When can I cancel the property?

What about the property in the "hate" community? We can use two common cases to illustrate.

Case 1: Where should the battery car in the community be parked?

Dahong house was purchased in general second-tier cities, and the developer publicized it at the beginning of buying a house.

"separation of people and vehicles, high-grade comfortable community" However, after the delivery of the community, buyers found that the "separation of people and vehicles" promised by developers when selling houses was not implemented at all. Parking spaces are everywhere on the ground, and when the house is delivered, except for a group of little boys, the property is all over.

An old man who can't even stretch his waist straight.

The main point that makes Dahong and many owners dissatisfied is that,

The matter of "the parking place of the battery car in the community". This community has

50%

Our building is a small high-rise building (no overhead floor), and there are also

50%

The house belongs to a high-rise residence (

1

The building is an overhead floor), according to the design idea of the general community, high-rise residential buildings

1

The top floor of the building is full of children's toys and other entertainment facilities. However, the overhead floor of this community is full of battery cars.

Owners such as Dahong have repeatedly reported to the property that "people and cars should be separated, and cars and electric cars should all go into the basement", but every time they get the news, "the owners disagree". This may be painful for residents of high-rise buildings. With more and more people in the community,

50%

The battery car of the owner of the foreign house is also parked on the overhead floor of the high-rise building, which often blocks the road and people can't get through.

This is actually a dilemma, indicating disagreement.

"Battery cars enter the basement" are basically small high-rise owners of houses, and those who agree to enter the basement are high-rise owners. High-level owners such as Dahong have repeatedly argued with the property because of this matter, and therefore stopped paying property fees.

Case 2: Should the property stop the owner's water and electricity?

A while ago, "

The property restricts the owner from paying the water fee.

"Things became popular on the Internet, and at one time,' the problem of property and owners' was mentioned from behind the scenes. The thing is, this woman owner needs the help of the property to solve some problems at home. The property shirks this matter to the real estate developer, and the real estate developer shirks this matter to the property, so she kicks the ball back and forth.

How to deal with this matter from the standpoint of the owner?

What should I do about the problem of "no property"? It is estimated that there is only one way, and that is not to pay property fees. So the hostess did not pay the property fee directly. However, property is naturally not a vegetarian. In this old community, the water and electricity in the community are all managed and allocated by the property. Owners need to go to the property to apply for water charging cards and recharge cards. So the property manager told me to stop the hostess from recharging the water card in large quantities and only recharge her at a time.

10

Yuan money.

Finally, people saw this scene: the female owner came to the property office with her baby in her arms, knelt down to the property manager and demanded more water charges.

In fact, in the process of living in a residential area, the owners are dealing with residential property companies. The quality of property service is clear at a glance. now

80%

Some residential properties feel like "owners". The key is that these property companies are self-built properties by developers, and they have an innate sense of superiority. They regard the owner as "the customer of the community and the object of operating profit", so that the cart before the horse, the property gives up service and is completely transformed into "operating the community". So in recent years, there have been more and more voices about the cancellation of property.

Is the property really cancelled? Central media

30

Word sentence

!

Some people say that real estate should be cancelled, while others say that real estate should continue to exist. So how should we face this dilemma? The central media gave a basic attitude.

Reprinted by Xinhua News Agency

Property companies should not be cities.

H

Medicine bucket ""

The article tells us what attitude we should have towards this matter in the future.

Xinhua News Agency finally used it.

30

A kind of expression:

Before finding a better alternative service model, the property still has its value and necessity.

From above

30

It can be seen that it is unrealistic and unrealistic to cancel the property industry in the short term. Because the most basic unit of a city is a community, and the city is composed of countless communities, property plays an irreplaceable role in the management and service of the community, and it is also one of the basic conditions for owners to live in peace of mind.

Xinhua also pointed out that many buyers now say that the key reason for canceling their properties is uneven property services, and some properties even encroach on the interests of owners. To solve this problem in the future, it is still necessary to rely on systems and rules and use rules.

The "property behavior" locked in a cage may be solved.

Although it is impossible to cancel the property in the short term, there is good news.

According to the new regulations,

2022

Since 2000,

There is no need to pay 3 property fees.

.

1

Many cities have introduced regulations, and some miscellaneous fees are not required.

Recently, several cities have issued a series of regulations intermittently, canceling some unreasonable property fees in residential areas.

For example, according to the report of Metro Express, cities such as Shaanxi clearly point out public consumption expenditure (energy consumption, water consumption, electricity consumption, etc. ) in the community should not be shared by the owners, these costs should belong to the category of property fees. In addition, in cities such as Shandong and Shenzhen,

2020

Solstice year

2022

There were similar requirements in 2006, and the owners should know.

2

Without the agreement of the contract and the approval of the industry Committee, the property itself raises the cost standard, so it is not necessary to pay it.

With the attack of inflation, the prices of many commodities have risen to a certain extent, and some communities have

10

Over the years, once

five

The property fee of ten cents is still.

five

A dime, the property company is unwilling to increase the number of service personnel, and even more unwilling to improve the service level because of its low profits. Therefore, the property company wants to raise the property fee standard, from

five

Raise the payment to

2

Yuan money.

However, the increase in this fee needs to be based on the owner's agreement to sign a new property contract. In some old communities, property companies directly put forward

The "Notice" clarifies that the property fee will be raised from next month.

1.5

Yuan dynasty (1206- 1368)

/

Square meters. This is obviously against the regulations.

three

, public * * * area not only don't have to pay fees, and the income belongs to the owner.

A district in Zhengzhou, the industry Committee took it out at one time.

20

More than 10,000 yuan is allocated to the owners, among which

20

Ten thousand yuan is distributed according to the proportion of shared area of each household. The larger the pool of funds, the higher the shared income. This part of the income basically comes from community doorman advertisements, community elevator advertisements and public parking spaces.

According to the property law and property law

T

The content of the case stipulates that the income of the exclusive property rights area of the community belongs to the exclusive owner, and the income of the public property rights area of the community belongs to all owners. exist

80%

The above-mentioned community, because the owners do not know how to obtain this part of the income, was eventually taken away by the property company free of charge.

So, the above

There is no need to pay three more fees.

.