How to treat the problem of high housing pool?

A recent article entitled "Buy a house of 100 square meters, only 70 square meters. How did the "pool area" of such a pit come from? The article was widely circulated on the Internet, which caused many netizens to sing. Under the background of high housing prices and increasing regulation, more and more people begin to ask: Since the international housing prices are basically calculated according to the interior area, why should the pool area be included in the calculation of housing prices and property fees in China? Can the functional departments respond to the public's concerns about the chaos of the pool area when dealing with the chaos in the real estate industry?

Combing the news, it is not difficult to find how paradoxical the concept of "pool" is. 20 12 A couple in Anhui bought a two-bedroom apartment with a building area of 7 1.7 1 m2. When handing over the house, they found that the actual interior area was only about 44 square meters, and the sharing coefficient reached 38.7%. In Gaomi, Shandong Province, when the buyers closed the house, they found that the spacious and exquisite second-class room had become a small and simple one-bedroom. Only one bed could be put down in the room, and the pool area was as high as 52.35%, which was dubbed as "the best pool area in history" ... Where the pool range came from and how much it cost was mainly advocated by the developers; However, is it possible for the owner to measure the pool area, including lobby, lobby, corridor, aisle, elevator lobby, stairwell, elevator shaft and guard room on duty? Can you afford it? Judging from the basic life experience, the pool is very likely to be a confused account.

The vague "pool" has actually become a pocket for profit. Housing sales, property fees and other standards are "building area" including pool, so there is considerable pool area with "discretionary" space, which is easy to cause unexplained extra expenses to property buyers. At the same time, it also creates a legal dilemma. For a simple example, if the property right of the pool area belongs to the owner, should the income from posting advertisements in these areas also belong to the owner? According to common sense, it is really unreasonable for the owner to pay real money and empty the owner's name, but it cannot be effectively disposed of and benefited.

In fact, since 1995 "Rules for Calculation of Commercial Housing Sales Area and Allocation of Public Building Area" stipulates that "the whole building of commercial housing is sold, and the sales area of commercial housing is the whole building area", there has been a dispute over the pool area, and there has been a call to cancel the pool pricing. However, there has been no substantial change over the years, and even the anecdote of "30%" and "40%" pool ratio is often staged in the public opinion field, which is to some extent a microcosm of the extremely thin discourse power of the real estate seller's market and the buyer. Imagine, in the face of the reality that the verb "grab" is often used in buying a house, do buyers have enough bargaining space and the confidence to claim rights and interests? However, the mechanism of "pooling" has actually aggravated inequality, and the pool area that should have been the object of reform has not been solved for a long time.

In recent years, it is not difficult for some cities to see the attempt of pricing sales based on the use area, but it is far from forming a scale and has not shaped new industry norms. The vague concept of "pool" really deviates from the basic common sense of "clearly marking the price" in the principle of market economy. This deadlock needs to be solved by relevant departments from the mechanism level.

Houses are used for living, which is the current policy design and folk voice. Clarifying the vague concept of "pool", making the use area the basis of transactions and squeezing the operating space of developers is to restore and highlight the residential attributes of houses to a greater extent. When the regulation of the real estate market has become a policy context, solving the "pool" problem has been out of the control of the regulation problem, and even from the legal level, it should be the basic problem to be solved first.

Source: Guangming Net-Guangming Daily

The pool problem has a long history, and the government can't be unaware of it. All tears!