Job Recruitment Website - Property management - Ningbo Vanke Property, the protagonist of "Golden Gate", withdrew. How to punish inaction?

Ningbo Vanke Property, the protagonist of "Golden Gate", withdrew. How to punish inaction?

In China, most property companies are basically doing nothing, not only the service is poor, but also charging fees, which leads to more and more owners saying that they want to ban the property. Recently, a banner door pushed the property company to the focus of media debate, and many netizens were mocking the property company in succession. So is it really reliable to cancel the property company? Let me give you my opinion.

If property management companies are really banned, there are still many problems to be solved. 1 is a health problem in the community. Although the property has not been done, at least the overall sanitary environment has been cleaned up, so that garbage will not pile up like a mountain, and no one will take care of the snakes, insects, rats and ants in the green belt. The second is the safety at the entrance. Some are strict in nature and some are not, so I won't comment on this. But at least, there is another person at the door. More or less people will not be chaotic. The third is that all kinds of public facilities need regular maintenance, and these properties are under construction, otherwise we have lived in the housing of the community for more than ten or twenty years. There will be more or less water, electricity and equipment maintenance problems to be solved on the elevator.

According to the point I mentioned above, many people will say that residents can manage their own communities and set up property management committees. It seems seamless, but when they really manage themselves, there will be more problems. At least on the property management company side, they are an independent enterprise, and the interests of residents in the community are treated equally. However, if the industry committee is in charge, it is likely to fight if there are differences, just like parliaments in some countries. And when it's time to pay, the money is very uncomfortable. There is no property management company here to solve the problem at this time. How to do this?

Therefore, the abolition of property companies can not be rushed, or we should take a long-term view. Our main problem is to get rid of those property companies that don't take money to do things, not to ban them.