There was a fight between the owners of the community. When the security guard saw it, he stopped it first, but then he left without calling the police. In this case, the property company has the resp

There was a fight between the owners of the community. When the security guard saw it, he stopped it first, but then he left without calling the police. In this case, the property company has the responsibility. 1. Whether the property management company has the responsibility depends on the stipulations of the property service contract. You can't have the idea of "big real estate" and do everything. The property is only fulfilling the contract, not the government;

2. In maintaining order, the practice of security is only half fulfilled. First of all, he saw it and stopped it, that is, he actively fulfilled his obligations and made achievements, but unfortunately the follow-up actions failed to keep up;

3. In this case, try to stop, help coordinate and let nature take its course. But can not be stopped, immediately call the police and assist the public security organs to deal with it;

4. It is unreasonable to ask for property compensation for fighting between owners that hurts people. On the other hand, if both sides damage public property in the process of fighting, they should also be held accountable;