from the toll booth." The stationmaster Zeng, who witnessed the whole process of the incident, told the reporter that in order to return the card to the female driver, Xiaolan leaned out again and bent down to put the card in her hand. "However, she didn't drive away, but scolded." The female driver was emotional. Not only did her cursing become more and more ugly, but she also rushed down the station in front of the toll booth, pointing and cursing more and more fiercely. Xiao Lan, who had only one year's working experience, was frightened and hurriedly closed the window of the toll booth.

Eight, Nanjing "6? 30 drunk driving incident "causes reflection, and the law should no longer give Nanjing forgiveness" 6? The "30 drunk driving incident" triggered a reflection that the law should no longer forgive: on June 30, drunk driving caused 5 deaths and 4 injuries. On the afternoon of August 19, 2009, when the author asked the witnesses of a drunk driving accident in Nanjing on June 30, Lee Hung, a melon farmer selling melons in Jinsheng Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing, was still worried and could not help but cry. That drunk driver should spend his life in prison. " At 8: 20 pm on June 30th, 2009, Lee Hung set up a stall on the roadside to sell watermelons as usual. Suddenly, a black Buick with the brand SUATH 900, like a runaway wild horse, staggered towards her from south to north. Bang, a garbage truck crashed into the melon stall, and her forehead was injured and she was bleeding. Lee Hung saw the car continue to rush forward and hit two cars parked on the side of the road, and the broken glass was scattered all over the floor. After that, the out-of-control car hit a walking couple, the man was hit by a van on the side of the road, and the woman was hit by another car. This woman was pregnant for seven months, and her child was aborted ... Passers-by who witnessed the tragic situation called on the driver to stop, but the car continued to rush forward and hit a parked car on the side of the road. The trunk of the car was hit into the car, and the left tire rolled around on the road ... The car flew past the door of a supermarket, and a couple who had just come out of the supermarket were knocked down ... After a series of accidents, the car still didn't exist. Angry citizens ran and shouted, "Catch up with him! Catch up with him! " A passing taxi driver ran after the car. After a while, the taxi driver found that the engine of the accident car was emitting white smoke and slowed down. He quickly parked his car in front of the accident vehicle. When the taxi driver got off the bus, he found that all the airbags in the car were opened, the front cover of the car was seriously damaged, and the driver squatted on the steering wheel without saying a word. At this time, the police arrived, and when they saw the bloody scene, they could not help crying. Lee Hung said that she learned from the public security department that night that the vehicle had knocked down nine passers-by and damaged six parked cars. Among them, three people died on the way to the hospital, two died after being rescued in the hospital, and the other four were treated in Jiangning District Hospital. After the police controlled the driver, they found that he was full of alcohol. Experience blood, the driver's blood alcohol content is 38 1 mg per 100 ml. According to the law, 80 mg per 100 ml of adults is drunk, and the driver involved in the accident is seriously drunk driving. Driver Zhang Mingbao, 43, is the captain of the individual construction team. During the trial, Zhang Mingbao confessed that he invited several clients to eat in a restaurant on Jinsheng Road that night and drank 780 liang of white wine. After dinner, he drove home, because he drank too much, and his car was out of control. Sober Zhang Mingbao realized that he had made a catastrophe. In the face of police interrogation, his voice trembled and his eyes were red. He repeatedly said that he would sell his house and car and try his best to compensate the families of the deceased and the injured. The next day, the police put Zhang Mingbao into criminal detention.

9. Family members of Hepu 2 teenagers who died of illegal sand mining will claim compensation through law: On July 20, the family members of two drowning children in Dagang Village, Xichang Town, Hepu told reporters that they decided to claim compensation from the sand yard owner through legal channels. 13 On the afternoon of July, their child drowned while swimming in an illegal mining site. According to Ms. Huang, a villager in Dagang Village, Xichang Town, one afternoon in July 13, Xiaonan (8 years old) and Xiaowen (13 years old) and their cousins (14 years old) in the village went to play by the Dagang River not far from the village, and then swam by the river in the mining area where they were working. Unexpectedly, after a while, they sank into the water. Xiao Nan was rescued after struggling to lift his younger brother Xiaowen out of the water, but Xiaowen and Xiao Xiong were killed. The villagers told reporters that after the bodies of the two teenagers were salvaged, because the family members and the mine owner failed to reach an agreement on compensation, the family members found a large piece of ice around the child's body and died at the scene of the accident for three days. The family of the deceased accused that before sand mining, the water in Gaogang was less than one meter deep, so you could cross the river directly by rolling up your trouser legs. However, at present, sand mining in the sand mining field leads to uneven river bottom, and there are many deep pits nearly ten meters, but there are no protective measures or signs warning against swimming near the sand mining field. They believe that this tragedy has a direct causal relationship with this mine field, and the owner of the mine field has an unshirkable responsibility. They also learned that this mining area has been in operation for more than a year, but it has no mining license. Pei Shuo, the owner of the sand mining field, said that before the accident, the sand mining workers at the scene repeatedly warned three children not to swim here, but they ignored them. When the child had an accident, three workers who were collecting sand actively rescued him. After rescuing Xiaonan from the shore, they continued to dive into the water to search for two children. "Two drowning children belong to minors. The guardian has an unshirkable responsibility when the child is away. " After the accident, the Xichang Town Government of Hepu County attached great importance to it. /kloc-on the afternoon of 0/5, the family of the deceased and the quarry owner held a mediation meeting. The parents of the deceased believe that the sand mining field should compensate the families of the two children for a lump sum of 6.5438+0.5 million yuan, plus 20,000 yuan for burial expenses. The owner of the sand mining field thinks that he has done his duty, and out of humanitarianism, he is only willing to pay 8000 yuan for funeral expenses. On 16, two drowning teenagers were buried three days after they died. On the 20th, the family of the deceased told reporters that they had entrusted lawyers to claim compensation from the mining area through legal channels.

X. Many owners were trampled to death by thieves outside their homes and left action signals: Case: Pretending to be a decoration worker 12 At about 5: 40 pm, Zhao Bin, the detachment leader of the public security detachment, patrolled the elevator downstairs in Building B, "Catch a thief!" Suddenly, on the third floor of/kloc-0, the owner leaned out of the balcony and shouted for help. Zhao Bin blocked the elevator on the basement floor, transferred two patrol security guards with walkie-talkies, and assigned another security guard to guard the elevator on the basement floor. The security guards were quickly in place, and other security guards searched the stairs of building B layer by layer. After a while, the elevator door on the ground floor opened and a middle-aged man in red came out, looking flustered. Zhao Bin came forward to ask about his identity. The man said that he was a decorator of the owner's family name Zhang on the 2 1 floor. After that, he took out a business card of a home improvement company and lit a cigarette. "What's the name of the master? Hey, contact? " In the face of doubt, the man can only tell the name of the owner, but he doesn't know the contact number. "He came to my house to steal a computer!" /kloc-the owner who called for help on the 0/3 floor came and immediately recognized the man as a thief. 2 1 building, the owner surnamed Zhang also received the property management notice and rushed back to confirm that the man was not her home decoration worker. The owners who heard the news were very angry and rushed to "interrogate" the man. The man finally admitted that he stole a laptop and hid it in the corridor on the fifth floor. Under its guidance, the security guard found the stolen computer. The man was handed over to the police station. Investigation: Where did the thief who found the mysterious symbol outside the door get the courage to break into the house in broad daylight? According to Mr. Zhang, the owner of Building B, in the face of the owner's "interrogation", the thief revealed an important message-the accomplices have been stepping on it for two or three days, leaving traces outside the house according to which homes are empty during the day and which homes are empty at night. Yesterday, Chen Guangxu, manager of Chongqing Shangshangju Property Development Co., Ltd. introduced that after the incident, security guards stepped up patrols and found seven mysterious symbols on the 0/3 floor of Building B/KLOC-and adjacent floors-four of them were composed of "+"and "-",and most of them were painted on the wall outside the security door. In the other three places, only an "A" was drawn outside the door. Under the guidance of the security guard, the reporter saw the wall painted with this symbol. Mysterious symbols are only about 1 m from the ground, so they are generally not easy to find. According to the security guard, these symbols are arranged regularly, with "+"above and "-"below; Some of them have "-"on them and "+"on them. What do you mean by different arrangements? Security doesn't know much about it. After discussion, the owners who are still enjoying their homes explain the mysterious symbols: "+"is on the top and "-"is on the bottom, indicating that there are people in the owner's house during the day and no one at night; "-"is on the top and "+"is on the bottom, indicating that there is no one during the day and someone at night. One owner, who asked not to be named, said, "I checked the news about thieves stepping on the spot on the Internet, and this symbol has also been found in other cities in China. The public security organs later confirmed that it was a new trend of burglary. " Reminder: Remove strange traces in time. The reporter learned from the police yesterday that the thief surnamed Yuan, 46, from Zhongxian County, had a record of burglary and had been detained. The police said that the thief stepped on the spot and left a secret signal, which needs further investigation. According to the cracked cases, the police reminded the public that some thieves would sneak into the community disguised as promoters who distributed advertising fees or claimed to decorate houses for the owners. The usual method is to insert an advertisement on the door handle of the owner and come back for observation in two or three days. If the advertising fee is not taken away, it is judged that there may be no one in the room recently, so there is a burglary. It is worth mentioning that scribbling symbols and other patterns on doors or doorframes that ordinary people can't understand is similar to the principle of stepping on advertising leaflets-if no one cleans them for a few days, thieves will think that there is no one in the room and theft may occur. The police believe that if members of the public find foreign objects inserted or strange symbols painted in the doors, they should remove them immediately from the perspective of cleaning or theft prevention. Two months ago, residents of Building No.92, Shabei Street, Shapingba District said that they also found the mysterious secret code in the building, and thieves came soon. It turned out that in the corridor between the 5th and 6th floors of the building, the words "Dog, 1 1. 18" were written on the stairs. A resident who lives on the 5th floor of Unit 2 of the building said that he came home from work last year1October1August and saw the words "There is a dog". A few days later, some residents reported that they heard an abnormal sound in the corridor late at night, pushed the door and found a black shadow running downstairs in a hurry. After that, because the police car often stopped downstairs, that kind of abnormal sound and shadow never appeared again. Residents speculate that "keeping a dog" means not stealing from upstairs. If you want to steal, you can steal from downstairs. After discovering the thief's secret code, some residents changed their password locks to prevent theft, and individual top-floor residents simply made their own iron fences to seal up the whole corridor. "The discovery of the thief's secret code scared us for nearly two months." Mr. Zhu on the sixth floor said that residents were still worried-maybe there would be words or symbols that people couldn't understand that day in the building.