Now the property right of the house is 70 years. Won't it be ours in 70 years?

At this stage, I personally think that it is a question whether those high-rise houses can live for 70 years. This is one of them.

Secondly, the house itself is worthless. What is precious is that at least 50% of the houses can't stand it. As for 70 years, it doesn't make much sense whether it is 100 years or forever.

First, just like the self-built houses in rural areas, the domineering nature of repairs, no matter how large the area, can only sprout from the enclosure, comforting themselves to go back to the countryside to raise them later.

Old.

Just like my parents, I called for retirement in my hometown and bought a suite in the county.

Round off, my grandparents passed away, who lives in that building in the countryside?

Let's start with the quality of the house. It's not that I look down on current developers.

Because I will be eligible to buy a house next year, I am also paying attention to the house in Changsha during this time.

Some communities can only work for 10 years. Boy, that's broken. It's called a slum.

There are garbage dumps everywhere, and a lot of "garbage" is piled up on the fire escape. It should be the stuff of some old man and lady.

Even the intermediary can only touch his head and say to me: this position is good! The school is nearby! Shopping is convenient!

Go to the new community within two years and talk about property, environment, location, surrounding potential and business circle. ?

Some second-and third-tier small cities have begun to divide "old cities" and "new cities"

Who will live in the old slums in the future?

If the population is not too dense, you won't be a whole for a while.

There is plenty of time. All right.

As soon as the school moves, the new hospital is repaired and the big shopping mall is built, you will wait for your pile of cement to die.

Second, there is a residential area in Changsha, which was once known as a top-notch dish. When driving by that day, the intermediary patted his thigh excitedly and said

Look, look, that community is a super-top property in Changsha.

I glanced out of the corner of my eye. To be honest, I won't rent that stupid house. It is said that people who live there are either rich or expensive.

Now that it's broken like that, I thought to myself, people who still live there are afraid that their families will fall behind.

So, the theme of your 70-year lease theory

I think what you think is a little too beautiful, really.

As long as one day the government needs to make money by selling land, 80% of the houses can only become sickles of leeks.

Unless your city is booming.

It's still the national luck Changhong, or whether your house can live for 70 years is a problem.

When I say live, I don't mean the appreciation and depreciation of the house.

But it is not in line with the living environment after 70 years. It ran away 70 years ago.

When I first went to college, I went to be a tutor. A parent in Xigang called me and asked me to give a lecture. ?

I went by bus and got into the alley as soon as I got off the bus. Passing through the alley, it is a huge old Soviet building with rusty windows, scattered glass and broken bricks on the ground. When I entered the building, the corridor was narrow and dark, and the public toilets with four households and one staircase were very annoying.

That disgusting smell, white iron rivets and flower doors, I directly thought it was an abandoned building. Chatting with the young man, everyone upstairs has basically moved away, and those who have money have bought new houses, but those who really have no money still live here, or one.

Some migrant workers rent here, and there is no property, no greening, and all they see is shabby garbage.

These buildings were built in the 1970s and 1980s, that is, forty or fifty years ago. There is no need to repair it, and no one is willing to spend money to repair it.

The third is to completely dismantle and build a large number of high-rise buildings.

Can these top leaders last for 50 years?

The service life of residential elevators stipulated by Technical Supervision Bureau is 15 years.

The reasonable service life of waterproof layer in general buildings is 10 years, and that of high-rise buildings is 15 years. Poor quality and shorter life.

According to the regulations, the minimum service life of insulation layer should not be less than 25 years. The house I bought was handed over for two years, and the insulation layer fell off, which was entrusted by the developer.

The security guard of the industrial company was smashed. I don't believe the insulation can last for 25 years.

During 17-29, the condition of most building components began to deteriorate. Circuits, heating and water pipes may face large-scale maintenance one after another.

Change.

The most difficult situation is that after the special maintenance funds are spent, the property needs to collect maintenance funds. But like roofs, elevators, pipes,

Some public maintenance projects that require full fund-raising may not be bought by the unaffected owners, causing infinite delay.

In 30-50 years, owners began to face high maintenance costs. The decorative components outside the residential building and the decoration inside the residential building are facing.

With large-scale renovation and replacement. The previous situation may have been experienced again.

After 50 years, if the design period is exceeded, the owner shall take the initiative to invite the technical department for inspection at his own expense. If there are major structural problems, such as beams and columns,

If cracks appear, preventive maintenance should be carried out according to the appraisal results, but if they are classified as dangerous buildings, they will really be sentenced to death. ?

Fourth, it is estimated that it will be a slum like a garbage dump. In fact, it costs millions to rent for 30 to 40 years, and 70 years is impossible. This is a residential area built by the government of the Republic of China to accommodate teachers and public officials when it moved back to Nanjing from Chongqing, the capital of the Republic of China, in 1946.

It has been 70 years now, and the listing price of this community is 8 1000 yuan, which was even more expensive and worse before the government cracked down on the school district housing.

Not much, even 91 thousand. Walking in the community, the greening rate is high and there are plenty of parking spaces. Four-story low-density small buildings are the main ones, and every household takes care of small gardens.

The house is well decorated, but the sense of history still makes people feel quaint and quiet.

But!

There are too many old communities in Nanjing. How many of them are treated as a village? Near Jiming Temple and Xuanwu Lake, the entrance is the subway entrance, next to it.

Is it next to the municipal government or a famous primary school district? Is the 70-year-old community green enough, and is there enough parking space?

Most of the old houses have poor huxing, few parking spaces, almost no greening, extremely crowded living environment, and some even have no independent toilets.

You can only make a pension plate and just need to get on the bus. It's just that this must be a house in the city, just need to see it.

If it's an old house in the suburbs, you just need it and don't even want to go. So it's still the old saying, location! Do you think your house will not become the center of the city in 50 years? If not, will this house be decorated? Why would anyone want to buy your suburb?

If it is still the top floor of the 32 nd floor, it has been 50 years, and the elevator has been changed several times, which is even worse. There are few really high-quality lots, and with the development of the city, it is difficult to predict where the center of the city will be in fifty years.

So most people's houses will be worthless in a few decades.