My roof is leaking, and the property has started a maintenance fund, but it is said that my house has been enabled for emergency maintenance and can't be repaired any more. Is there such a saying?

Please refer to your local Measures for the Management of Housing Maintenance Funds. The use of the maintenance fund requires the signatures of all interested owners and the approval of the Housing Authority. What the property said about using the maintenance fund may not exist, but it is just your rhetoric. There may be several difficulties with this property. The first construction unit has been slow to repair, and the second property cannot be repaired by itself. Without this material and technology, the third repair is costly and difficult (generally internal cracks caused by the translation and settlement of the building structure); Fourth, in the original construction, we cut corners and make up for it ourselves. There will be many bad situations.

Let's analyze who will fix it. If it is a single-family villa, the roof part is your private property, and you need to repair it yourself after the warranty period (it must have passed, and the warranty period is in two books); If the roof of a high-rise building leaks into your house, read "two copies" first when buying a house. Roof waterproofing is generally guaranteed for 5 years. If there is no cost problem for non-man-made damage, the developer's construction unit will repair it (they can also entrust property maintenance, but it depends on whether there is authorization or express in the two books);

Now you probably understand why the property is wrangling, and take the "two books" and the "preliminary property agreement" to the property department of your local housing management department to respond; Use the media; Start other owners in similar situations (I don't think this thing in your community is like a case)

I hope it will be settled soon.