Analyzing the contradiction of property management with the relationship between supply and demand

Property management companies came into being in line with the market environment. At the beginning, it was intended to solve the housing problems encountered by owners and create a comfortable community environment. However, in recent years, more and more property management conflicts show that there is a big deviation between the management of property companies and the wishes of owners.

Most of the owners' wishes are to pay property fees on time, but property companies take money to do practical things. However, in addition to the three main functions of security, cleaning and housekeeping, the management of property companies sometimes raises property fees in order to increase the company's efficiency. If the property management company does something practical and the owners are satisfied, then the property management company demands to increase the property management fee. After considering for a period of time, the owner will agree to the requirements of the property management company. However, if the property company (seller) does not do practical things and the owner (buyer) is not satisfied, it is reasonable for the owner to refuse to agree to the property request to increase the property fee.

From the perspective of supply and demand, the property company (seller) and the owner (seller) are equal, and the property company's property fee and the owner's comfortable residential environment are complementary. Why are there so many contradictions in property management now? The root cause lies in the property management company. Property companies should solve the three functions of security, cleaning and home economics for owners by collecting property fees. However, for their own interests, the property management company actually forced the owners to raise the property fees and reduce the treatment of front-line employees such as security guards and cleaning workers, which led to many community problems. There are many problems in the community, and the owners are naturally dissatisfied with the property company because they have paid the property fee and have not enjoyed the convenience they deserve.

Why do property companies insist on knowing that the owners are not satisfied? It may be because of the lack of certain rules and regulations on the supervision of property companies. It would be nice if the property management company also needs assessment. A street-based property company failed in performance appraisal, and relevant departments trained the property company. Three months later, 60% or 70% of the owners of the residential area still support the replacement of the property company, and the relevant departments can organize the owners of the residential area to choose another mature and experienced property company for the residential area through elections.