The owner's household appliances are broken, is the property responsible?

"Property Management Regulations" stipulates that property service enterprises shall provide corresponding services in accordance with the provisions of the property service contract.

The realty service enterprise fails to perform the realty service contract, causing personal and property safety damage to the owner, and shall bear corresponding legal responsibilities according to law.

Although the Property Management Regulations stipulate the security obligations of property companies, it does not mean that owners have the right to claim the rights of property companies for personal and property losses at any time and under any circumstances.

The security obligations of property companies are mainly the auxiliary obligations of public security management, the obligations of maintaining social order in residential areas, the obligations of maintaining houses and public facilities and preventing risks.

At present, the legal profession generally believes that the security obligation of property service enterprises belongs to the field of contract law and is an agreed obligation. The Contract Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates: "The parties shall fully perform their obligations as agreed. The parties shall abide by the principle of good faith and fulfill the obligations of notification, assistance and confidentiality according to the nature, purpose and trading habits of the contract. "

It can be seen that there is a causal relationship between owner theft and unit door damage; If the unit is damaged, does the property company repair it in time? If it is not repaired in time, does it constitute a breach of contract, resulting in the loss of property of the owner, Sun Dao, one of the parties to the contract? If so, the property company should bear part of the responsibility, otherwise the property company should bear the legal responsibility improperly.