An example of seeking civil rights over sovereignty.

No matter who believes in God's myth and culture, or who claims to be the representative of modern science and technology and supports the theory of evolution, they will be speechless in the face of an indisputable fact, that is, whether they firmly believe that God created Adam and Eve, or that Nu Wa pinched people with clay, or that human beings evolved from the life of single cells to the life of ancient apes, they cannot deny this fact. Whether Adam and Eve who were driven out of the Garden of Eden and their descendants, or people who evolved along the way, the number of people in the early days will not be too large. In that era of flooding and primitive living conditions, human beings were forced to divide into many small communities because of their limited production capacity. The social activities of human beings are just living a social life of equality and mutual assistance in their own small community, namely the clan. No authority, no oppression, no country, no law. Mutual assistance is morality. With the continuous improvement of human production skills, people get more and more food and have the ability to feed a larger community. However, due to the expansion of the activities of various groups and the interweaving of living spaces, it is not the previous exclusive community to claim food resources. At this time, human beings are primitive and simple, do not know how to share with others, treat people in their own community, help each other and treat people outside themselves, which may be regarded as enemies, because this is a serious threat to the survival of early human communities, and the safety of each member affects the reproduction of the whole community. However, the original custom of free life between the same kind of people who don't kill or rob can't cope with the changes at this time. Therefore, members of the community elect brave and moral people as "kings", and the right of "kings" is the original power in the world. The "king" provides security for everyone, and everyone provides life needs for the "king". The original "king" was directly granted by the people, and signed a fair deal with the people. The "king" is no longer a direct productive labor, and the needs of life depend on the people's taxes, while the people are neither producing nor dealing with things other than production. The original "king" has a simple and clear responsibility, which is to safeguard the right of survival of each member and develop and expand the ethnic group. The power of the "king" comes from the grant of the people and is also subject to the recovery of the people. The people's right to restrict kingship is not only long-standing, but also legal. The original "king" is controlling the original kingship. The kingship follows the purpose of serving the people wholeheartedly and regards the living customs of all members as the highest etiquette. The kingship does not threaten the power of all members, nor does it threaten the power of individual members, but is respected by the people. Royalty is a parallel power derived from people's power.

The motive of kingship is to protect the original human rights. Because kingship must be produced by the authorization of all the people to individuals or a few people, kingship and human rights are relatively narrow and one-sided. It is impossible for us to have audio-visual materials on the emergence of specific kingship in ancient times, but we can get biology evidence of human social life from ancient literature records and people whose reality is still in the development stage of primitive society. At first, the emergence of kingship will never be obtained through violent conquest, because people are born gregarious, and any human member is bound by the group system. Any powerful individual who leaves the group cannot survive, because people who live alone, no matter how powerful, individuals who have no information exchange with group members and individuals who have no community care, will lose the competitive pressure and care of group life, and their will to survive will be abnormal. Those who lose their normality will eventually be doomed to mental breakdown, and loneliness will be enough to stifle human beings who are suitable for gregarious life. Since loneliness is the killer of social species, the former king will certainly not violate the will of all members and gain the ruling power by coercive means. The original "king" must be a king with moral demeanor and widely supported by the people. Moreover, the "king" is an individual after all, and the power of the individual is no matter how powerful it is. It can be seen that the later theory of "political power comes out of the barrel of a gun" is absurd and seriously defiled the heresy that violates the natural spirit of mankind. Arguing that power comes from violent conquest is an unreasonable sophistry that distorts the nature of human society.

-With the gradual expansion of the original population, a nation and a country appeared later, and the kingship evolved into the sovereignty of the later country. The essence of sovereignty is still the continuation of the kingship granted by the people's power. It can be seen that the part of personal power transferred by all members has gathered into kingship-later sovereignty, which is not contradictory to the individual human rights of members. Sovereignty comes from the need to protect human rights. Since the ceded human rights were partly conceived as kingship and kingship evolved into later sovereignty, then human rights are the father of kingship and the ancestors of sovereignty evolved from kingship.

From the above example, we will also find a substantive problem. Since the main body of society is a society composed of people, all social activities are of course carried out around the core of people-oriented Therefore, respecting human rights is not only an individual's right of private communication, but also an inherent requirement of human dignity. The importance of human rights shows that activities around human rights are the greatest publicity.

-It is proved that human rights are the greatest public right, and there is an important support, that is, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in June 5438+0948 65438+February 10. Although it is not a mandatory convention, it is the next two mandatory United Nations human rights conventions, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Political Rights. The importance attached by the United Nations to human rights reflects that most countries in the world respect human rights. It can be seen from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a world constitution that human society should abide by. Since human rights have such a grand declaration and background, it proves that human rights are the greatest public rights in the world. Since human rights are the largest public rights in the world, it is definitely greater than the sovereignty that only governs local affairs in local areas.

-In the realistic human society, countless nationalities have established many countries, all of which have constitutions and laws. As we all know, no matter what country, no laws and regulations can contradict the national constitution. Constitution is the outline of a country. Although there are few constitutional provisions and many general laws and regulations, no amount of general laws and regulations can contradict the Constitution. The seriousness and generality of the constitution are contrary to general laws and regulations.

From ignorance to the present, thousands of years of civilization have recorded too many human rights sufferings and countless glorious deeds of sacrificing people for freedom. For thousands of years, since the people handed over power to the "king", although many "kings" began to do their best to entrust the people, most of them and their descendants later abandoned signing contracts with the people. Putting kingship above people's power, dragging human society into the era of tyrannical monarchy, extorting and cruelly squeezing people, the history of human blood and tears for thousands of years records the invasion and plunder of unscrupulous "kings" to other nation countries, the enslavement and exploitation of small and weak ethnic groups again and again, the praise of tyrants who don't trust people, the rampant excessive power that has lost the constraints of people's power, and the common people's accustomed to slavery and their cries for tyrants. Accustomed to flogging, century after century, the blood of Christ Jesus on the cross did not awaken the conscience of the rulers, and Confucius' ideal of benevolence did not get a corresponding response from the rulers. The people of Mencius are noble, and the rulers scoff at them, from ancient Egypt on the Nile to Babylon, the luxurious city, from the Epang Palace of the autocratic Qin Shihuang to the burning city of Nero in ancient Rome, from the Great Wall of China to ancient times.

-The wheel of history flies by in the dark. By the Renaissance hundreds of years ago, thinkers of the Enlightenment declared to the people: sovereignty belongs to the people, tyrants can't be kings, wolves can't herd sheep, tyranny is public enemies, people have the right to cut off the tyrant's head, and people have the right to take back the tyrant's power. The world has dawn, freedom, universal suffrage, separation of powers, constitutionalism, power suppression and humanity. In the west of the world, the establishment of democratic system has been generally promoted, human rights have been greatly developed, rational people have burst into unprecedented creativity, and scientific and cultural civilization has promoted the change of the world with geometric achievements until the end of World War II and the demise of fascist tyranny. 1948' s Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that the world has entered a brand-new era of human rights civilization. When the bloody totalitarianism in Eastern Europe died out in the 1990s, few countries in the world were under the control of totalitarian tyranny. With the help of modern technology, the universal spiritual concept of human rights has become a household name in the world. However, any reactionaries and dictatorships that oppress human rights in history will not automatically withdraw from the historical stage. They use safeguarding sovereignty and drinking water rights as an excuse and human rights as an excuse. Under the pretext that not killing is the greatest human right, they do everything possible to hinder people's demands for human rights, such as dictators such as Gaddafi, who also slaughter people who demand democratic rights, threaten to go door-to-door to search those who insist on protesting and threaten the people. How can tanks crush people into patties? As we all know, the democratic right is also a natural human right among human rights, and it is also the people's birthright to ask the rulers to step down and hand over power, and Gaddafi's purpose is to maintain absolute rule over the people. People will be deprived of their human rights forever. Therefore, it is reasonable for them to do everything possible to discredit their human rights demands. Ignoring human rights is the birthright of the people, the most universal and extensive power in the world, and the most basic public power of all mankind. Ignoring human rights is the foundation of all power in the world. They used armed force to treat people's natural rights violently. This kind of violence is a crime against humanity, a child who resists his parents.

-Since the original "king" came from the people's authorization, the sovereignty derived from the extension of kingship should not suppress the people's rights in the future. No matter what the name of the supreme ruler of sovereignty is, whether he is called the President's Emperor Party or the King's Chairman, Chief Tsar, his power must be supervised by the people's power, and he must crawl at the feet of the people's power. There is no reason why he can ignore the people's natural rights and put the cart before the horse. The essence of any sovereign country today is nothing more than a group of people accepting the authorization of the people and implementing the management of state affairs. No matter how powerful and vast the country is, it has no right to oppress the people's basic human rights. Sovereignty is only an administrative power operating in a region. Reasonable sovereignty and basic human rights are not contradictory. Since the origin of sovereignty is the original royal power, its power source attribute should also be given by the people. Motivation should also be to serve the people. Therefore, sovereignty should not override the basic human rights of the people, nor should it conflict with the human rights provisions in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is called the world constitution.

The concept of human rights has no national boundaries, unlike sovereignty which is restricted by national boundaries. The people's declaration of human rights in an inclusive world is by no means a tool of aggression, but a powerful backing for promoting world peace and harmony. The natural sanctity of human rights beyond race, region and national boundaries does not conflict with the cultures of all nationalities in the world, nor does it conflict with sovereignty. And those countries that defile human dignity and those regimes that oppress people's power, just like Gaddafi's regime, just can't tolerate the parallel development of national sovereignty and people's human rights, or use state power to compress people's basic rights. The Qaddafi regime is incompatible with the values of the whole world. It is not difficult to see the root cause. One wants to protect mankind, the other wants to fight against mankind, and an authoritarian country that doesn't even cherish the dignity of human life. He said that out of patriotism, in order to protect national sovereignty, he killed those who asked him to step down and demanded democratic rights. His theory holds water. Sovereignty should protect and serve human rights, but it only uses it to destroy human rights. Sovereignty should be a right under human rights, but it wants to suppress and persecute human rights. The core of Gaddafi's real robber logic is not difficult to expose, but it is nothing more than reversing the principle that human rights are greater than sovereignty. Since human society is dominated by people, the authorization of people's will is the legal basis of governance. If Gaddafi respects public opinion, it is to fear the people. However, can Gaddafi hand over power? For decades, he has stolen national sovereignty, acted perversely and committed many evils. He is afraid of facing a fair trial after losing power. Therefore, he stubbornly resisted and continued to commit violence against the people. It can be seen that suppressing people's human rights in the name of defending sovereignty is the essence of dictatorship. Therefore, this dictatorship that tramples on human rights is the public enemy of all mankind, and covering up the legitimacy of their crimes against humanity is just like defending sovereignty. Can this powerful trend of human rights and democracy, which can be traced back to the source of human society, be stopped?

-The voice of human rights and democracy is the real gospel of the people of the world. Stopping smearing and bloody repression will only be counterproductive. The initial demand for democracy and human rights is the demand for non-violence. Forced repression is not only an armed resistance in Libya, but also an armed resistance anywhere in the world, as long as it does not actively seek negotiations and wants to solve it by violence, it is possible to suppress the armed resistance team!