What are the classic case studies of residential property?

Because the problems encountered in the process of property management are very complicated, laws and regulations are always indispensable, and the property service contract signed according to law is the basic basis of property management. Then the problem is coming. Do you know any classic cases of residential property? Next, I will give you a brief introduction.

Classical case analysis of residential property

1. External wall water pipe leakage

The odd outdoor wall water pipes on the sixth floor of a residential area 108 unit leaked, which wet the three external walls in a large area. The property company requires maintenance, so who should pay for the maintenance?

There are 8 households with unit number 108, and the statement is not uniform. For example, the residents on the 7 th and 8 th floors said that this matter has nothing to do with them and there is no maintenance fee; Residents below the sixth floor said that the maintenance fee should be paid by the residents on the sixth floor; Residents on the sixth floor said: it should be paid from the maintenance fund.

Case study:

Water pipe leakage is usually a general maintenance, just replace the external water pipe. So there is no need to use the maintenance fund. After the water pipe is repaired, eight families will benefit. According to the principle of "who benefits, who is responsible", each household will maintain together and share the specific costs.

This building is slippery.

When the owner Xiao Li passed the lobby of the residential building, he fell to the ground because of the wet ground, causing a fracture and being hospitalized for more than 30 days, which cost several thousand yuan in medical expenses. Xiao Li believes that he fell because the ground slipped, so the property management company should bear part of the responsibility, and the property management company should compensate him for medical expenses, lost time and mental damages.

Excuse me: does the property management company need to take responsibility for this matter? Talk about your opinion.

Case study:

Whether the property company should pay compensation depends on whether the law stipulates that it should bear civil liability.

According to Article 125 of the General Principles of the Civil Law, if safety measures are not taken to dig pits, maintain or install underground facilities in public places, roads or passages, causing damage to others, the construction personnel shall bear civil liability.

In this case, the property company has neither warning nor preventive measures for the wet ground, and should bear civil liability for compensation. Otherwise, there is no need to bear civil liability for compensation.

Editor's summary: After reading the above introduction, I believe everyone has a further understanding of the classic case analysis of residential property. Please continue to pay attention to our website for more information, and more exciting content will be presented to you later.